Microsoft not ruling out Windows XP extension

Apr 24, 2008 By AOIFE WHITE, AP Business Writer

(AP) -- Microsoft Corp. CEO Steve Ballmer offered a glimmer of hope on Thursday to fans of the company's Windows XP operating system, saying the company may reconsider its decision to stop selling it soon.

Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Explore further: Model will unlock mysteries of the voice

Recommended for you

Model will unlock mysteries of the voice

16 hours ago

Swedish researchers are leading the development of the world's first comprehensive model of the human voice, which could contribute to better voice care, voice prosthetics, talking robots and teaching opportunities.

Patented system better secures digitally stored data

May 21, 2013

(Phys.org) —Arizona State University computer scientist Gail-Joon Ahn has been granted a U.S. patent for a novel identity management system that helps protect personal identity information stored on digital devices.

UC Davis startup changes listening experience

May 20, 2013

Fifteen years of research at the University of California, Davis, is being turned into commercial products by Dysonics, a startup company based in San Francisco. Since becoming the first "graduate" from the Engineering Translational ...

Ecologists warn of overreliance on unvetted computer source code by researchers

May 17, 2013

(Phys.org) —A team of scientists, led by ecologist Lucas Joppa of Microsoft Research, has published a commentary piece in the journal Science, highlighting what they say is a growing problem in research efforts. They s ...

Facebook and Twitter jump on Google glasses (Update)

May 16, 2013

Facebook and Twitter launched applications Thursday for Google glasses as developers rushed to learn more about tailoring software for the Internet-linked eyewear yet to hit the market.

Research finds new channels to trigger mobile malware

May 16, 2013

(Phys.org) —Researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) have uncovered new hard-to-detect methods that criminals may use to trigger mobile device malware that could eventually lead to targeted ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Corban

3.3 / 5 (3) Apr 24, 2008

This irrational hatred of Microsoft is retarded. I expect more from the readers of Physorg. Don't forget that every corporation is made up of people just like you and I. This Goliath mentality is something I'd expect from the New Age people.

earls

1 / 5 (1) Apr 24, 2008

Haha, I love the picture.

I feel that there are some pretty rational reasons to dislike them strongly. Just how do you go about being one of if not the richest company in the world and produce products of such mediocre value?

Corban, I don't know if you and Gopher are computer techs or have ever done extensive technical service work on Windows machines, but it's pretty obvious from my experience they go OUT OF THEIR WAY to make things more difficult than they need to be. And just when they start getting things right, they take two steps back with Vista. While I will continue to use XP, I've had my experiences with Vista and it most definitely has some perks and very nice features... But there's tons of dumbass simple shit and annoyances from as far back as Win95 that they refuse to address or continually over look.

All of their products are "lock ins." Interoperability only comes in once they're paid off by "collaborators." When Digital Rights Management became and issue and RIAA start crying - who was the first on the scene to lock everything down and keep us in the stone age?!

As "King of IT" they don't appear to stand for in my eyes the betterment or advancement of society and only wish to hold us back for no other reason than a quick buck.

And so may argue "oh well that's their right, that's capitalism for you!"

Well, this is my opinion for you - and our attitudes and behaviors don't make me any friend of them and vice versa.

Google has another whole different vision, openness, interconnectivity, sharing, collaboration, a vision of the future... And they still manage to make money doing it. Maybe in the end they'll turn out to be the next Microsoft and will be a bunch of control freak jackholes... But I doubt it, and in the mean time I'm going to enjoy Microsoft's downfall due to their draconian approaches to technology.

gopher65

3 / 5 (2) Apr 24, 2008

I agree completely Earls. I can't stand Microsoft and the bad products that they put out. Vista sucks. What I don't like is when Apple and Sony fanbois ignore the flaws in "their" companies (as if they control them or something:P), and spew this emotional hatred and vile in the direction of Microsoft. If people were FAIR in their hatred of these companies (like I am), it wouldn't bother me.

