Like rest of society, doctors implicitly favor whites over blacks

Oct 29, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- In the first large study to explore possible unconscious bias among physicians, researchers have found that doctors mirror the attitudes of the majority in society and implicitly favor whites over blacks.

"This supports speculation that subtle race bias may affect health care, but does not imply that it will," said University of Washington researcher Janice Sabin, who presented the study in San Diego Tuesday (Oct. 28) at the American Public Health Association's annual meeting. "This research is too preliminary to know if there is a direct relationship between physicians' implicit, or unconscious, racial attitudes and the quality of medical care."

Sabin, who is an acting assistant professor of medical education and biomedical informatics, said: "Our findings fit with previous research showing bias is common in the general population. But we have to remember people are not racist if they hold an implicit bias."

Data from the study were drawn from a sample of more than 400,000 anonymous people who took the race attitude Implicit Association Test online during a 28-month period between 2004 and 2006. More than 2,500 of those test-takers identified themselves as doctors. The race attitude and a variety of other tests that examine various forms of bias are found on the Web site of Project Implicit (implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/ ) operated by the University of Washington, University of Virginia and Harvard University.

The Implicit Association Test captures subconscious, or implicit, bias by asking people to quickly associate positive or negative words with a series of photographs. In the race test the photographs are of black and white faces.

"We don't call what these tests show prejudice. We talk about it as hidden bias or unconscious bias, something that most people are unaware they even possess," said Anthony Greenwald, a UW psychology professor who created the Implicit Association Test and was part of the research team on the new study.

The people who took the test were predominantly American. Overall, 86 percent of participants said they lived in the United States. Of 2,535 physicians taking the test, 76 percent identified themselves as U.S. residents. Test-takers were predominantly white -- 69 percent of the entire sample and 66 percent of the doctors. There were smaller samples of blacks, Asians and Hispanics.

The majority of physicians in all racial and ethnic groups showed an implicit preference for white Americans compared to black Americans except for black physicians, who on average did not favor either group.

The researchers also looked at the factors of gender and other advanced college education and found virtually the same results. Women exhibited slightly lower, but still significant, implicit preference for whites. The story was the same for more than 6,100 people who said they had law degrees and more than 7,900 individuals who said they had doctoral degrees.

"The implicit bias effect among all the test-takers is very strong," said Sabin. "People who report they have a medical education are not different from other people, and this kind of unconscious bias is a common phenomenon.

"Although it may be a common assumption that high levels of education expose people to diverse ideas and ways of not being biased, subtle biased associations about race are nevertheless common. We have come a long way, but people may be unaware of these common unconscious biases. In medical education, we need to include examination of personal attitudes and beliefs in diversity training and continuing medical education to increase self-awareness so that doctors are alert to hidden attitudes and beliefs that may affect care for minority populations."

Other members of the research team are Brian Nosek, an assistant psychology professor at the University of Virginia, and Dr. Frederick Rivara, a UW professor of pediatrics. The research was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of Mental Health and a UW Magnuson Health Scholars Award.

The Implicit Association Test was developed a decade ago to measure the unconscious roots of people's thinking and feeling. Since it was created, more than 6 million people have taken versions of the test that have measured unconscious attitudes about such topics as race, gender, sexual orientation, age and various ethnic groups.

Provided by University of Washington

Explore further: Seth Mnookin on vaccination and public health

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Canada looks east-west to ship oil after Keystone veto

41 minutes ago

After US President Barack Obama vetoed a bill to expedite construction of the Keystone XL pipeline Tuesday, petroleum producers are expected to turn to Canadian routes to ship oil internationally, but hurdles ...

Internet access limited in developing world

1 hour ago

Most people in the developing world do not use the Internet, with access limited by high costs, poor availability and a lack of relevant content, a Facebook report said Tuesday.

Manhattan Project physicist Ralph Nobles dies at 94

1 hour ago

(AP)—Ralph Nobles, a nuclear physicist who worked on the Manhattan Project and later led efforts to save thousands of acres of San Francisco Bay wetlands from development, died following complications of pneumonia, according ...

In Japan, robot dogs are for life - and death

1 hour ago

Incense smoke wafts through the cold air of the centuries-old Buddhist temple as a priest chants a sutra, praying for the peaceful transition of the souls of the departed.

US sees little severe weather so far in 2015

1 hour ago

(AP)—While a big chunk of the nation deals with snow and ice, the U.S. is poised to end January and February with the fewest bouts of severe weather in decades.

Recommended for you

Uganda on defensive over medical 'brain drain' uproar

3 hours ago

Uganda's government on Tuesday hit back at mounting criticism of plans to 'export' over 200 health workers to the Caribbean, insisting it was only seeking to regulate an existing labour market and prevent abuses.

Seth Mnookin on vaccination and public health

Mar 02, 2015

Seth Mnookin, an assistant professor of science writing and associate director of MIT's Graduate Program in Science Writing, is the author of "The Panic Virus: The True Story Behind the Vaccine-Autism Controversy" ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.