Do cell phones increase brain cancer risk?

Oct 20, 2008

Major research initiatives are needed immediately to assess the possibility that using cellular phones may lead to an increased risk of brain tumors, according to an editorial in the November issue of the journal Surgical Neurology, published by Elsevier.

Recent studies have raised concerns that long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields (ELF) from cell-phone handsets can increase the risk of brain cancers and other nervous system tumors, according to the editorial by Dr. Ron Pawl, a neurosurgeon at Lake Forest Hospital, Lake Forest, Ill. He calls for collaborative research initiatives to determine whether the link between cell phones and brain cancer is real.

Scientists have long been concerned over the possibility that ELF exposure may increase the risk of brain cancers. Until recently, however, research has shown no clear link between cell phone use and brain tumors.

Earlier this year, a Swedish research group published an epidemiologic study suggesting an increased risk of brain cancers (gliomas) as well as acoustic nerve tumors (neuromas) in people using cell phones for ten years or longer. Tumors were more likely to develop on the same side as the cell phone was used. Other studies by the same group suggested that the use of wireless handsets in cordless home phones posed the same risk.

After reviewing the evidence, one author even suggested that long-term cell phone use is "more dangerous to health than smoking cigarettes." Other recent commentators have raised similar concerns.

The findings are alarming in light of the exponential growth of cell phones—now including widespread use by children and teenagers. The damaging effects of ELF, if any, might be even greater in the developing brain.

If the link is real, then rates of brain cancers should have increased over the last two decades. Some studies have reported that this is the case, particularly for the most malignant brain cancers. However, other studies have found a stable tumor rate.

Some commentators have suggested that apparent increases in the number of brain cancers might reflect the use of sophisticated imaging techniques like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. "However, the fact that the incidence of gliomas, especially the more malignant varieties, is increasing [...] warrants action on this issue," Dr. Pawl writes.

The problem, according to Dr. Pawl, is that no other research groups have performed actual studies showing a clear relationship between brain tumors and ELF. He calls on scientific societies to play a leading role in designing and conducting studies that will definitively determine the risks of brain cancer associated with ELF exposure, particularly from cell phones. "It seems that a cooperative effort by both the scientific community and state governing bodies will be needed," writes Dr. Pawl. "Some spearhead is now necessary in view of the magnitude and seriousness of the situation."

Paper link: www.surgicalneurology-online.com

Source: Elsevier

Explore further: Pack a travel first-aid kit for the holidays

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Microbiome may have shaped early human populations

Dec 16, 2014

We humans have an exceptional age structure compared to other animals: Our children remain dependent on their parents for an unusually long period and our elderly live an extremely long time after they have ...

Baby cells learn to communicate using the lsd1 gene

Dec 15, 2014

We would not expect a baby to join a team or participate in social situations that require sophisticated communication. Yet, most developmental biologists have assumed that young cells, only recently born ...

Research reveals structure of key CRISPR complex

Dec 10, 2014

Using a gene-editing system originally developed to delete specific genes, MIT researchers have now shown that they can reliably turn on any gene of their choosing in living cells.

New method solves centuries-old animal mystery

Dec 10, 2014

Most animal embryos contain three layers of cells that transform into every part of the body—from brains to bones to guts. Since the 19th century, biologists have been puzzling over which of these layers came first in animal ...

Finding the simple patterns in a complex world

Dec 03, 2014

An ANU mathematician has developed a new way to uncover simple patterns that might underlie apparently complex systems, such as clouds, cracks in materials or the movement of the stockmarket.

Recommended for you

Pregnant woman taken off life support in Ireland

Dec 26, 2014

A brain-dead pregnant woman was taken off life support Friday after a court ruled that her 18-week-old fetus was doomed to die—a case that exposed fear and confusion among doctors over how to apply Ireland's ...

'Tis the season to overeat

Dec 25, 2014

(HealthDay)—Overeating is common during the holidays, but there are strategies that can help you eat in moderation, an expert says.

Don't let burns mar your holidays

Dec 25, 2014

(HealthDay)—The risk of burns from fires and cooking accidents increases during the holidays, so you need to be extra cautious, an expert says.

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Modernmystic
3 / 5 (8) Oct 20, 2008
No...
Tekito
2.6 / 5 (7) Oct 20, 2008
Yes
Modernmystic
3.3 / 5 (7) Oct 20, 2008
Wow better turn off all your lights then Tek...visible light is higher frequency (ie closer to the ACTUAL cancer causing ionizing radiation) than microwaves are.
Velanarris
3.6 / 5 (7) Oct 20, 2008
Wow better turn off all your lights then Tek...visible light is higher frequency (ie closer to the ACTUAL cancer causing ionizing radiation) than microwaves are.


Doesn't matter. Cell phones operate on similar frequencies as many other household objects.

We all have the brain cancer now. Or, they're completely wrong, vote now by texting tumor to 1-800-CANCRRnD
Sirussinder
3.4 / 5 (5) Oct 20, 2008


Does Japan have a spike in brain cancer on the common right handed, right ear, left brain side since the cell phone craze?

NO...by now there would have been a pattern emerging in the population and there does not appear to be.
hudres
1.8 / 5 (5) Oct 20, 2008
The use of headsets, as required by law for drivers in many states, completely mitigates this problem.
M_N
3 / 5 (5) Oct 20, 2008
Since when did ELF stand for "electromagnetic fields"? I think they mean EMF. Hard to take an article seriously when they repeatedly make such a basic mistake.
Sophos
5 / 5 (6) Oct 20, 2008
The use of headsets, as required by law for drivers in many states, completely mitigates this problem.


After a Ph.D. in this field I do not believe non-ionizing radiation causes cancer. I just don't see a mechanism for damage.

However hudres if it does; headsets mean you are probably using the phone near your waist (cliped on or in pocket). There are a lot of organs near your waist much more sensitive to cancer induction than your brain.
Velanarris
3.7 / 5 (6) Oct 20, 2008
The use of headsets, as required by law for drivers in many states, completely mitigates this problem.


After a Ph.D. in this field I do not believe non-ionizing radiation causes cancer. I just don't see a mechanism for damage.

However hudres if it does; headsets mean you are probably using the phone near your waist (cliped on or in pocket). There are a lot of organs near your waist much more sensitive to cancer induction than your brain.


Not to mention that bluetooth is a 2.4 ghz signal. Which is closer to the range in which cancer causing radiation would be found than cellular signal.
GrayMouser
3 / 5 (3) Oct 20, 2008
Why worry? It was an editorial not serious science...
Soylent
2.7 / 5 (3) Oct 21, 2008
Not to mention that bluetooth is a 2.4 ghz signal. Which is closer to the range in which cancer causing radiation would be found than cellular signal.


Why would you expect a "range in which cancer causing radiation would be found" around 2.4 GHz?
Bob_Kob
4 / 5 (1) Oct 21, 2008
Higher frequency means bad.
Velanarris
4.5 / 5 (2) Oct 21, 2008
Not to mention that bluetooth is a 2.4 ghz signal. Which is closer to the range in which cancer causing radiation would be found than cellular signal.


Why would you expect a "range in which cancer causing radiation would be found" around 2.4 GHz?
Not expecting anything.

2.4 Ghz is closer to the bands of ionizing radiation than cellular 2.1 ghz is.
Lord_jag
5 / 5 (1) Oct 21, 2008
In real estate ELF is Electrical Light Fixtures.... as in all the chandeleers and such.

What does this have to do with cell phones?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.