Be an equal opportunity hater;). Treat all companies equally based on their actions. Fanbois and slambois are both simply irrational idiots who ignore the evidence and make decisions based on how they "feel" about a company. Please. Grow up. These companies aren't "good" or "evil". Every last one of them is out of their shareholders and nothing more. Google isn't "good" and Microsoft isn't "evil". They are both perfectly neutral organizations, who are out for nothing but profit.

If you want to say something like, "Based on Microsoft's past lack of support for product type XXXX, I won't be purchasing this type of product from them in the future unless the company undergoes drastic changes", then I'll post "Dude, I so agree with you". If you say, "I hate %##@!) Microsoft, and every person that works there is a traitor to humanity!!1111!!", then I'm going to rate you down for being an emo idiot.

Now individual execs, those you can hate. Ballmer for instance is a freaking idiot.

StevenL

3 / 5 (2) Apr 24, 2008

Google isn't open, they say their open for image. Google ad tech is copyrighted and not shared. As an advertiser I found Google to a convenient but pricey solution, as a webmaster the payouts are very low.

Is Google bad for this? No, they are just doing business, just like MS or any other company.

out7x

1 / 5 (1) Apr 25, 2008

Nothing about Vista advantages over XP. Nor costs.

StevenL

not rated yet Apr 25, 2008

First, do not resort to name calling.

Now, on topic:
I am not saying Google should be free and open; they are not free and open.

All true.

Google vigorously defends its copyrights, patents, and trademarks so that others don't use them for free.

They refuse to release any information that might give away information about the technology, such as data involving searches for child pornography or terrorism.

Google posts pictures of people and property online without consent, not illegal but creepy.

Google puts many pages of text from copyrighted books online with out the consent of the owner of the copyright. They win court cases because they only post pages that have been previously uploaded on public servers, they stopped scanning books. Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's right.

Google continued to post news stories from Copiepresse even though they didn't want to be posted on Google or Google News. They had to be forced by a court to remove listing and excerpts.

earls

not rated yet Apr 25, 2008

First, who's calling you names? I simply suggested you don't know what you're talking about, which you now have made even more clear.

"Google hands over data on suspected pedophiles to Brazil"
http://www.breitb...tfimgehd&show_article=1

And there's multiple other examples of them doing similar deeds.

You say they're not open yet all you do is point out how their openness is "offensive" or problematic to, I assume you, and others.

And I've yet to pay a dime for gmail, google docs or google maps among many other services and software they provide COMPLETELY FREE OF CHARGE.

But whatever, you're exactly the type of person Gopher is talking about, irrational.

Rate away, friend.

StevenL

5 / 5 (2) Apr 26, 2008

From the very article you source: " Authorities had threatened Google with criminal and civil lawsuits if it did not comply with opening the private online photo albums of users under suspicion."

They are not free, advertising pays for it. Some parts don't have direct adversing but are still a result of conglomerate activities.

Use Gmail? notice the ads in Gmail are tied to the content of the messages? Don't you think that is a violation of privacy assumed?

On a side note, I use Gmail and Google Search regularly because I can ignore ads. But it is not free, my time and attention are spent at the cost of ads.

On openness, I point out their hypocrisies: Openness is great, by their standards, as long as it is not their intellectual property.

earls

5 / 5 (1) Apr 26, 2008

Steven, check it, I'm not saying Google is a god of a company or this that and the other, but they're worlds away from the pit that is Microsoft and their outlook and momentum comes off to me as a much more positive aura. They are definitely not without they're flaws, as you and I are, but if I had to pick a winner from the insufferable options available, Google's at the top of my list.

Privacy is a fine line that has been debated over the ages by the likes of the supreme court... The ninth amendment came at great expense, as and as we venture into a new digital and virtual frontier the line is constantly being redrawn.

As far as their ads go, I block them too, myself. But some code that matches words in my email to words in a database to display an ad hardly feels like an invasion of privacy that would be something along the lines of the NSA tapping my phone lines.

I like your last point the best, and honestly it's the truth... we can only hope they realize the folly of their ways OR they're just making strategic moves to be competitive in the idiotic copyright/patent laden capitalist market place we "thrive" in today.

cheers.

More news stories