Asteroid heads for Earth, Russian astronomer claims

Oct 02, 2007

An asteroid discovered three years ago could be a threat in 2029 when it crosses Earth's orbit, a Russian astronomer said Monday.

Boris Shustov, director of the Institute of Astronomy, said at a forum that the Apophis asteroid could have a bigger impact than an asteroid that hit Siberia in 1908, the Novosti news agency reported.

The Tunguska astral event affected 830 square miles and blasted 80 million trees. The force of the impact was about 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bomb the United States dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, at the end of World War II and measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.

Apophis' predicted track would take it within 17,000 miles of Earth in 2029, Shustov said.

He said if the asteroid proves to be a threat, the Hollywood scenario of destroying it is likely to be more harmful than helpful. Instead, a micro-satellite could nudge it into a safer orbit.

"To blast an asteroid, as some hot shots suggest, is quite an unpredictable step, and a more cautious approach is welcomed now," he said.

Copyright 2007 by United Press International

Explore further: 'Flying saucer': NASA live-streamed Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator test

Related Stories

Unusual asteroid suspected of spinning to explosion

Mar 20, 2015

A team led by astronomers from the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland, recently used the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii to observe and measure a rare class of "active asteroids" that spontaneously ...

What was the impact that killed the dinosaurs?

Feb 04, 2015

What suddenly made the dinosaurs disappear 65 million or 66 million years ago? Whatever it was, all indications show that it was a massive extinction event. The fossil record not only shows dinosaurs disappearing, ...

Ten interesting facts about asteroids

Feb 03, 2015

At first glance, looking at a bunch of space rocks doesn't sound that exciting. Like, aren't they just a bunch of rubble? What use can they be in understanding the Solar System compared to looking at planets ...

Recommended for you

ESA's planetary defence test set for 2020

15 hours ago

If an asteroid were spotted headed towards Earth, what could humanity do about it? ESA's latest mission is part of a larger international effort to find out.

Brief moon eclipse coming April 4

21 hours ago

A brief total eclipse of the Moon may be visible on April 4 to skywatchers in western North America, Australia and East Asia, astronomers say.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

holoman
Oct 02, 2007
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
gopher65
3.5 / 5 (2) Oct 02, 2007
It doesn't matter whether you use a g-tug, use a DEW, spray paint the astroid on one side, or throw a net around it, tie it to a rocket, and try and drag it (heh). Just don't blow the dang thing up.

Talk about going from bad to worse. Then instead of having one or 2 big pieces hitting Earth, you have a million littler pieces, all of which can still do serious damage. The total kinetic energy of the strike is still the same either way.
nhdw
5 / 5 (1) Oct 03, 2007
Total kinetic energy may be the same, but the idea of blowing it up is so that the smaller pieces can disintegrate in the upper atmosphere.
mrlewish
4 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2007
What would you rather have poured on you? 1000lbs of pennies from 20 feet or a 1000lbs copper slug?
drknowledge
4 / 5 (1) Oct 11, 2007
Probability. We jaywalk to save a few seconds crossing the street at an unfamiliar intersection. We're phobic about violent crimes which would happen to us less often than winning the state lottery.

Human civilization has been around for thousands of years. So the reason for suddenly looking for objects from space is....? Good news stories? Funding for obscure engineers and scientists looking for a meal ticket?
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Oct 11, 2007
What would you rather have poured on you? 1000lbs of pennies from 20 feet or a 1000lbs copper slug?
--//--

I don't know how big they think the Apophos Asteroid is, but disintegration IS better than a slug. The asteroid in the Armageddon movie was like 500 kilometer diameter, which was very unrealistic even for a nuke to split that size object.

However, a "normal" object of a kilometer or two diameter could be blown apart by a well placed nuke, redirecting most of the material just enough to cause it to miss, and spreading out any residual impacts over a larger area and time.

It is better for many car or building size objects to enter the atmosphere a few at a time over several hours or days, than it is for an object the size of a small mountain to hit all at once. Smaller objects have a greater surface area per unit mass, which makes them burn up in atmostphere easier than a large one.

So the benefit of disintegration is manifold:

1) spread damage out over space and time.

2) burn up more of the object in the atmosphere, reducing the total mass, and therefore force, which reachers earth's surface.

3) Some of the material may miss the earth entirely.


I'll take the pennies because they are more likely to be slowed by air resistance and spread out, and also much of the energy will miss me, whereas a copper slug will hit all at once and smash me to oblivion.
derricka
not rated yet Oct 13, 2007
Why not just divert the asteroid just enough so that it hits the moon instead of the earth. No Asteroid that might return one day, no "shot gun" fragments, and no massive resource requirements, as the deflection would be minor, especially if done early. This would also present a great scientific opportunity to study the explosion and resulting lunar crater formation?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.