Researchers find the ties that bind electrons in high-temperature superconductivity

Apr 10, 2008
Atomic Scale Maps of Electron Pairing in High-temperature Superconductors
The two figures show the results obtained with a specialized scanning tunneling microscope at temperatures well above and well below when the electrons pair up in high-temperature superconductors. The top figure shows an atomic scale map of the strength (delta) for pairing of electrons while superconducting, with red showing the strongest pairing and blue the weakest. The bottom figure shows a measurement related to electron-electron interaction on the exact same atomic sites at a temperature, well above the superconducting transition temperature, when electrons repel each other. The surprising connection between these two measurements is the main finding of the paper published in Science by the team from Princeton. Credit: Yazdani Group

For more than 20 years since the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity, scientists have been debating the underlying physical mechanism for this exotic phenomenon, which has the potential to revolutionize the electrical power distribution network.

They've argued at length over the origin of what some have imagined to be a microscopic "glue" that binds the electrons into pairs so they glide effortlessly, overcoming their normal repulsion in typical metals. Is it magnetism or vibrations in the lattice structure of the material or something else"

Now, provocative results yielded by two years of experiments carried out at Princeton University have a group of scientists saying that high-temperature superconductivity does not hinge on a magical glue binding electrons together. The secret to superconductivity, they say, may rest instead on the ability of electrons to take advantage of their natural repulsion in a complex situation.

Reporting in the April 11 issue of the journal Science, the team has uncovered an unexpected connection between the behavior of electrons when they pair up -- a key requirement for superconductivity -- and when the electrons are repelling one another at temperatures far above the critical temperature at which a material superconducts. Their experiments have shown that electrons exhibit a characteristic behavior when repelling each other that, strangely enough, signals their special talent for pairing and flowing without resistance when these complex materials are cooled to low temperatures.

"It appears that the electrons with the strongest repulsion in one situation are the most adept at superconductivity in another," said Ali Yazdani, a professor of physics at Princeton and the senior author of the paper. "It's counterintuitive, but that's what's happening."

High-temperature superconductors are ceramic materials that can conduct electricity across huge distances without losing any energy. They are also relatively cheap to make and have enormous potential in many areas of technology.

Superconductivity was first observed in mercury in 1911 by the Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes. When he cooled the material to the temperature of liquid helium, 4 degrees Kelvin (-452F, -269C), its resistance suddenly disappeared. Scientists in later years would come to understand low-temperature superconductivity as a phenomenon that occurs when electrons interact with vibrations of the material's lattice structure and join into pairs that are able to travel through a conductor without being scattered by atoms.

The copper oxide, "high-temperature" superconductors that have been intensely studied since they were discovered in 1986 can become superconducting at higher temperatures than the older materials -- up to about 150 Kelvin (-253F, -123C) -- making them of greater interest to industry. They can be cooled with liquid nitrogen, which is cheaper than liquid helium. But do electrons bond in these materials, scientists have wondered, the same general way as in the lower temperature materials"

The team with the new results has determined they do not.

The findings came as a result of an effort to track down physical indicators of the microscopic "glue," which in the case of low-temperature superconductors are known to show up in delicate measurements of quantum properties of superconducting electrons. In the 1960s, scientists at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey, conducting such experiments, proved beyond a doubt that lattice vibrations bind electrons, paving the way for them to flow in low-temperature superconductors.

Until now, scientists have not been able to repeat the Bell Labs experiments in high-temperature superconducting material. The ceramic conductors, which consist of up to five different elements, have been particularly challenging to prepare for such precision measurements. Researchers have found it impossible to perform similar measurements on the highest quality crystals without destroying their superconducting properties. The Princeton team triumphed by taking a novel approach and using a specialized scanning tunneling microscope with unique tracking capabilities. This technique allowed the researchers to fix their sight on the same atom, as the electrons moving in the sample went from repelling each other at high temperatures to pairing up at low temperatures.

