Is Indy chasing a fake?

May 23, 2008
Indiana Jones
Image: (c)2008 Lucasfilm

As Indiana Jones races against time to find an ancient crystal skull in his new movie adventure, he should perhaps take a moment to check its authenticity.

New research suggests that two well-known crystal skulls, in the British Museum and the Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, did not, after all, come from ancient Mexico. Academics now believe the British skull was made in 19th century Europe and the American one even more recently.

The British Museum bought its skull, a life-size carving from a single block of rock crystal from Tiffany and Company, New York in 1897. Its origins were unknown but there were suggestions it was of ancient Mexican origin. Human skulls worn as ornaments and displayed on racks were known to have featured in Aztec art.

The skull attracted a lot of public attention and speculation it was once thought to have healing powers. Crystal skulls have since featured in many books, articles and films, most recently in the new Steven Spielberg movie Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

However, there have been doubts about the authenticity of the skull since the 1930s. Now an international team has used the latest scientific techniques to examine the British Museum skull and a larger white quartz skull donated to the Smithsonian Institution in 1992.

Electron microscope analysis for tool marks found both skulls were carved with rotary disc-shaped tool – a technology which the Ancient Mexicans did not have. Analysis of the quartz in the British Museum skull suggests it was quarried from Brazil or Madagascar – far outside the Ancient Mexicans’ trading links.

The team, made up of experts from Cardiff University, the British Museum, the Smithsonian and Kingston University, concluded that neither skull could have been made in Mexico before the time of Columbus. They believe the British skull was created in Europe in the 19th century, and the Smithsonian’s shortly before it was bought in Mexico City in 1960.

Professor Ian Freestone, of Cardiff University’s School of History and Archaeology, said: “It is always disappointing when an intriguing artefact like a crystal skull turns out not to be genuine. However, it is important to be precise about what is authentic and what is fake if we are properly to understand our past. Maybe Indiana Jones will have better luck in his hunt for a real crystal skull!”

Source: Cardiff University

Explore further: Can science eliminate extreme poverty?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

How science debunked the ancient Aztec crystal skull hoax

Mar 06, 2013

They may have gained fame in the Steven Spielberg adventure film "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull," but those quartz-crystal skulls that once ranked as a great enigma of archaeology are certifiably fake. ...

Recommended for you

Egypt archaeologists find ancient writer's tomb

Apr 19, 2014

Egypt's minister of antiquities says a team of Spanish archaeologists has discovered two tombs in the southern part of the country, one of them belonging to a writer and containing a trove of artifacts including reed pens ...

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

Apr 18, 2014

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.8 / 5 (5) May 23, 2008
Or maybe they were carved by the previous advanced civilization that walked the earth, with technology provided from the extraterrestrial "Sun Gods"...
3.7 / 5 (6) May 23, 2008
No they were carved by crooked conmen to take money from gullible morons. As for Sun Gods, if you stare at the sun until you go blind the Sun Gods will cure you, try it.
3 / 5 (1) May 23, 2008
Because, of course, the Holy Grail and the Arc of the Covenant are real... or maybe, just maybe, Indy it makes for a good story.

Otherwise interesting article.
2 / 5 (1) May 24, 2008
...rotary disc-shaped tool %u2013 a technology which the Ancient Mexicans did not have ... ...analysis of the quartz in the British Museum skull SUGGESTS it was quarried from Brazil or Madagascar %u2013 far outside the Ancient Mexicans%u2019 trading links... They BELIEVE the British skull was created in Europe in the 19th century, and the Smithsonian%u2019s shortly before it was bought in Mexico City in 1960

Archeology is a lot of guess work. If we care to dig deep enough, many accepted "facts" had been quietly overturned over the centuries without any recriminations from the gullible public. Were they stating "facts" about food and drug issues, I expected the archaeologists would be sued out of business by now.
3 / 5 (1) May 24, 2008
Problem is the fakes are vastly more numerous than the genuine article. Here's the skepdic article on "crystal skulls":

Of course if Indy wanted a real quartz crystal skull he could always buy one:

More news stories

Clippers and coiners in 16th-century England

In 2017 a new £1 coin will appear in our pockets with a design extremely difficult to forge. In the mid-16th century, Elizabeth I's government came up with a series of measures to deter "divers evil persons" ...

Making graphene in your kitchen

Graphene has been touted as a wonder material—the world's thinnest substance, but super-strong. Now scientists say it is so easy to make you could produce some in your kitchen.