Universally speaking, Earthlings share a nice neighborhood

Aug 08, 2008
An artist's rendering of a Jupiter-like planet, the larger of the two planets pictured, orbiting a star outside our solar system. Here in our solar system, Jupiter may act as a "junk yard dog," protecting the Earth from comets, maintaining stability and sustaining life as we know it. New research finds stable solar systems such as ours to be the exception, rather than the rule in the universe. Credit: Artwork by Lynette Cook

We don't have spacecraft to take us outside our solar system--not yet, at least. Still, astronomers thought they had a pretty good understanding of how our solar system formed and in turn, how others formed. In the last dozen years, nearly 300 exoplanets have been discovered. Are the solar systems in which they reside indeed like our own?

Without knowledge or observations to the contrary, conventional knowledge said yes. Three Northwestern University researchers questioned that assumption and explored this question. What they learned is that the solar system in which the Earth orbits our sun is actually uncommon.

Edward Thommes, Soko Matsumura and Frederic Rasio were the first to develop large-scale, sophisticated computer simulations to model the formation of planetary systems from beginning to end. Because of computing limitations, earlier models provided only brief glimpses of the process. The surprising findings of their study titled, "Gas Disks to Gas Giants: Simulating the Birth of Planetary Systems," are detailed in the August 8, 2008 issue of Science magazine.

The researchers used a range of computer simulations to explore the formation of extra-solar planetary systems. They were able to show the action of a planet-forming circumstellar disk in three different starting condition scenarios at different intervals from the beginning of the universe to 500 million years of evolution. They found that our solar system represents the rare case in which big gas giants form, but do not migrate to the inner planetary system, and the orbits of all of the planets in the system are circular and stable.

"We now know that these other planetary systems don't look like the solar system at all," said Frederic A. Rasio, senior author of the Science paper, and a theoretical astrophysicist and professor of physics and astronomy in Northwestern's Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. "We now better understand the process of planet formation and can explain the properties of the strange exoplanets we've observed. We also know that the solar system is special and understand at some level what makes it special."

Source: National Science Foundation

Explore further: Astronomer confirms a new "Super-Earth" planet

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mars mission boost welcomed by scientists

1 hour ago

University of Leicester scientists, who are closely involved in the European mission to Mars –ExoMars- have welcomed support from the Government for the project.

Cosmic impacts might help synthesize organic compounds

Dec 12, 2014

Bullets of ice shot at high speeds can deposit organic compounds on surfaces they strike. The new findings suggest that comets might, indeed, have helped deliver key ingredients of life to Earth and perhaps ...

Researchers look at Oort cloud asteroids

Dec 09, 2014

Sky & Telescope reports on "A fresh look at a nagging problem—asteroids moving in comet-like orbits" where the research "concludes that asteroids must make up about 4 percent of the vast, distant Oort C ...

Recommended for you

Kepler proves it can still find planets

23 hours ago

To paraphrase Mark Twain, the report of the Kepler spacecraft's death was greatly exaggerated. Despite a malfunction that ended its primary mission in May 2013, Kepler is still alive and working. The evidence ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

seanpu
1.7 / 5 (6) Aug 08, 2008
that is planetary systems formed under laws of gravity and gas laws alone. no input from electricity and plasma.
Gregori
3.3 / 5 (6) Aug 08, 2008
We lack the instrumentation sensitive enough to make accurate judgments about what are and what aren't common planetary systems.

When we're able to see all planets around a given star - then we can say something that's worth a damn!

Alexa
1.7 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2008
the orbits of all of the planets in the system are circular and stable
Well, these guys probably didn't realize, this is a typical behavior of all gravitational systems, which are sufficiently old and stabilized...;-) Of course, it requires to prolong the simulation and to consider subtle gravitational effects in it.

Do you know, the similar problem is with well known Schwarzschild solution of black holes? Such solution is steady-state, but it would require a longer time, then the age of Universe to establish under real circumstances - so it's completely unphysical one. Unfortunately, it still forms the base of most of contemporary black hole theories.
dirk_bruere
4.3 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2008
I would have been more impressed with the computer model if Hot Jupiters had been predicted *before* they were discovered. There's always a suspicion that maybe the model has been tweaked to fit the (now) known data.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.