Small glaciers -- not large -- account for most of Greenland's recent loss of ice, study shows

Sep 15, 2008
The image above shows the southeast region of Greenland that was the focus of Howat's study. The color scale shows changes in ice thickness over time. Photo courtesy of Ian Howat.

(PhysOrg.com) -- The recent dramatic melting and breakup of a few huge Greenland glaciers have fueled public concerns over the impact of global climate change, but that isn't the island's biggest problem.

A new study shows that the dozens of much smaller outflow glaciers dotting Greenland's coast together account for three times more loss from the island's ice sheet than the amount coming from their huge relatives.

In a study just published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, scientists at Ohio State University reported that nearly 75 percent of the loss of Greenland ice can be traced back to small coastal glaciers.

Ian Howat, an assistant professor of earth sciences and researcher with Ohio State's Byrd Polar Research Center, said their discovery came through combining the best from two remote sensing techniques. It provides perhaps the best estimate so far of the loss to Greenland's ice cap, he says.

Aside from Antarctica, Greenland has more ice than anywhere else on earth. The ice cap covers four-fifths of the island's surface, is 1,491 miles (2,400 kilometers) long and 683 miles (1,100 kilometers) wide, and can reach 1.8 miles (3 kilometers) deep at its thickest point.

As global temperatures rise, coastal glaciers flow more quickly to the sea, with massive chunks breaking off at the margins and forming icebergs. And while some of the largest Greenland glaciers – such as the Jakobshavn and Petermann glaciers on the northern coast – are being closely monitored, most others are not.

Howat and his colleagues concentrated on the southeastern region of Greenland, an area covering about one-fifth of the island's 656,373 square miles (1.7 million square kilometers). They found that while two of the largest glaciers in that area – Kangerdlugssuaq and Helheim – contribute more to the total ice loss than any other single glaciers, the 30 or so smaller glaciers there contributed 72 percent of the total ice lost.

"We were able to see for the first time that there is widespread thinning at the margin of the Greenland ice sheet throughout this region.

"We're talking about the region that is within 62 miles (100 kilometers) from the ice edge. That whole area is thinning rapidly," he said.

Howat says that all of the glaciers are changing within just a few years and that the accelerated loss just spreads up deeper into the ice sheet.

To reach their conclusions, the researchers turned to two ground-observing satellites. One of them, ICESAT (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite), does a good job of gauging the ice over vast expanses which were mostly flat.

On the other hand, ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) does a better job at seeing changes at the steeper, less-flat margins of the ice sheet, Howat said.

"We simply merged those data sets to give us for the first time a picture of ice elevation change – the rate at which the ice is either going up or down – at a very high (656-foot or 200-meter) resolution.

"They are a perfect match for each other," Howat said.

"What we found is the entire strip of ice over the southeast margin, all of these glaciers, accelerated and they are just pulling the entire ice sheet with it," he said.

Howat said that their results show that such new findings don't necessarily require new types of satellites. "These aren't very advanced techniques or satellites. Our work shows that by combining satellite data in the right way, we can get a much better picture of what's going on," Howat said.

Provided by Ohio State University

Explore further: Volcano in south Japan erupts, disrupting flights

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NASA support key to glacier mapping efforts

Sep 30, 2014

Thanks in part to support from NASA and the National Science Foundation, scientists have produced the first-ever detailed maps of bedrock beneath glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica. This new data will help ...

Is Australia's claim to Antarctica at risk?

Oct 17, 2014

While Australia's commitment to a 20-year plan for Antarctica has been welcomed by some it has also raised concerns over the nation's ability to fulfil a credible research role in the south polar region.

Operation IceBridge turns five

Oct 17, 2014

In May 2014, two new studies concluded that a section of the land-based West Antarctic ice sheet had reached a point of inevitable collapse. Meanwhile, fresh observations from September 2014 showed sea ice ...

Rising sea levels of 1.8 meters in worst-case scenario

Oct 14, 2014

The climate is getting warmer, the ice sheets are melting and sea levels are rising – but how much? The report of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2013 was based on the best ...

Recommended for you

Bridgmanite: World's most abundant mineral finally named

12 hours ago

A team of geologists in the U.S. has finally found an analyzable sample of the most abundant mineral in the world allowing them to give it a name: bridgmanite. In their paper published in the journal Science, the te ...

Volcano in south Japan erupts, disrupting flights

18 hours ago

A volcano in southern Japan is blasting out chunks of magma in the first such eruption in 22 years, causing flight cancellations and prompting warnings to stay away from its crater.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

D666
3.3 / 5 (6) Sep 15, 2008
I don't understand why this is news. Of course you're going to get most of the loss at the margins. Geez! Exposure to above-zero air from offshore, exposure of more surface area because the shore side is exposed, higher surface/volume ratio, etc.

GrayMouser
3 / 5 (3) Sep 15, 2008
I'm in shock... For once D666 and I agree.
Quantum_Conundrum
2.6 / 5 (5) Sep 15, 2008
Yeah, this article is retarded.

I would be surprised if ice melted from the inside out. Now THAT would make a good article.
gmurphy
1 / 5 (2) Sep 16, 2008
I disagree with the general tone of apathy. Science usually consists of laborious, tedious and time consuming work, carefully linking all the threads together. The proof for Global Warming is strong because of this kind of unglamorous work. That said, it would be more interesting if the ice was melting from the inside out AND the cause of the melting was the decepticons.
h1ghj3sus
3 / 5 (4) Sep 16, 2008
stop trying to prevent GW. Just get ready for it already... it is a naturally occurring event which is independent of human's meddling.
NotParker
3 / 5 (4) Sep 16, 2008
The Antarctic Ice Cap has been melting for 14,000 years.

It wasn't man or SUV's.

"A massive and unusually abrupt rise in sea level about 14,200 years ago was caused by the partial collapse of ice sheets in Antarctica, a new study has shown, in research that solves a mystery scientists have been heatedly debating for more than a decade. In less than 500 years at the end of the last Ice Age, this event caused the Earth's sea level to rise about 70 feet. That's about four times faster than sea levels were rising most of the time during this period, and at least 20 times faster than the sea level is currently rising."

http://www.scienc...ys.shtml

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.