New research: Genes may influence popularity

Dec 22, 2008

A groundbreaking study of popularity by a Michigan State University scientist has found that genes elicit not only specific behaviors but also the social consequences of those behaviors.

According to the investigation by behavioral geneticist S. Alexandra Burt, male college students who had a gene associated with rule-breaking behavior were rated most popular by a group of previously unacquainted peers.

It's not unusual for adolescent rule-breakers to be well-liked – previous research has made that link – but Burt is the first to provide meaningful evidence for the role of a specific gene in this process. The study appears in the latest issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, which is published by the American Psychological Association.

"The idea is that your genes predispose you to certain behaviors and those behaviors elicit different kinds of social reactions from others," said Burt, assistant professor of psychology. "And so what's happening is, your genes are to some extent driving your social experiences."

The concept – which researchers call "evocative gene-environment correlation" – had been discussed in scientific literature but only in theory. This study is the first to really flesh out the process, establishing clear connections between a specific gene, particular behaviors and actual social situations, she said.

Burt collected DNA from more than 200 male college students in two separate samples. After interacting in a lab setting for about an hour, the students filled out a questionnaire about whom they most liked in their group. In both samples, the most popular students turned out to be the ones with a particular form of a serotonin gene that was also associated with rule-breaking behavior.

"So the gene predisposed them to rule-breaking behavior and their rule-breaking behavior made them more popular," Burt said.

Burt is working on similar studies with female college students, as well as mixed-gender social groups. She also plans to explore associations with other social behaviors and other genes in larger samples.

Source: Michigan State University

Explore further: New insights into eyewitness memory from groundbreaking replication initiative

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Protecting privacy also means preserving democracy

Sep 01, 2014

What impact does the proliferation of new mobile technologies have? How does the sharing of personal data over the Internet threaten our society? Interview with Professor Jean-Pierre Hubaux, a specialist ...

Recommended for you

Mother-daughter research team studies severe-weather phobia

Sep 19, 2014

No one likes severe weather, but for some just the thought of a thunderstorm, tornado, hurricane or blizzard can severely affect their lives. When blood pressures spike, individuals obsessively monitor weather forecasts and ...

Study: Pupil size shows reliability of decisions

Sep 18, 2014

Te precision with which people make decisions can be predicted by measuring pupil size before they are presented with any information about the decision, according to a new study published in PLOS Computational Bi ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Dunbar
1.6 / 5 (7) Dec 22, 2008
Laughable!

What idiots are resonsible for funding this sort of nonsense? The amount of variables involved in this study are astronomical - throwing a dart at a board filled with "possible outcomes" would be just as valid.

Sociobiology = any crank welcome!
ArtflDgr
1 / 5 (8) Dec 22, 2008
Dunbar seems to think that biological machines have magical ability beyond their construction. because dunbar isnt capable or man is not capable yet of understanding it fully. which means that such discoveries are going to bother dunbar alot and that the machine takes in more informaiotn and acts on it than just what he is concious of.

i can look back and i can imaging dunbar as a primitive man standing there talking all so much about how progressive he is and how fire is just a fad and will come to nothing.
DeadCorpse
1.1 / 5 (8) Dec 22, 2008
Hhmm... here I thought one of the laws of scientific discovery was that "correlation is not causation". This entire premise seems based off it.

What next? Do spoons really make people fat?
Corban
not rated yet Dec 22, 2008
Hypothetically, if the link between nature and nurture was reduced down to math, then knowing one would know the other. Nature -> Nurture, Nurture -> Nature. Of course, then we have to ask ourself: what's going to happen with that power?

Who should we encourage to have that power?
What limits should we place on that power?
Should we allow anyone to possess it?

These are common ethical equations for any breakthrough.
jaaa
not rated yet Dec 22, 2008
Oh hey 19th century genealogical predisposition, didn't know you were making a comeback.