Spacing, not size, matters in visual recognition, researchers find

Sep 25, 2008

You might think that the farthest distance at which you can hold a book and still read it quickly is determined by the size of the letters. However, New York University neuroscientists have concluded that it's the spacing between letters, not their size, that matters. In general, objects, such as letters, can be recognized only if they are separated by enough space, the "critical spacing." Objects closer than that spacing are "crowded" and cannot be identified. A broad review of this crowding phenomenon, appearing in the latest issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience, shows that this critical spacing is the same for all objects, including letters, animals, and furniture.

According to the authors, NYU Professor of Psychology and Neural Science Denis Pelli and Katharine Tillman, an undergraduate researcher in NYU's College of Arts and Science, the critical spacing is a key parameter in the brain's cortical architecture underlying object recognition.

"The idea that spacing limits object recognition could not be simpler, but it has been very hard to accept because it displaces a firmly held belief that visibility is limited by size, not spacing," Pelli and Tillman wrote.

The human visual system recognizes a simple object by detecting and then combining its features (lines or edges). However, this process is impaired when, in seeking to identify an object in clutter, your brain combines features over too large an area surrounding the object, failing to isolate the object's features from those of the clutter. This usually happens when the cluttered object is in peripheral vision (the corner of your eye), as shown in this demonstration:

R + ARE

Fix your eyes on the plus. It is easy to recognize the letter "R" if it is alone, as on the left. However, if the letter "R" is among other letters, it is much more difficult to recognize. This is "crowding."

"We can easily see a single bird flying in the sky because there is no crowding, but most of our visual world is cluttered, and each object that we identify must be isolated from the clutter," the researchers added. "When an object is not isolated, and therefore crowded, we cannot recognize it."

The critical spacing is greater for objects that are more peripheral (farther from fixation). Objects are crowded when their spacing is less than critical and uncrowded when their spacing is more than critical. This dichotomy defines an "uncrowded window" through which we are able to read and search. The size of the uncrowded window increases through childhood and accounts for the increase in reading speed.

Source: New York University

Explore further: Highly sensitive detection of malaria parasites

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Obsessive audits stop charities from doing their job

Feb 17, 2015

The goal of youth-centred charities is to provide a public benefit by helping and caring for young people in a variety of ways. The public, government, and funders should do their best to support these c ...

Google gives Lick Observatory $1 million

Feb 10, 2015

Google Inc. has given $1 million to the University of California's Lick Observatory in what astronomers hope is the first of many private gifts to support an invaluable teaching and research resource for ...

Exploring the universe with nuclear power

Feb 02, 2015

In the past four decades, NASA and other space agencies from around the world have accomplished some amazing feats. Together, they have sent manned missions to the Moon, explored Mars, mapped Venus and Mercury, ...

Recommended for you

Newly discovered hormone mimics the effects of exercise

20 hours ago

Scientists at the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology have discovered a new hormone that fights the weight gain caused by a high-fat Western diet and normalizes the metabolism - effects commonly associated ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gmurphy
3.5 / 5 (2) Sep 25, 2008
subjectively, I was a aware of the "A", "R" and "E" instantly when I looked at them, however, I am well aware of the disparity between the objective and subjective. What's interesting here is that they've identified a process in the mind which automatically dissects our visual environment into "likely" segments. This segmentation process then optimises our perception for look into certain "spaces" (areas of our visual field) for the acquisition of information.
superhuman
4 / 5 (1) Sep 26, 2008
Somehow I am not convinced. Spacing is simply the smallest (so its size) crucial detail needed for correct recognition in many cases.

In "are" it is spacing but in " a r e " its not spacing (or at least not spacing between letters but between parts of letters, but in such interpretation of everything is spacing).
mellifluous
not rated yet Sep 26, 2008
I tend to speed read through things. I would think that the wider the spacing the harder this would be. Perhaps this is for a certain age level of reading? Or even if someone is not a speed reader? Does this also make a difference if it is fiction or non fiction? I tend to read fiction differently to non fiction.

Some initial thoughts.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.