Spacing, not size, matters in visual recognition, researchers find

Sep 25, 2008

You might think that the farthest distance at which you can hold a book and still read it quickly is determined by the size of the letters. However, New York University neuroscientists have concluded that it's the spacing between letters, not their size, that matters. In general, objects, such as letters, can be recognized only if they are separated by enough space, the "critical spacing." Objects closer than that spacing are "crowded" and cannot be identified. A broad review of this crowding phenomenon, appearing in the latest issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience, shows that this critical spacing is the same for all objects, including letters, animals, and furniture.

According to the authors, NYU Professor of Psychology and Neural Science Denis Pelli and Katharine Tillman, an undergraduate researcher in NYU's College of Arts and Science, the critical spacing is a key parameter in the brain's cortical architecture underlying object recognition.

"The idea that spacing limits object recognition could not be simpler, but it has been very hard to accept because it displaces a firmly held belief that visibility is limited by size, not spacing," Pelli and Tillman wrote.

The human visual system recognizes a simple object by detecting and then combining its features (lines or edges). However, this process is impaired when, in seeking to identify an object in clutter, your brain combines features over too large an area surrounding the object, failing to isolate the object's features from those of the clutter. This usually happens when the cluttered object is in peripheral vision (the corner of your eye), as shown in this demonstration:

R + ARE

Fix your eyes on the plus. It is easy to recognize the letter "R" if it is alone, as on the left. However, if the letter "R" is among other letters, it is much more difficult to recognize. This is "crowding."

"We can easily see a single bird flying in the sky because there is no crowding, but most of our visual world is cluttered, and each object that we identify must be isolated from the clutter," the researchers added. "When an object is not isolated, and therefore crowded, we cannot recognize it."

The critical spacing is greater for objects that are more peripheral (farther from fixation). Objects are crowded when their spacing is less than critical and uncrowded when their spacing is more than critical. This dichotomy defines an "uncrowded window" through which we are able to read and search. The size of the uncrowded window increases through childhood and accounts for the increase in reading speed.

Source: New York University

Explore further: Scientists 1 step closer to cell therapy for multiple sclerosis patients

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The problem of false balance when reporting on science

Jul 17, 2014

How do you know the people billed as science experts that you see, hear and read about in the media are really all that credible? Or have they been included just to create a perception of balance in the coverage ...

Era of astronomical discovery

Jul 08, 2014

For much of her professional life, MIT professor Nergis Mavalvala has been devoted to a singular goal: creating a device to detect gravitational waves. These ripples in the fabric of space-time—the signature ...

Recommended for you

Antioxidant biomaterial promotes healing

1 hour ago

When a foreign material like a medical device or surgical implant is put inside the human body, the body always responds. According to Northwestern University's Guillermo Ameer, most of the time, that response can be negative ...

Immune response may cause harm in brain injuries, disorders

3 hours ago

Could the body's own immune system play a role in memory impairment and cognitive dysfunction associated with conditions like chronic epilepsy, Alzheimer's dementia and concussions? Cleveland Clinic researchers believe so, ...

One route to malaria drug resistance found

7 hours ago

Researchers have uncovered a way the malaria parasite becomes resistant to an investigational drug. The discovery, at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, also is relevant for other infectious ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gmurphy
3.5 / 5 (2) Sep 25, 2008
subjectively, I was a aware of the "A", "R" and "E" instantly when I looked at them, however, I am well aware of the disparity between the objective and subjective. What's interesting here is that they've identified a process in the mind which automatically dissects our visual environment into "likely" segments. This segmentation process then optimises our perception for look into certain "spaces" (areas of our visual field) for the acquisition of information.
superhuman
4 / 5 (1) Sep 26, 2008
Somehow I am not convinced. Spacing is simply the smallest (so its size) crucial detail needed for correct recognition in many cases.

In "are" it is spacing but in " a r e " its not spacing (or at least not spacing between letters but between parts of letters, but in such interpretation of everything is spacing).
mellifluous
not rated yet Sep 26, 2008
I tend to speed read through things. I would think that the wider the spacing the harder this would be. Perhaps this is for a certain age level of reading? Or even if someone is not a speed reader? Does this also make a difference if it is fiction or non fiction? I tend to read fiction differently to non fiction.

Some initial thoughts.