Other recent searches in the microscopic realm for "glue," using different techniques, have turned up conflicting evidence. "This is a very controversial subject, partly because of the complexity of the material, which has a varying chemical structure on the atomic scale," Yazdani said.

"What we have found is that the traditional signatures of what some might call the 'glue' are there -- we can measure them with high accuracy on the atomic scale," he added. "They don't seem to control the formation of the superconducting pairs, though. They are more like spectators."

Having developed the ability to measure with high precision how nature allows electron pairs to form, the team, which included postdoctoral fellow Abhay Pasupathy and graduate students Aakash Pushp and Kenjiro Gomes, looked to see if there were other types of experimental signatures that could give clues to the mechanism of pairing. Their microscope gave them a big advantage as it allowed them to visualize electrons' quantum behavior in these complex materials with varying chemical structure on the atomic scale. To their surprise, they found that atomic locations of the sample in which electrons show signs of stronger repulsion for each other -- at very high temperature -- formed the strongest bonded pairs of electrons at low temperatures. This observation runs contrary to the behavior of electrons in low-temperature superconducting materials, in which electron-electron repulsion is not conducive to electron pairing up and superconductivity.

They found that when the samples were heated up to very high temperatures at which electrons no longer paired up, the electrons that had been superconducting at colder temperatures exhibited unique quantum properties at warmer temperatures indicating they possessed extremely strong repulsive forces.

Unlike the electrons studied in low-temperature superconducting materials, the electrons in high-temperature superconductors that are most likely to bond and flow effortlessly are the ones that repel others the strongest when the environment is not conducive to superconductivity.

While these experiments alone may not end the 20-year debate on what causes high-temperature superconductivity, they have at least one long-time proponent of the importance of electron-electron repulsion in the mechanism paying close attention. "The data is a gold mine which we're only beginning to exploit," said Philip Anderson, Princeton's Joseph Henry Professor of Physics, Emeritus, who won a physics Nobel in 1977 and was not involved in the research.

The scientists studied a compound made of strontium, bismuth, calcium and copper oxide. They used a specially rigged scanning tunneling microscope with a probe so small its tip is a single atom wide. Positioned a hair's breadth above the sample, the device can move in increments smaller than an atom and measure current that flows between the tip and the surface.

The team also included other researchers from Princeton, the University of Illinois-Urbana/Champaign and the U.S. Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory, as well as Osaka University and the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Research, both in Japan.

The Princeton scientists worked in the Princeton Nanoscale Microscopy Laboratory, a state-of-the-art, ultra-low-noise lab constructed at the site of an old cyclotron in the basement of Jadwin Hall. Yazdani and his group study condensed matter physics, searching for simple, unifying explanations for complicated phenomena observed in liquids and solids.

Scientists hope the findings will help crack the 20-year puzzle and may also boost efforts to find new varieties of materials that become superconducting at ever-higher temperatures. Such materials would make practical the dream of a new electrical world with high-powered computers, magnetically levitating trains and super-efficient power transmission lines.

Source: Princeton University

Explore further: Scientists capture ultrafast snapshots of light-driven superconductivity

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Novel technique opens door to better solar cells

Apr 14, 2014

A team of scientists, led by Assistant Professor Andrivo Rusydi from the Department of Physics at the National University of Singapore's (NUS) Faculty of Science, has successfully developed a technique to ...

Recommended for you

Progress in the fight against quantum dissipation

4 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Scientists at Yale have confirmed a 50-year-old, previously untested theoretical prediction in physics and improved the energy storage time of a quantum switch by several orders of magnitude. ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

nano999
2.3 / 5 (4) Apr 10, 2008
Praise Science!
zevkirsh
2.3 / 5 (4) Apr 10, 2008
all hail science!
Alexa
3.3 / 5 (4) Apr 10, 2008
"..it appears that the electrons with the strongest repulsion in one situation are the most adept at superconductivity in another..."

