First evidence that blocking key energy protein kills cancer cells

Mar 31, 2008
AT Synthase
In a finding that could lead to more effective anti-cancer medication, scientists exposed breast cancer cells to a substance that blocks a protein called ATP synthase. The cancer cells were killed while normal ones were preserved. Courtesy of Hsin-Yi Chang and Hsueh-Fen Juan

Researchers in Taiwan report for the first time that blocking a key energy-supplying protein kills cancer cells. The finding, described as the first to test possible medical uses of so-called ATP-synthase inhibitors, may lead to new and more effective anti-cancer medications, according to their report, which is scheduled for the April 4 issue of ACS’ monthly Journal of Proteome Research.

In the new study, Hsueh-Fen Juan and colleagues focused on ATP synthase, a key protein involved in producing the energy-rich molecules of ATP that power all life processes.

For years researchers thought that the protein existed only in mitochondria, structures located inside cells that convert nutrients into energy. Recent studies found high levels of ATP synthase on the surface of cancer cells, but until now the medical implications went unexplored.

The researchers analyzed tissue samples from breast cancer patients and found for the first time that the surface of breast cancer cells contains high levels of ATP synthase. In cell studies, exposing breast cancer cells to a substance that blocks ATP synthase killed the cancer cells but did not harm normal cells, the researchers say. The findings suggest that ATP synthase inhibitors may represent a new approach for fighting breast cancer and other cancer types, they say.

Source: ACS

Explore further: Observation is safe, cost-saving in low-risk prostate cancer

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

A robot that runs like a cat (w/ Video)

1 hour ago

Thanks to its legs, whose design faithfully reproduces feline morphology, EPFL's 4-legged 'cheetah-cub robot' has the same advantages as its model: It is small, light and fast.

Beyond NYC: Other places adapting to climate, too

8 hours ago

From Bangkok to Miami, cities and coastal areas across the globe are already building or planning defenses to protect millions of people and key infrastructure from more powerful storm surges and other effects ...

China paper hits out at US surveillance programme

8 hours ago

China's official army newspaper on Sunday branded the United States Internet surveillance programme exposed by former spy Edward Snowden as "frightening", and accused the US of being a "habitual offender" ...

German spy service plans 'more online surveillance'

9 hours ago

Germany's foreign intelligence service plans a major expansion of Internet surveillance despite deep unease over revelations of US online spying, Der Spiegel news weekly reported on Sunday.

Recommended for you

Study suggests new approach to fight lung cancer

9 hours ago

Recent research has shown that cancer cells have a much different – and more complex – metabolism than normal cells. Now, scientists at The University of Texas at Dallas have found that exploiting these differences might ...

Study evaluates procedures for diagnosing sarcoidosis

10 hours ago

Among patients with suspected stage I/II pulmonary sarcoidosis who were undergoing confirmation of the condition via tissue sampling, the use of the procedure known as endosonographic nodal aspiration compared with bronchoscopic ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

E_L_Earnhardt
1 / 5 (1) Mar 31, 2008
REDUCE ENERGY - SLOW MITOSIS - "COOLING" WOULD DO THE SAME DARN THING! WAKE UP THE DOCTOR!
superhuman
not rated yet Apr 01, 2008
@ E. L. Earnhardt:
No cooling wont do the same thing, we are warm-blooded animals, we maintain thermal homeostasis. Slowing the mitosis wouldn't help much either, it might slow cancer growth but it wont kill cancer cells. Besides there are no good ways of slowing the mitosis in normal cells (besides calorie restriction) and even if there were cancers cells have the mitosis control short -circuited anyway. You can only block mitosis with certain poisons and thats exactly what some chemotherapeutics do, but those are extremely toxic to both cancer and normal cells (to cancer cells a tiny bit more thats why they are used).

What makes you think that you know more about cancer then legions of scientists and physicians?
Especially since your comments seem to prove otherwise. Stop posting in caps and realize that every physician and scientist in the world would love to come up with a cure (as it means saving millions of people plus fame and money).
If you think that you've found a simple solution (like 'slowing mitosis') missed by everyone else it's an obvious indication that your understanding of the problem is flawed.

More news stories

Aspirin may fight cancer by slowing DNA damage

Aspirin is known to lower risk for some cancers, and a new study led by a UC San Francisco scientist points to a possible explanation, with the discovery that aspirin slows the accumulation of DNA mutations in abnormal cells ...

3D printing tiny batteries

(Phys.org) —3D printing can now be used to print lithium-ion microbatteries the size of a grain of sand. The printed microbatteries could supply electricity to tiny devices in fields from medicine to communications, ...