Thinking like a president: How power affects complex decision making

Dec 09, 2008

Presidential scholars have written volumes trying to understand the presidential mind. How can anyone juggle so many complicated decisions? Do those seeking office have a unique approach to decision making? Studies have suggested that power changes not only a person's responsibilities, but also the way they think. Now, a new study in the December issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, indicates that having power may lead people to automatically think in a way that makes complex decision-making easier.

Psychologists Pamela Smith, Ap Dijksterhuis and Daniël Wigboldus of Radboud University Nijmegen stimulated feelings of powerlessness or power in a group of volunteers by having some volunteers recall a situation when other people had power over them and other volunteers recall a situation when they had power over other people. Then they were given a complicated problem to solve (they had to pick among four cars, each varying on 12 different attributes).

The experiment was designed so that there was a "correct" solution—that is, one of the cars had the most positive and least negative attributes, although the optimal choice was not obvious. Both the "powerful" and the "powerless" volunteers chose among the cars, but some spent time consciously thinking about the problem, while others were distracted with a word puzzle.

Previous research has shown that most people can solve complex problems better if they engage in unconscious thinking, rather than try to deliberately examine and weigh each factor. The conscious mind is not able to consider every possibility—attempts to do so bog the mind down in too much detail. Unconscious thinkers are better at solving complicated problems because they are able to think abstractly and very quickly get to the gist of the problem—they do not spend a lot of time focusing on insignificant details of the problem.

The results showed that the "powerless" volunteers performed better when they were distracted—that is, when they unconsciously thought about the problem. More interestingly, the "powerful" participants performed equally well regardless of whether they were in the conscious thinking or unconscious thinking group.

These findings indicate that powerful people's conscious deliberation is very much like the unconscious processing of the rest of us—more abstract and better when it comes to complex decisions.

Source: Association for Psychological Science

Explore further: Eating your five-a-day is the key to a sexy sun-kissed glow

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Searching for aliens in the cloud

May 07, 2014

As a species, human beings are obsessed with the idea that there may be aliens out there, somewhere beyond our planet.

Student devises novel way to detect hackers

Apr 08, 2014

Patricia Moat gets a thrill from protecting people. As a youngster, she trained in martial arts. Later, she ran into burning buildings as a volunteer firefighter. Now she's finding new ways to protect American computer networks.

Recommended for you

Inside the teenage brain: New studies explain risky behavior

51 minutes ago

It's common knowledge that teenage boys seem predisposed to risky behaviors. Now, a series of new studies is shedding light on specific brain mechanisms that help to explain what might be going on inside juvenile male brains.

Conflicts with teachers are risk factor for school shootings

3 hours ago

As part of the TARGET project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, researchers at Freie Universität Berlin conducted a systematic literature search of all the available studies dealing with school ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gmurphy
3 / 5 (4) Dec 09, 2008
"Presidential scholars have written volumes trying to understand the presidential mind".Bush can barely speak, let alone make a complex decision. It's a pity he didn't choke on that pretzel
jefferson
5 / 5 (1) Dec 10, 2008
seems like a weak study. (the whole premise is determined on volunteers being identical in function) and that some pseudo scientific (imagine yourself in a powerful position, is supposed to be the equivalent of a presidential candidates mindset) Flimsy studies like this cause me to view many studies, when theres no control over variables to be very unscientific. I wish they had a better study than this one.