Humans are reason for why domestic animals have strange and varied coat colors

Jan 16, 2009
Photo of 'smiling' black and white pigs in a row: Black domestic pigs with white banding caused by mutations in their MC1R gene. This fancy color pattern would never survive in the wild, but is highly prized by people. Photo Jeff Veitch

(Physorg.com) -- Humans have actively changed the coats of domestic animals by cherry-picking rare genetic mutations, causing variations such as different colours, bands and spots, according to a new study.

The study on wild and domestic pigs by Uppsala and Durham Universities, published today in the open access journal PLoS Genetics, reveals that the genetic changes happened over thousands of years.

Although the study was carried out on pigs, the results can explain the evolution in the coat colours of all domesticated animals as they all express the same melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene, one of the genes that controls coat colour in animals.

The study also explains for the first time why there is a stark contrast between the coat colours of wild and domestic animals and gives further insight into the process of evolution, particularly since animals were first domesticated about 10,000 years ago.

Study co-author Dr Greger Larson, of Durham University's Department of Archaeology, said: "The Mesopotamians had different coloured farm animals 5,000 years ago, and in that regard they were no different to Paris Hilton, who has a pink Chihuahua, or anyone else with animals with unusual coat colours. This study demonstrates that the human penchant for novelty stretches back thousands of years."

For the study, the researchers studied one of the key genes controlling coat colour in animals, the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene, in samples of modern wild and domestic pigs from Europe and Asia.

They looked at the DNA sequences of both types of pigs and the effects of the mutations on the protein. While DNA mutations are a natural part of the evolutionary process, some have no effect on the protein, while others can results in different coat colours and strange patterns.

DNA mutations were observed in both wild and domestic pigs. However, in the wild pigs, which have a uniformly black-brown coloured, highly camouflaged coat, none of the mutations altered the protein or the coat colour. Researchers say it is likely that any mutations that resulted in coat colour changes were rapidly selected out of the population by predators, ensuring that the mutation disappeared.

In the domestic pigs, nearly all of the observed mutations changed the protein. In some cases there were three consecutive, or layered mutations - evidence that the initial mutations have been around for a long time. Researchers say this shows that the mutations and resulting coat colour changes were actively encouraged and perpetuated by farmers over thousands of years.

Dr Greger Larson added: "Early farmers may have decided to change the coat of their livestock for a number of reasons. One is that it facilitated animal husbandry since it is easier to keep track of livestock that are not camouflaged. Another could be that it has acted as a metaphor for the improved characteristics of the early forms of livestock compared with their wild ancestors. A third possibility is that the early farmers were as amused and as taken with biological novelty and diversity as we are today."

Professor Leif Andersson of Uppsala University, Sweden, who led the study, said: "Our study settles the debate by showing that the prime reason for the disparity in coat colour is intentional selection by humans. It also shows how quickly a protein can change under strong selection and how humans have created black-spotted pigs, for example, by selecting several consecutive mutations that have occurred by a random process."

Provided by Durham University

Explore further: Brother of Hibiscus is found alive and well on Maui

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

London mayor expected to say city will rock 5G by 2020

51 minutes ago

London mayor Boris Johnson this week will pledge to bring 5G to London in the next six years, reported The Telegraph on Monday. The pledge is part of a more extensive plan for London's infrastructure between ...

Illuminating the dark side of the genome

2 hours ago

Almost 50 percent of our genome is made up of highly repetitive DNA, which makes it very difficult to be analysed. In fact, repeats are discarded in most genome-wide studies and thus, insights into this part ...

T-Mobile deal helps Rhapsody hit 2M paying subs

3 hours ago

(AP)—Rhapsody International Inc. said Tuesday its partnership with T-Mobile US Inc. has helped boost its number of paying subscribers to more than 2 million, up from 1.7 million in April.

Recommended for you

Molecular gate that could keep cancer cells locked up

6 hours ago

In a study published today in Genes & Development, Dr Christian Speck from the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre's DNA Replication group, in collaboration with Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), New York, ...

The 'memory' of starvation is in your genes

10 hours ago

During the winter of 1944, the Nazis blocked food supplies to the western Netherlands, creating a period of widespread famine and devastation. The impact of starvation on expectant mothers produced one of the first known ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Modernmystic
2.8 / 5 (5) Jan 16, 2009
EVIL HUMANS!!! Giving animals varied and diverse coat colors. Oh the humanity! Just another example of our utter disregard for nature and our pillage of the natural world.
Crucialitis
5 / 5 (1) Jan 16, 2009
I thought we figured this out when we domesticated those Russian wolves. Seems humans select for bushy and curly tails, floppy ears, juvenile body frames, and of course social skills with humans.
As for Modernmystic, those animals naturally changed colors by living an advantageous lifestyle with humans. We don't eat the pretty ones, I'd say that's an advantage in the current state of things.
I'd be more concerned with the fact that we engage in neoteny on ourselves every generation. Soon we'll be piebald too! :j
Modernmystic
5 / 5 (1) Jan 16, 2009
I was being just a tad sarcastic bro :)

But I understand it's hard to know in this day and age...there are some people out there who could make a comment like my initial post and be ACTUALLY serious....
Velanarris
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2009
Pigs aren't really the best animal for this study.

If you turn a standard domesticated pig loose, even if it has reached full maturity, the body will undergo changes making it indistiguishable from a feral hog. Most notable are the growth of the incisors, darkening of the coat, and the substantial skull geometry change. I am aware that this doesn't necessarily change the genetics of the animal, but to see a completely different phenotype arise, even after full maturity has been reached, should cast some doubt on the ability of the pig to be a suitable subject for this testing.
KBK
not rated yet Jan 17, 2009
So they are gawddamn Werepigs.

And we eat them.

Interesting.

As for Co-inkydinks....they are also ..uh...IIRC..the best candidates for organ transplant into the human body - out of all of the animal world.

Whooda Thunk it.
KBK
1 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2009
"I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly.
I'm crying."

"Expert texpert choking smokers,
Don't you think the joker laughs at you? (ho ho ho, he he he, ha ha ha)
See how they smile like pigs in a sty, see how they snide.
I'm crying."

"I am the eggman (woo), they are the eggmen (woo), I am the walrus,...."
morpheus2012
1 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2009
haha cute

little piglets

more cute the stinky dogs or cats