Religion makes people helpful and generous -- under certain conditions: UBC researchers

Oct 02, 2008

Belief in God encourages people to be helpful, honest and generous, but only under certain psychological conditions, according to University of British Columbia researchers who analyzed the past three decades of social science research.

Religious people are more likely than the non-religious to engage in prosocial behaviour – acts that benefit others at a personal cost – when it enhances the individual's reputation or when religious thoughts are freshly activated in the person's mind, say UBC social psychologists Ara Norenzayan and Azim Shariff

Their paper "The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality" appears in the October 3, 2008 issue of the journal Science.

The two-part paper first reviews data from anthropology, sociology, psychology and economics. Norenzayan and Shariff then go on to explore how religion, by encouraging cooperation, became a factor in making possible the rise of large and stable societies made of genetically unrelated individuals.

To date, says Norenzayan, the public debate whether religion fosters cooperation and trust has largely been driven by opinion and anecdote.

"We wanted to look at the hard scientific evidence," says Norenzayan, an associate professor in the Dept. of Psychology.

The investigators found complementary results across the disciplines:

-- Empirical data within anthropology suggests there is more cooperation among religious societies than the non-religious, especially when group survival is under threat
-- Economic experiments indicate that religiosity increases levels of trust among participants
-- Psychology experiments show that thoughts of an omniscient, morally concerned God reduce levels of cheating and selfish behaviour

"This type of religiously-motivated 'virtuous' behaviour has likely played a vital social role throughout history," says Shariff, a Psychology PhD student.

Shariff adds, "One reason we now have large, cooperative societies may be that some aspects of religion – such as outsourcing costly social policing duties to all-powerful Gods – made societies work more cooperatively in the past."

Across cultures and through time, observe the authors, the notion of an all-powerful, morally concerned "Big God" usually begat "Big groups" –large-scale, stable societies that successfully passed on their cultural beliefs.

The study also points out that in today's world religion has no monopoly on kind and generous behaviour. In many findings, non-believers acted as prosocially as believers. The last several hundred years has seen the rise of non-religious institutional mechanisms that include effective policing, courts and social surveillance.

"Some of the most cooperative modern societies are also the most secular," says Norenzayan. "People have found other ways to be cooperative – without God."

Source: University of British Columbia

Explore further: Bribery 'hits 1.6 billion people a year'

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Fresh nuclear leak detected at Fukushima plant

8 hours ago

Sensors at the Fukushima nuclear plant have detected a fresh leak of highly radioactive water to the sea, the plant's operator announced Sunday, highlighting difficulties in decommissioning the crippled plant.

Spacewalking astronauts route cable in 1st of 3 jobs

8 hours ago

(AP)—Spacewalking astronauts routed more than 300 feet (90 meters) of cable outside the International Space Station on Saturday, tricky and tiring advance work for the arrival of new American-made crew ...

Driverless shuttle will be on the move in UK

10 hours ago

(Phys.org) —"Autonomous public transport" is on the minds of planners who envision self-driving vehicles that would cross over short distances, suited for airport transport, industrial sites, theme parks ...

Recommended for you

Bribery 'hits 1.6 billion people a year'

Feb 27, 2015

A total of 1.6 billion people worldwide – nearly a quarter of the global population – are forced to pay bribes to gain access to everyday public services, according to a new book by academics at the Universities of Birmingham ...

How music listening programmes can be easily fooled

Feb 26, 2015

For well over two decades, researchers have sought to build music listening software that can address the deluge of music growing faster than our Spotify-spoilt appetites. From software that can tell you ...

Nature journal to begin offering double-blind peer review

Feb 23, 2015

Well known and respected journal, Nature, will begin next month offering researchers who submit their work for peer review, the option of having it done via the double-blind method—whereby both submitters and re ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

fuchikoma
not rated yet Oct 02, 2008
I think most if not all major religions could be seen to have served a very practical purpose, and continue to for some.

However the people who believe religion is a prerequisite for morality have such a skewed worldview that I believe it hinders them from treating people with basic dignity and respect in their own minds if someone has different religious beliefs, and there is no place for that kind of prejudice in modern society. It's a wholly arbitrary distinction that IMO rarely speaks for the character of the person being judged.

As with most things... proper moderate application is beneficial if actually needed, harmful if overdone or not needed.
Bob_B
not rated yet Oct 02, 2008
Yes, right on the nail head fuchikoma. I see religions having a circle of the faithful and if you are in the circle it is good. If you are not in the circle it is bad. In essence it is us and them. This is not an inclusive domain and the domain they preach we will enter at death will be full of nothing. But as long as they deceive themselves and leave 'us' alone 'they' can play whatever games they want. Why should religions care what others don't believe in? I think they need others to join up and affirm their choice as good or correct.

For me there is only 'us', the humans. We breed, we live, we die.

In the Big Inning (baseball for the unknowers)
Eve stole first, Adam stole second, Cain struck-out Able and the Prodigal son came home.
Oderfla
not rated yet Oct 02, 2008
I am glad to see this article!! Thank you!!
mogmich
not rated yet Oct 03, 2008
As a Dane I certainly agree, that there are alternatives for a modern society. The Scandinavian countries are some of the best functioning in the world, but Scandinavians are much less religious.

I am religious myself, but I don't see any problem in this. Actually it makes it possible for the individual to have a much more personal and mature view on his own religion.

Tip: read "Societies without God" by Phil Zuckerman.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.