Thriving B.C. forests outpace pine-beetle CO2 losses by 2020

In a rare bit of good climate change news, scientists have found that trees are growing faster in British Columbia due to global warming, and this is starting to counter the carbon-loss impacts of the province's devastating mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreak.

The finding was made by a group of scientists working together on the Forestry Carbon Management Project—an initiative of the University of Victoria-led Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS).

Normally, forests function as what climate scientists call " sinks," which means that as trees grow, they "breathe" in carbon dioxide (CO2) and store carbon in their leaves, stems, branches and roots. But the MPB epidemic that started in the late 1990s and continued through the 2000s reversed this situation, causing much more carbon to be released back into the atmosphere as the dead trees rotted. With more than 18 million hectares of forests affected, the scale of rot was so bad that it turned BC's forests from a carbon sink into a "carbon source"—a net producer of greenhouse gases just like a car, a coal-fired power plant, or a cement factory. 

However, tree mortality has declined and these forests are now recovering from the outbreak.

"By 2020, the enhanced growth due to climate change and increasing CO2 more than compensates for the carbon loss from dead rotting trees," says lead researcher Vivek Arora of the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, a division of Environment and Climate Change Canada located at UVic. "This turn-around will happen much sooner than we had imagined."

Climate change is accelerating this recovery. It is projected to make BC warmer, but also parts of it wetter due to increased precipitation. Meanwhile, the greenhouse gas CO2 produces a "fertilization effect" that increases photosynthesis. Taken together, these warmer, wetter, more CO2–rich conditions allow high-latitude forests to recover faster from harvest, fire and insect disturbances than they otherwise would. This boost in growth in turn allows for greater storing of carbon in vegetation, forest floor litter and soil.

Global warming can, however, also make some regions drier making their forests more vulnerable to fires and drought-induced mortality. But using a combination of computer models and historic observations, the PICS research team has found that by the end of the decade, this enhanced forest growth substantially outpaces the reduced carbon uptake by forests that has been caused by the pine beetle outbreak, even after taking into account the increased fires.

"Ironically, while climate change can make insect outbreaks more likely, it can also help our forests recover more quickly from those outbreaks," says Werner Kurz, senior research scientist at Natural Resources Canada and head of PICS' five-year Forest Carbon Management Project, which investigates how forests can contribute to slowing as well as adapt to .

The scientists' findings have been published in Geophysical Research Letters, a peer-reviewed scientific journal of the American Geophysical Union. Like other modelling studies, the results are subject to caveats associated with model and data limitations. PICS is a collaboration of BC's four-research intensive universities. 

More information: Vivek K. Arora et al. Potential near-future carbon uptake overcomes losses from a large insect outbreak in British Columbia, Canada, Geophysical Research Letters (2016). DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067532

Journal information: Geophysical Research Letters

Citation: Thriving B.C. forests outpace pine-beetle CO2 losses by 2020 (2016, April 12) retrieved 19 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2016-04-bc-forests-outpace-pine-beetle-co2.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Studies show impact of forest management and deforestation on climate

9 shares

Feedback to editors