This is still a very clasical property of standard Cooper pairing (consider the simulation bellow)...

http://superstrun...vity.htm

http://superstrun...zari.jpg

It basically means, the electrons compressed in crystal lattice are helping the others to pass through latice holes & hills by alternate pushing and pulling. Therefore the group of electron can pass through holes cooperativelly without lost of energy as a single particle.
h0dges
3.7 / 5 (3) Apr 10, 2008
Interesting theory Alexa.
Also interesting how this article did not the term 'cooper pairs' once.
earls
2 / 5 (2) Apr 10, 2008
Good call Alexa. So cooling the atoms brings the electrons closer together which then assume the behavior you describe. Nifty.
Ragtime
2 / 5 (8) Apr 10, 2008
The Aether Wave Theory (AWT) explains the formation of boson condensate by foam model. Inside the condensing particle system the motion of particle will remain constrained to subtle foamy density fluctuations, which can be modelled by condensation of supercritical liquid. No wonder, even the interior of neutron stars or black holes should behaves like superfluid as well. By AWT the observable Universe is formed by interior of some black hole too, therefore the vacuum can be considered as a boson condensate as well (the foamy fluctuations of it are forming the "space-time fabric", i.e. quantum foam).

http://superstrun...logy.gif
http://superstrun...crit.gif

We can observe the formation of the Fermi gas foam on the picture at the beginning of article: the foam of electrons is apparently condensing under cooling by the same way, like the real supercritical vapor.

The superconductivity trick is, the electrons will move along such foamy density fluctuations in transversal waves, they don't penetrate the rest of electron Fermi gas, so they move through it like so called the capillary waves at the water surface without friction. Therefore the spreading of such waves isn't affected by environment.

You can consider for example the article here in connection with capillary wave spreading. The whirligigs are moving along surface of water like electrons in condensate without emanating of waves, i.e. without lost of energy. The magnetic field will force the electrons to move in circles too, so they'll start to emanate waves like circling whirligigs and the superconductivity effect dissapear.

http://www.physor...528.html

The problem of current generation of HT superconductors is, they're composed of 2D hyperlattices, so that the electron foam is too degenerated here. The trick in HT superconductivity is to force the formation of electron Fermi gas foam by analogous 3D structure of material, the lattice constant of which will match those of electron foam. By my opinion, the room temperature superconductors are really possible, the physical limit is in low critical current density achievable, because every electric current generates the magnetic field, which destroys the superconductivity.
Enthalpy
3 / 5 (1) Apr 13, 2008
I still don't understand why there should be any link between pairing and superconductivity. In any plastic or ceramic, electrons are paired up to the melting point, but these materials use to be good insulators.

For decades - more or less since YBaCuO were discovered - nearly every experiment speaks AGAINST Cooper pairs.

Why do all newspapers try to cast observation into the dying - if not dead - BCS theory? Just because people learnt it at school? Bad reason!
Enthalpy
4 / 5 (1) Apr 13, 2008
Also, focussing on energy transport is the wrong direction.

Superconductors have been fantastic for decades to make magnets. They are fantastic right now to make slow electric machines for boats, and maybe in wind turbines some day. They may separate cheaply oxygen from nitrogen.

Most of their uses are still undiscovered, as were the uses for lasers when the first laser light was produced. But transporting electricity won't be a big use any time soon, as aluminium is better (cheaper, more reliable) for that.

More fantastic uses will be found. But not where we expect them.
AgentG
4.7 / 5 (3) Apr 14, 2008
Very well written article, with sufficient detail and clarity to allow one to understand what is really going on.

More news stories

Down's chromosome cause genome-wide disruption

The extra copy of Chromosome 21 that causes Down's syndrome throws a spanner into the workings of all the other chromosomes as well, said a study published Wednesday that surprised its authors.

Researchers see hospitalization records as additional tool

Comparing hospitalization records with data reported to local boards of health presents a more accurate way to monitor how well communities track disease outbreaks, according to a paper published April 16 in the journal PLOS ON ...

Ebola virus in Africa outbreak is a new strain

The Ebola virus that has killed scores of people in Guinea this year is a new strain—evidence that the disease did not spread there from outbreaks in some other African nations, scientists report.