Exercise suppresses appetite by affecting appetite hormones

Dec 11, 2008

A vigorous 60-minute workout on a treadmill affects the release of two key appetite hormones, ghrelin and peptide YY, while 90 minutes of weight lifting affects the level of only ghrelin, according to a new study. Taken together, the research shows that aerobic exercise is better at suppressing appetite than non-aerobic exercise and provides a possible explanation for how that happens.

This line of research may eventually lead to more effective ways to use exercise to help control weight, according to the senior author, David J. Stensel of Loughborough University in the United Kingdom.

The study, "The influence of resistance and aerobic exercise on hunger, circulating levels of acylated ghrelin and peptide YY in healthy males," appears in the online edition of the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, published by The American Physiological Society. The authors are David R. Broom, James A. King and David J. Stensel of Loughborough University, and Rachel L. Batterham of University College, London.

Treadmill versus weight lifting

There are several hormones that help regulate appetite, but the researchers looked at two of the major ones, ghrelin and peptide YY. Ghrelin is the only hormone known to stimulate appetite. Peptide YY suppresses appetite.

Ghrelin was discovered by researchers in Japan only about 10 years ago and was originally identified for its role as a growth hormone. Only later did its role in stimulating appetite become known. Peptide YY was discovered less than 25 years ago.

In this experiment, 11 male university students did three eight-hour sessions. During one session they ran for 60 minutes on a treadmill, and then rested for seven hours. During another session they did 90 minutes of weight lifting, and then rested for six hours and 30 minutes. During another session, the participants did not exercise at all.

During each of the sessions, the participants filled out surveys in which they rated how hungry they felt at various points. They also received two meals during each session. The researchers measured ghrelin and peptide YY levels at multiple points along the way.

They found that the treadmill (aerobic) session caused ghrelin levels to drop and peptide YY levels to increase, indicating the hormones were suppressing appetite. However, a weight-lifting (non-aerobic) session produced a mixed result. Ghrelin levels dropped, indicating appetite suppression, but peptide YY levels did not change significantly.

Based on the hunger ratings the participants filled out, both aerobic and resistance exercise suppressed hunger, but aerobic exercise produced a greater suppression of hunger. The changes the researchers observed were short term for both types of exercise, lasting about two hours, including the time spent exercising, Stensel reported.

"The finding that hunger is suppressed during and immediately after vigorous treadmill running is consistent with previous studies indicating that strenuous aerobic exercise transiently suppresses appetite," Stensel said. "The findings suggest a similar, although slightly attenuated response, for weight lifting exercise."

Focus on active ghrelin

Previous studies have been inconclusive about whether exercise decreases ghrelin levels, but this study may help explain those mixed results, according to the researchers.

Ghrelin comes in two forms, acylated and non-acylated. The researchers measured acylated ghrelin, also called active ghrelin, because it can cross the blood-brain barrier and reach the appetite center in the brain. Stensel suggests that future research concentrate on active ghrelin.

While the study showed that exercise suppresses appetite hormones, the next step is to establish whether this change actually causes the suppression of eating.

Source: American Physiological Society

Explore further: Biologists reprogram skin cells to mimic rare disease

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

When eating and dieting, follow your gut

Jul 29, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Eating a small lunch doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll be so hungry for dinner that you’ll eat more than usual, a new study suggests.

Recommended for you

Biologists reprogram skin cells to mimic rare disease

12 hours ago

Johns Hopkins stem cell biologists have found a way to reprogram a patient's skin cells into cells that mimic and display many biological features of a rare genetic disorder called familial dysautonomia. ...

Student seeks to improve pneumonia vaccines

Aug 20, 2014

Almost a million Americans fall ill with pneumonia each year. Nearly half of these cases require hospitalization, and 5-7 percent are fatal. Current vaccines provide protection against some strains of the ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

trail_runner
not rated yet Dec 11, 2008
You burn alot when your boarding -- and I bet its more like the treadmill in the experment (arobic vrs. resitance).

"sports : skateboarding" Burns 362 calories in 60 minutes
...over 3-hours that's ALLOT of calories -- I bet even if your appetite is suppressed your going to be craving the food! lol

The info was from :
http://webfitness...view_act&act_time=60&activity_type_id=446
bugmenot23
not rated yet Dec 11, 2008
I exercise every day alternating between cardio and weightlifting while resting on sundays. Running 5 miles on one day then doing weightlifting the next. The exercising however only curbs my hunger for a short time about 4 hours later I get very hungry and eat alot more than i would on a day i dont do either.
bmcghie
not rated yet Dec 12, 2008
I warm up for 5 mins, then run hard for 25 mins 6 days a week... and I rock climb 3 hours a day 6 days a week. Gotta say, the running is GREAT for cranking the metabolism. About an hour later after the run, appetite is enormous. Curiously, the rock climbing, even if I get hungry during, it always suppresses my appetite for about 4 hours afterwards. I'd say rock climbing counts as light aerobic activity, but I tend to more intense, shorter routes, which is also quite anaerobic. I would be interested to see how much the difficulty of the weightlifting session effects the results. I mean, what if you do loads of chin ups and push ups? Different from pure bicep curls? Maybe I'll go read that paper. :)
Auris
not rated yet Dec 15, 2008
Very interesting article - I find that intense training sessions do not create as big an appetite as a long slow session, ie a long (3 hr ) cycle ride at a low heart rate makes me ravenous & also great for fat burning...
http://www.total-...tips.htm