Northerners' hands up to 3 times dirtier than those living in the South

Oct 15, 2008

The further north you go, the more likely you are to have faecal bacteria on your hands, especially if you are a man, according to a preliminary study conducted by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

But women living in the South and Wales have little to feel smug about. In London, they are three times as likely as their men folk to have dirty hands, and in Cardiff, twice as likely. The men of London registered the most impressive score among all those surveyed, with a mere 6% found to have faecal bugs on their hands. Overall more than one on four commuters have bacteria which come from faeces on their hands.

The Dirty Hands Study was conducted in order to provide a snapshot of the nation's hand hygiene habits, as part of the world's first Global Handwashing Day today. Commuters' hands were swabbed at bus stops outside five train stations around the UK (Newcastle, Liverpool, Birmingham, Euston and Cardiff).

The results indicated that commuters in Newcastle were up to three times more likely than those in London to have faecal bacteria on their hands (44% compared to 13%) while those in Birmingham and Cardiff were roughly equal in the hand hygiene stakes (23% and 24% respectively). Commuters in Liverpool also registered a high score for faecal bacteria, with a contamination rate of 34%.

In Newcastle and Liverpool, men were more likely than women to show contamination (53% of men compared to 30% of women in Newcastle, and 36% of men compared to 31% of women in Liverpool), although in the other three centres, the women's hands were dirtier. Almost twice as many women than men in Cardiff were found to have contamination (29% compared to 15 %) while in Euston, they were more than three times likelier than the men to have faecal bacteria on their hands (the men here registered an impressive 6%, compared to a rate of 21% in the women). In Birmingham, the rate for women was slightly higher than the men (26% compared to 21%).

The bacteria that were found are all from the gut, and do not necessarily always cause disease, although they do indicate that hands have not been washed properly.

Dr Val Curtis, Director of the Hygiene Centre at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, comments: 'We were flabbergasted by the finding that so many people had faecal bugs on their hands. The figures were far higher than we had anticipated, and suggest that there is a real problem with people washing their hands in the UK. If any of these people had been suffering from a diarrhoeal disease, the potential for it to be passed around would be greatly increased by their failure to wash their hands after going to the toilet'.

For more information about Global Handwashing Day, please go to: www.globalhandwashingday.org .

Source: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Explore further: Less than 1 percent of UK public research funding spent on antibiotic research in past 5 years

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The volcano of a hundred thousand mouths

Jul 02, 2014

When the 1893 World's Fair opened in Chicago, fairgoers aboard the world's first Ferris wheel soared high enough to compare two cities: the White City—gleaming whitewashed architecture built for the massive ...

Some people think astrology is a science – here's why

Jul 02, 2014

Most people reading this article will have also read their horoscope at least once. Even though scientific studies have never found evidence for the claims astrologers make, some people still think astrology ...

Invention loves collaboration at Milan show

Apr 14, 2014

Collaboration drove invention during Milan's annual International Furniture Show and collateral design week events, yielding the promise of homes without mobile phone chargers, and with more ergonomic seating, ...

The social and political impact of an everyday utopia

Jan 17, 2014

New research by Professor Davina Cooper from the University of Kent presents an argument for the political value of everyday utopias - a term developed to capture the way different kinds of organisations, ...

Recommended for you

New treatment fights common infant virus

10 hours ago

Researchers at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center announced results of a clinical trial of a new drug shown to safely reduce the viral load and clinical illness of healthy ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JerryPark
not rated yet Oct 15, 2008
Hand washing seems to be one of those problems which admit to no solution. We have all seen many at public restrooms who do not wash at all and many others who wash so briefly that they have not really washed.
holmstar
4 / 5 (1) Oct 15, 2008
seems to me like this could also be interpreted as a study of the cleanliness of hand-holds available on public transit systems. Perhaps cities in the south of Britain clean their buses more frequently than those in the north.
smiffy
5 / 5 (1) Oct 15, 2008
That wouldn't explain the discrepancy between the men and the women commuters at each station.

What's worrying about this report is not 'who's the dirtiest' but the fact that so many are carrying these bugs. It effectively means that if you use this public transport system you're very likely to pick up somebody else's bugs no matter how meticulously you wash your own hands.
vlam67
not rated yet Oct 15, 2008
ROFL.If these denizens of "civilized world" can't even manage to clean their hands properly after their "masterful strokes", I shudder at what logic implies for the rest of the undeveloped world!
holmstar
1 / 5 (1) Oct 15, 2008
That wouldn't explain the discrepancy between the men and the women commuters at each station.


sure it could... it *could be* possible that customs in Newcastle and Liverpool are to allow women to sit while men stand and use the hand holds, while in other regions this is not as much the case.