Genetically modified human embryo stirs criticism

May 12, 2008 By MALCOLM RITTER, AP Science Writer

(AP) -- News that scientists have for the first time genetically altered a human embryo is drawing fire from some watchdog groups that say it's a step toward creating "designer babies."



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Explore further: Researchers identify first drug targets in childhood genetic tumor disorder

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Wound healing: 'See-saw' switch sends cells on the march

17 minutes ago

Many genes are transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules that provide instructions for protein synthesis. Other genes encode regulatory RNAs known as 'microRNAs', which can block protein translation ...

Eco database to map landscape projects

7 minutes ago

Environmental projects which map some of the most important benefits we get from nature have been brought together for the first time in an online database, following national survey work by researchers in the University ...

Coral reefs 'ruled by earthquakes and volcanoes'

7 minutes ago

(Phys.org) —Titanic forces in the Earth's crust explain why the abundance and richness of corals varies dramatically across the vast expanse of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, a world-first study from the ...

Recommended for you

Obese British man in court fight for surgery

Jul 11, 2011

A British man weighing 22 stone (139 kilograms, 306 pounds) launched a court appeal Monday against a decision to refuse him state-funded obesity surgery because he is not fat enough.

2008 crisis spurred rise in suicides in Europe

Jul 08, 2011

The financial crisis that began to hit Europe in mid-2008 reversed a steady, years-long fall in suicides among people of working age, according to a letter published on Friday by The Lancet.

New food labels dished up to keep Europe healthy

Jul 06, 2011

A groundbreaking deal on compulsory new food labels Wednesday is set to give Europeans clear information on the nutritional and energy content of products, as well as country of origin.

Overweight men have poorer sperm count

Jul 04, 2011

Overweight or obese men, like their female counterparts, have a lower chance of becoming a parent, according to a comparison of sperm quality presented at a European fertility meeting Monday.

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

thales
2.3 / 5 (3) May 12, 2008
Well, they were working on stem-cell research, not designer babies. While ideally designed humans are a scary thought indeed, I'm more concerned about the creation of an alligator-human hybrid that destroys New York.
thinking
1.3 / 5 (3) May 13, 2008
How about experimenting on a downs syndrome child that is born.... whole lot easier to see what happens....what about experimenting (none consensually) on someone who has cancer and is non-viable? What about experminenting on orphans... no body wants them.. if you get young ones that are hard to place... you can carry out a lot of useful experiments that will bring about benifit to those of us who are valuable to society...

If you haven't caught it.... I am being sarcastic...

A human life is valuable, and every person... from conception to natual death... deserves respect. Experimenting on humans,if its not acceptable on those born, is not acceptable to those not born.

BTW.... for those that care... I'm not Catholic...
ShadowRam
4 / 5 (4) May 13, 2008
Whats wrong with designer babies?! seriously?
How do we accept plastic surgery, and yet not this?

Genetic and robotic augmentation is just a natural evolutionary step.

General public really need to stop fearing this.
Augmentation is coming, whether people like it or not.

It'll be used for good and bad, just like every other technology.
bhiestand
3.7 / 5 (3) May 13, 2008
Thanks, ShadowRam. I'm glad somebody said it. It seems like the best argument against it so far is "but it will make people who aren't genetically enhanced look bad!" Sorry, but if your kid is born with an IQ under 90, he already looks bad. If your kid is born with horseface syndrome, he already looks bad. But if there's a chance I can have a child that will never have the prevalent diseases in my family: Lupus, diabetes, cardiovascular... I want that right. Why should our children have to suffer just because some Luddites are afraid of technology?
thinking
1 / 5 (3) May 13, 2008
The point is not curing deformities, or curing deseases most people agree with that. The question is, is it moral to experiment on, kill, deform, inocent unconsenting humans to acheive that goal.

If I had a downs syndrome child, I would protect him/her as much as I would a normal child. I would protect my newborn, just as much as my older children. An unborn child, is just that, a child. Anyone who denies this fact, has less common sense than a flat earther.

Lets have an honest debate and lets be honest, people who are in favor of this type of experiments, are actually in favor of experimenting on and sacrificing unwanted children so that they can improve their lives and the lives of wanted children.

So is it moral to kill and experment on unwanted humans, to improve the lives of those deamed valuable?
Mercury_01
2 / 5 (1) May 13, 2008
YES. it is, but thats not what theyre doing. they diddnt take someones retarded baby, they grew one in a bottle. Are you aware of where much of our modern medical knowledge came from? Amoral experimentation on unwilling victms. Thats where. You cant be the judge of cause and effect.
Good things come from evil intent and evil things come of good intent. Furthermore, Who are you to say whats good or bad in the first place? If yellowstone blew up today and instantly killed a hundred thousand people, causing a mini ice age to last a hundred years, you might say thats bad, but in the same breath, you would bless God's good earth. The good cant exist without the bad, plain and simple.
Human technology is just an inevitable extension of that axiom. Our power comes from the earth just the same as that volcano. destruction is also inevitable, but thats just part of existing on the physical plane. get with the program or dont come down here!
Whats with peoples obsession over suffering anyway?
ofidiofile
not rated yet Jun 12, 2008
for all those who think embryo=person: read some biology, for godsakes! is cutting down an oak the same as crushing an acorn?

yes, an embryo is a member of the human SPECIES proper; but then again, so are HeLa cells. it's not even till the fetal stage of development that the pre-born have a central nervous system (something that i'm fairly certain is necessary to have a PERSON). but no, folks hear 'embryo" and think "baby".

More news stories

Heart failure accelerates male 'menopause'

Heart failure accelerates the aging process and brings on early andropausal syndrome (AS), according to research presented today at the Heart Failure Congress 2013. AS, also referred to as male 'menopause', was four times ...

Feds fight morning-after pill age ruling in NY

(AP)—Department of Justice lawyers have again asked a federal appeals court in New York to delay lifting age restrictions and prescription requirements on an emergency contraceptive popularly known as the morning-after ...