The bombardier beetle, power venom, and spray technologies

Apr 01, 2008

The bombardier beetle is inspiring designers of engines, drug-delivery devices and fire extinguishers to improve spray technologies, writes Andy McIntosh, from Leeds University, and Novid Beheshti, of Swedish Biomimetics 3000 Ltd, in April’s Physics World.

The bombardier beetle, found mainly in Africa and Asia, is remarkable in that it can fire a powerful jet of hot, toxic fluid to fight off predators such as birds and frogs. While the chemical reaction that makes the venom has been understood for some time, the actual power behind the venomous squirt, which can travel as far as 20cm, has been cause for speculation.

Quantities of hydroquinone and hydrogen peroxide gases build up in the beetle’s abdomen but, when necessary for defence, get mixed together in a connected ‘combustion chamber’ to produce toxic benzoquinone. This hot fluid is then fired off at force in the face of enemy predators.

The key to the beetle’s powerful defensive trick is in its combustion chamber’s inlet (or entry) and exit valves. The inlet valve opens to receive the chemicals, which begin to boil as soon as they meet, and closes when a sufficient amount of gas has been received.

As the gases react together, they generate heat and increase the pressure in the closed chamber. When the pressure reaches a critical point, the end of the exit valve is forced open and the hot fluid is ejected as a powerful burst of toxic steam in a process known as "flash evaporation".

Once the gas is released, the exit valve closes, the inlet valve opens and the chamber fills again, preparing for the next venomous ejection.

The research team at the School of Process, Environmental and Materials Engineering at LeedsUniversity has now managed to replicate how the bombardier beetle fires hot venom. In a series of experiments using just water (rather than venomous liquids), McIntosh and his team have been able to fire pulses of hot spray distances of up to 4 m and have been able to control the size of the droplets in the spray. The technique has now been licensed by Biomimetics 3000 Ltd for industrial applications.

This new technology is likely to be of interest to firms making drug-delivery systems as it could prove far more reliable than the mechanically-driven spring technology used in, for example, inhalers. It could also provide a much more energy-resourceful mechanism for fuel-injection in car engines and even lead to a new generation of fire extinguishers that can both produce either a fine mist or large droplets depending on what type of fire needs to be put out.

Source: Institute of Physics

Explore further: Spin-based electronics: New material successfully tested

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet installed at Fermilab

5 hours ago

One year ago, the 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet arrived at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois after traveling 3,200 miles over land and sea from Long Island, ...

Spin-based electronics: New material successfully tested

Jul 30, 2014

Spintronics is an emerging field of electronics, where devices work by manipulating the spin of electrons rather than the current generated by their motion. This field can offer significant advantages to computer technology. ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mabarker
1 / 5 (3) Apr 02, 2008
Someone out there please provide for me a darwinian explation of how this coleoptera got these unique designed defense features through time, chance and genetic mistakes?
Let's keep in mind it clearly wasn't natural selection, %u201CNatural selection can act only on those biological properties that already exist; it cannot create properties in order to meet adaptational needs.%u201D - Noble, Noble, Schad, MacInnes, Parasitology: The Biology of Animal Parasites, Lea & Febiger, 1989, p. 516.
ofidiofile
5 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2008
your wish is my command, MaTroll -- er, MaBarker. here's your explanation: http://www.talkor...er.html. fyi, you should really update your sources. this is an old one. (oh, right! creationism doesn't actually rely on testable hypotheses. sorry!)
mabarker
1 / 5 (1) Jul 10, 2008
surprise, suprise - I clicked on the snoreorigins.com and got the old 'internal server error' flag. I'm not surprised.
Show me empirical evidence that supports darwin's strange philosophy (aka macroevolution).
Oh, right - macroevolution doesn't actually rely on testable hypotheses. Sorry!
thales
not rated yet Jul 10, 2008
Surprise indeed. After searching for hours (not really, I just googled it), here is the correct link: http://www.talkor...ier.html

Also, you assert that macroevolution is not testable. For this I refer you to http://www.talkor...lsifying

Finally, the terms macroevolution and microevolution were first coined in 1927 by the Russian entomologist Iuri'i Filipchenko - not Darwin.
thales
not rated yet Jul 10, 2008
Hm, here's the macroevolution link again. Physorg doesn't play well with links, I'm afraid. http://www.talkor...lsifying
Ethelred
not rated yet Jul 15, 2009
mabarker comes here every few months to search for articles on evolution so Ma can post quotes from books that Ma has not read.

Mosty Ma posts in articles that have gone uncommented for months. That way there is no opposition.

Ethelred