Nuanced case for outsourcing by automakers

Dec 30, 2008

Automakers who favor the flexibility and price savings of outsourcing production must weigh carefully the product life cycle implications of sacrificing in-house manufacturing, according to the Management Insights feature in the current issue of Management Science, the flagship journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS).

Management Insights, a regular feature of the journal, is a digest of important research in business, management, operations research, and management science. It appears in every issue of the monthly journal.

"How Does Outsourcing Affect Performance Dynamics? Evidence from the Automobile Industry" is by Sharon Novak of MIT and Scott Stern of Northwestern University.

The study examines the impact of outsourcing on performance in automobile product development.

While outsourcing allows firms to take advantage of a wide range of global suppliers and specify high-powered performance contracts, vertical integration allows firms the flexibility to adapt to customer feedback and develop capabilities over time.

This leads to an important managerial trade-off when considering the outsourcing decision: while outsourcing will tend to deliver higher levels of initial performance during the life cycle of a product, in-house development will allow a firm to experience a higher rate of performance improvement over the entire product life cycle.

One implication of this trade-off is that the value to in-house development is not captured by a simple assessment of upfront cost or metrics exclusively based on initial quality. Instead, managers can justify in-house development when sustainable competitive advantage is based on developing capabilities and enhancing the customer experience over time.

This perspective doesn't argue against outsourcing. Instead, by adopting more of a product life cycle perspective, managers can more effectively anticipate — and be able to mitigate — the challenges that are likely to arise as a consequence of their choice of outsourcing versus internal development.

The current issue of Management Insights is available at mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/reprint/54/12/iv .

Source: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences

Explore further: Super Bowl athletes are scientists at work

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Life without a mouth, stomach, or gut

Sep 19, 2006

All living organisms are inhabited by a complex community of beneficial microorganisms that are essential for their development, health, and interactions with the environment. Often these microorganisms protect ...

Fashion goes high-tech

Jun 28, 2006

As the world begins to see India as a growing technological hub and trade restrictions become less restrictive, a new type of technology is making its debut from here -- software that makes the global fashion industry an ...

Recommended for you

Super Bowl athletes are scientists at work

Jan 30, 2015

Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman gets called a lot of things. He calls himself the greatest cornerback in the NFL (and Seattle fans tend to agree). Sportswriters and some other players call him ...

Sundance doc examines real-life Close Encounter

Jan 29, 2015

Earth authorities are completely unprepared for the arrival of alien visitors and worried humans should ready themselves by watching a groundbreaking documentary, the film's director boasts.

Toward a scientific process freed from systemic bias

Jan 26, 2015

Research on how science works - the science of science - can benefit from studying the digital traces generated during the research process, such as peer-reviewed publications. This type of research is crucial for the future ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.