Experts say tourists harming Machu Picchu

Jul 02, 2008 By VICTORIA BEKIEMPIS , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- An influx of tourists to Peru's famed Inca citadel of Machu Picchu may prompt UNESCO to add the jungle-shrouded ruins to its list of endangered World Heritage sites.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Explore further: Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Celebrations of place anchor free-floating Internet

May 06, 2014

The Internet has fallen in love with place. From wildly popular Instagrammers like the photographer behind Humans of New York, to globe-trotters leaving digital travel notes on the story-sharing site Findery, to cloud-based ...

Recommended for you

Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

1 hour ago

Oil services company Halliburton said Tuesday it would pay a $1.1 billion settlement over its role in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil rig blowout that led to the United States' most disastrous oil spill.

Underwater grass comeback bodes well for Chesapeake Bay

2 hours ago

The Susquehanna Flats, a large bed of underwater grasses near the mouth of the Susquehanna River, virtually disappeared from the upper Chesapeake Bay after Tropical Storm Agnes more than 40 years ago. However, ...

Clean air halves health costs in Chinese city

4 hours ago

Air pollution regulations over the last decade in Taiyuan, China, have substantially improved the health of people living there, accounting for a greater than 50% reduction in costs associated with loss of life and disability ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

snwboardn
2 / 5 (3) Jul 02, 2008
"Lumbreras, an independent, Lima-based archaeologist who has studied Machu Picchu for more than 40 years."

How many trails has your feet eroded, going up there to study it?
Bob_B
2.5 / 5 (2) Jul 02, 2008
Is there anyone else getting very annoyed by the image being displayed (over and over and over) of a child needing surgery?

Speaking for myself - I feel this is totally abusive to us as users (readers) of physorg.com
The image is porographic, totally without merit.

With the abuses xtians have been guilty of - there's NO WAY I'd ever send $ to these advertisements.

Why does the SALES department not feel we are being abused? Can they reply? I tried emailing Sales directly, but to no avail...they'd lose money, so why bother with what is excessive and gross, even if users prefer ads that are NOT gross and pornographic (www.dictionary.com: Lurid or sensational material)

PHYSORG.COM shows gross, pornographic images.
Excalibur
not rated yet Jul 03, 2008
You must be one of the unlucky ones to be seeing the same message so often, considering that they are dynamically served up an ad server, one which physorg does not control.

As for myself, I've yet to see the image that so annoys you.