Researchers call for independent body to monitor deaths in wars and other crises... and more

Jul 01, 2008

The accurate documentation of deaths during wars and other humanitarian emergencies is critical to grading the severity of the crisis and adjusting relief operations accordingly, and yet collection of data on death rates is often incomplete, say two researchers in this week's PLoS Medicine.

Accurate data on death rates, they say, can provide a basis for both "humanitarian" advocacy (i.e. calling for appropriate assistance) as well as "political" advocacy (for example, calling for compliance with international humanitarian law, a set of rules that seek to limit the effects of armed conflict for humanitarian reasons).

Francesco Checchi (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine), who has worked on mortality surveys in Darfur and Northern Uganda, and Les Roberts (Columbia University, New York), who has worked on mortality surveys in Iraq and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), say that the best tools for prospectively monitoring deaths were missing or deficient "in all recent high-mortality crises" with the exception of Bosnia.

The authors call for the establishment of a new independent body to ensure that the best measurement tools are used to oversee the documentation of deaths during crises.

"How many of the more than 3 million estimated to have died in the DRC because of war might still be alive," ask the authors, "if credible, crisis-wide mortality estimates had become available sooner, and been used to inform policy?"

The establishment of a technical, apolitical body dedicated to timely, systematic collection of valid mortality data, say Checchi and Roberts, especially in the least funded and publicized crises, could help to ensure that the DRC experience is not repeated.

"Such a body could also independently evaluate mortality study protocols and reports, promote best practice methods, and train a cadre of researchers to be deployed to emergent crises. Such a body could constitute a resource for relief agencies and improve the quality of press coverage and discussion around ongoing crises."

Citation: Checchi F, Roberts L (2008) Documenting mortality in crises: What keeps us from doing better? PLoS Med 5(7): e146. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050146. medicine.plosjournals.org/perl… journal.pmed.0050146

Source: Public Library of Science

Explore further: Errata frequently seen in medical literature

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Chernobyl: The true scale of the accident

Sep 06, 2005

20 years later a UN report provides definitive answers and ways to repair lives A total of up to four thousand people could eventually die of radiation exposure from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (NPP) accident nearly 20 ...

Recommended for you

Errata frequently seen in medical literature

10 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Errata, including those that may materially change the interpretation of data, are frequent in medical publications, according to a study published in the August issue of The American Journal of ...

Seven US-based researchers share $1.3M eyesight prize

Sep 10, 2014

Seven U.S.-based researchers are sharing a €1 million ($1.3 million) prize from a Portuguese foundation for their work developing treatment for angiogenic diseases of the retina, the leading cause of blindness in the developed ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Noumenon
not rated yet Jul 01, 2008
"The establishment of [...] apolitical body dedicated to timely..."

Its scary how niave the lefties can be. Instead of standardizing propaganda, how about preventing war altogether by 'understanding' its causes, like 'you' promised. We see how well the UN idea is doing,... can't even Unit to prevent Iran from getting nukes, even though no sane person trusts them,.... yet again the burden will fall on a few nations.