Iran's space agency says it will send man to space

August 21, 2008

Iran's space agency says it will send man to space

Enlarge

A Saturday Aug. 16, 2008 photo taken at an undisclosed location in Iran which the Fars News Agency claim shows Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, second right, looking at an Iranian satellite launching vehicle. Iran has test launched a rocket it plans to use to carry a research satellite into orbit, state television reported Sunday. Saturday's test of the two-stage rocket, called the Safir-e Omid, or Ambassador of Peace, was successful, state TV said, broadcasting images of the nighttime launch. The rocket released equipment that beamed flight data back to ground control, said Reza Taghipoor, the head of Iran\'s Space Agency, in a live television interview. (AP Photo/Fars News Agency, Vahid Reza Alaei)

(AP) -- State TV says Iran's space agency aims to send an astronaut to space within 10 years.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

4.4 /5 (5 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

NeilFarbstein
Aug 21, 2008

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
Its probably a cover for their plan to nuke Israel and New York City.
Modernmystic
Aug 21, 2008

Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Well if they can send a man up there nuking New York and Israel aren't too far behind.
bobwinners
Aug 21, 2008

Rank: 3.6 / 5 (5)
Hey, they already have a space cadet named Ahmadinejad. I volunteer him!!! Put him in training right now. It's never too soon!
seanpu
Aug 22, 2008

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
If its not for peaceful purposes i can't blame them, with a vicious neighbor like Israel nearby I'd get a couple of nukes around me too.
Modernmystic
Aug 22, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
A neighbor so vicious they've had nukes for decades and not used them despite constant harassment and delibrate rocket fire into civillian areas for years on end. Not to mention wars of aggression brought on them from their "peace be upon you" Islamic neighbors.
seanpu
Aug 22, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
occupation without resistance is very difficult to achieve
Modernmystic
Aug 22, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
They won a war of aggression and they "occupy" the land...hmmm does that mean the United States is "occupying" most of the east coast?
Gregori
Aug 22, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
It's hardly a grand conspiracy that Iran would develop using ICBM's using this technology. Actually, it plain obvious since that's exactly what China, USSR and US have done before them!

It makes a lot of sense to develop such weapons when the world's primary military super power has invaded and occupied countries either side of your borders.

I doubt that they're planning to nuke Israel or New York. That wouldn't achieve anything since the inevitable US Israeli counter attack would wipe out Iran. No point in imposing islamic rule over a radioactive crater. However, the ABILITY to do that gives a country strategic leverage. For one thing, you're never going to be invaded!

That regime wants to maintain the present order, free of threats of being invaded by US, or bombed by Israel. If it just wanted to spite Israel without any regard for what would happen to itself - It could have that already with conventional weapons. Israel is a pretty small country, it wouldn't be to hard to destroy it conventionally!

Since that hasn't happened yet, It's safe to assume they're rational and interested in surviving with the current theocratic regime intact.

The good news about this is that even if its just for prestige, It will mean more nations will be able to participate in manned space exploration. That can only be a good thing, given how NASA is waning as a power in space exploration. Having a monopoly on space has caused this organization to slow. Competition from other nations will force it to compete again.

As well as providing competition for all the other players, having an Iran that can put people in space is better for international cooperation too. Missions that are too expensive for single states can be undertaken by several, spreading the cost :D

It also gives the middle east a very positive role model (whether you agree with its theocratic rule or not). The fact is that they're becoming a technological advanced and progressive country, not by buying it of Europe, USA or Russia, but by developing it themselves!
Modernmystic
Aug 22, 2008

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
OMG where to begin...

It's hardly a grand conspiracy that Iran would develop using ICBM's using this technology. Actually, it plain obvious since that's exactly what China, USSR and US have done before them!


This is supposed to make the rest of the world feel better how?

It makes a lot of sense to develop such weapons when the world's primary military super power has invaded and occupied countries either side of your borders.


Or you've been making threats to "wipe off the map" the world's superpower's ally.

I doubt that they're planning to nuke Israel or New York. That wouldn't achieve anything since the inevitable US Israeli counter attack would wipe out Iran. No point in imposing islamic rule over a radioactive crater.


Hitler wasn't a rational man either, and he basically told the world exactly what he was going to do before he did it. Saddam would have only needed to let in inspectors to avoid his fate and yet...here we are. Sorry I don't put much faith in the rationality of nationalist/religious extremist leaders.

However, the ABILITY to do that gives a country strategic leverage. For one thing, you're never going to be invaded!


With our missile bases in Poland they might not even have the ability to do such, even though they may think they do.

It could have that already with conventional weapons. Israel is a pretty small country, it wouldn't be to hard to destroy it conventionally!


BAHhahahahahahahhaha....oh wait you were serious weren't you? Have you read any of the literature on the history of arab/Israeli conventional conflicts? I doubt VERY much Iran is any kind of a conventional threat to Israel.

Since that hasn't happened yet, It's safe to assume they're rational and interested in surviving with the current theocratic regime intact.


Um no they just haven't been ABLE to do that yet, despite their best efforts in the past. Nuclear weapons may very well change the stakes, as they've already proven their aggressive genocidal intentions towards Israel.

It also gives the middle east a very positive role model (whether you agree with its theocratic rule or not). The fact is that they're becoming a technological advanced and progressive country, not by buying it of Europe, USA or Russia, but by developing it themselves!


LOL all you need is the money dude, there's nothing really to rocket science but reading a book and having the money to do it anymore.
MVV
Aug 24, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Iran has no way to launch even a cracker towars israel without being called afterwards "Iran gulf" , appearing in the turistic guides as "This water mass was , once upon a time , a country with a long history..."

Who knows , they can even take a liking to the space program. Lets not forget that the moon has a great simbolic significance for the muslims. The first muslim in the moon may attain a status just a little minor than the mahdi himself.
barkster
Aug 25, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
The best weapon to keep Iran from putting a man in orbit???

Bring back all the episodes of "PIGS IN SPAAAAAAACE!" with Persian/Farsi subtitles.

(Hell, if the Iraqi leadership actually thought Bart Simpson was a real guy, the wack-o theocrats in Iran would shit their pajamas over this.)
Rank 4.4 /5 (5 votes)
Tags

Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Distance of planets from stars and revolution
    created11 hours ago
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 11 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (6) | comments 27 | with audio podcast

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Space & Earth / Environment

created 9 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (5) | comments 6 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 11 hours ago | popularity 4.2 / 5 (5) | comments 2 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.8 / 5 (11) | comments 51

Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue

UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.

Space & Earth / Environment

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.4 / 5 (8) | comments 43


Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure

Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure – about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair – and you'll probably recognise its shape.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.