Universally speaking, Earthlings share a nice neighborhood

Aug 08, 2008
An artist's rendering of a Jupiter-like planet, the larger of the two planets pictured, orbiting a star outside our solar system. Here in our solar system, Jupiter may act as a "junk yard dog," protecting the Earth from comets, maintaining stability and sustaining life as we know it. New research finds stable solar systems such as ours to be the exception, rather than the rule in the universe. Credit: Artwork by Lynette Cook

We don't have spacecraft to take us outside our solar system--not yet, at least. Still, astronomers thought they had a pretty good understanding of how our solar system formed and in turn, how others formed. In the last dozen years, nearly 300 exoplanets have been discovered. Are the solar systems in which they reside indeed like our own?

Without knowledge or observations to the contrary, conventional knowledge said yes. Three Northwestern University researchers questioned that assumption and explored this question. What they learned is that the solar system in which the Earth orbits our sun is actually uncommon.

Edward Thommes, Soko Matsumura and Frederic Rasio were the first to develop large-scale, sophisticated computer simulations to model the formation of planetary systems from beginning to end. Because of computing limitations, earlier models provided only brief glimpses of the process. The surprising findings of their study titled, "Gas Disks to Gas Giants: Simulating the Birth of Planetary Systems," are detailed in the August 8, 2008 issue of Science magazine.

The researchers used a range of computer simulations to explore the formation of extra-solar planetary systems. They were able to show the action of a planet-forming circumstellar disk in three different starting condition scenarios at different intervals from the beginning of the universe to 500 million years of evolution. They found that our solar system represents the rare case in which big gas giants form, but do not migrate to the inner planetary system, and the orbits of all of the planets in the system are circular and stable.

"We now know that these other planetary systems don't look like the solar system at all," said Frederic A. Rasio, senior author of the Science paper, and a theoretical astrophysicist and professor of physics and astronomy in Northwestern's Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. "We now better understand the process of planet formation and can explain the properties of the strange exoplanets we've observed. We also know that the solar system is special and understand at some level what makes it special."

Source: National Science Foundation

Explore further: Hubble traces the halo of a galaxy more accurately than ever before

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Is our solar system weird?

Jul 18, 2014

Is our Solar System normal? Or is it weird? How does the Solar System fit within the strange star systems we've discovered in the Milky Way so far?

Peering into giant planets from in and out of this world

Jul 17, 2014

Lawrence Livermore scientists for the first time have experimentally re-created the conditions that exist deep inside giant planets, such as Jupiter, Uranus and many of the planets recently discovered outside ...

Looking back at the Jupiter crash 20 years later

Jul 16, 2014

(Phys.org) —Twenty years ago, human and robotic eyes observed the first recorded impact between cosmic bodies in the solar system, as fragments of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 slammed into the atmosphere of Jupiter.

Asteroid Vesta to reshape theories of planet formation

Jul 16, 2014

EPFL researchers have a better understanding of the asteroid Vesta and its internal structure, thanks to numerical simulations and data from the space mission Dawn. Their findings, published today in Nature, questi ...

Recommended for you

Lives and deaths of sibling stars

37 minutes ago

This beautiful star cluster, NGC 3293, is found 8000 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Carina (The Keel). This cluster was first spotted by the French astronomer Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille in ...

Fermi finds a 'transformer' pulsar

17 hours ago

(Phys.org) —In late June 2013, an exceptional binary containing a rapidly spinning neutron star underwent a dramatic change in behavior never before observed. The pulsar's radio beacon vanished, while at ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

seanpu
1.7 / 5 (6) Aug 08, 2008
that is planetary systems formed under laws of gravity and gas laws alone. no input from electricity and plasma.
Gregori
3.3 / 5 (6) Aug 08, 2008
We lack the instrumentation sensitive enough to make accurate judgments about what are and what aren't common planetary systems.

When we're able to see all planets around a given star - then we can say something that's worth a damn!

Alexa
1.7 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2008
the orbits of all of the planets in the system are circular and stable
Well, these guys probably didn't realize, this is a typical behavior of all gravitational systems, which are sufficiently old and stabilized...;-) Of course, it requires to prolong the simulation and to consider subtle gravitational effects in it.

Do you know, the similar problem is with well known Schwarzschild solution of black holes? Such solution is steady-state, but it would require a longer time, then the age of Universe to establish under real circumstances - so it's completely unphysical one. Unfortunately, it still forms the base of most of contemporary black hole theories.
dirk_bruere
4.3 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2008
I would have been more impressed with the computer model if Hot Jupiters had been predicted *before* they were discovered. There's always a suspicion that maybe the model has been tweaked to fit the (now) known data.