Solar incentives sunset as states grapple with tight budgets

March 23, 2016 by Susan Montoya Bryan

Thousands of homeowners and small businesses in New Mexico—the second sunniest state in the nation—have invested nearly a quarter billion dollars in roof-top solar and related labor thanks to a program fueled by tax credits.

Supporters say the investment has paid off. A record number of solar panels went up in 2015 and job growth within the industry jumped by more than 18 percent, signaling new economic opportunities for the struggling state.

But the plug will be pulled this year since lawmakers concerned about a state budget crisis did not approve a measure that would have extended the popular incentive through 2024. With the 10-percent now expiring at the end of the year, New Mexico joins other states where credits and other incentives have started to disappear.

While states have adopted hundreds of different policies and incentives related to various sources of renewable energy and energy efficiency, 16 states had specific programs that offered personal tax credits for solar.

Half of those states already have had their credits expire, including North Carolina, which once boasted the nation's most generous tax credit for solar installation. Others are in line to see them sunset over the next two years. Some states also have let expire corporate tax credits for solar.

"It's definitely a trend that we're seeing nationwide," said Autumn Proudlove, a senior policy analyst at North Carolina State University's Clean Energy Technology Center, which tracks state incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency.

According to a report released last month by the Clean Energy Technology Center, state policies and regulations that substantially affect the financial viability of roof-top business and residential solar are experiencing considerable uncertainty and volatility despite the industry's growth, falling prices and the federal government's extension of its 30 percent tax break.

Utilities have fought back over the years by lobbying lawmakers and state regulators to change metering policies and reduce incentives, arguing that the solar industry can stand on its own.

But in New Mexico, supporters blame the expiration of the solar tax credit on a budget crisis that saw new revenues dwindle to just a fraction of what lawmakers thought they were going to have available this next fiscal year.

Budget analysts warned just this week that New Mexico is withdrawing more money from reserves this year than it has in at least two decades.

The fear that New Mexico would not be able to afford the $3 million solar credit is unfounded, said Republican Rep. Sarah Maestas Barnes and Democrat Sen. Mimi Stewart, co-sponsors of legislation that called for extending the credit.

They argued that the solar industry has proven the value of the return on the state's investment since 2008. New Mexico now has some 1,900 solar jobs and more than $191 million has been invested in residential solar panel systems.

State energy officials also estimate nearly $36 million has been spent on related labor costs.

"We've seen steady growth over the past few years and the failure to implement this tax credit could have a severe impact on that," Maestas Barnes said.

"In a way, we're shooting ourselves in the foot by not extending this," Stewart said.

But Republican Rep. Jim Townsend of Artesia argued that the credit only helps individual homeowners who can afford to invest in solar and ultimately leads to higher prices for electric customers.

Regina Wheeler, CEO of Positive Energy Solar, one of New Mexico's largest installers, said she expects a rush on the remaining credits this year.

The state already has received nearly 400 applications and anticipates reaching the cap by the summer.

By not extending the tax credit, New Mexico will be reducing the amount of private investment in solar and potentially curbing one of the few industries that had added jobs over the last few years, Wheeler said.

"You want to put a damper on an industry that's doing well? I wouldn't think that would be a great policy, but that's what we're doing," she said. "We're going in the wrong direction."

Townsend said the tax credit has been a windfall for the industry.

"It's a subsidy that should not continue and is not required for the industry to grow," he said. "If that industry is strong and viable and is meeting the needs of those that consume it, then it will continue to survive."

Explore further: Tax credit extensions can impact renewable energy deployment and electric sector

Related Stories

Q2 2015 an impressive quarter for the US solar PV market

September 10, 2015

The business of photonics site, optics.org, reported on Wednesday that Solar PV (photovoltaic) was responsible for 40 percent of new US electricity generating capacity brought online in the first half of this year. As important, ...

America's place in the sun: Energy report sets goal

December 24, 2014

A recent energy report said that America should build on the recent growth in solar energy by setting a goal of obtaining at least 10 percent of its electricity from solar power by 2030. "Star Power: The Growing Role of Solar ...

Recommended for you

Swiss unveil stratospheric solar plane

December 7, 2016

Just months after two Swiss pilots completed a historic round-the-world trip in a Sun-powered plane, another Swiss adventurer on Wednesday unveiled a solar plane aimed at reaching the stratosphere.

Solar panels repay their energy 'debt': study

December 6, 2016

The climate-friendly electricity generated by solar panels in the past 40 years has all but cancelled out the polluting energy used to produce them, a study said Tuesday.

Wall-jumping robot is most vertically agile ever built

December 6, 2016

Roboticists at UC Berkeley have designed a small robot that can leap into the air and then spring off a wall, or perform multiple vertical jumps in a row, resulting in the highest robotic vertical jumping agility ever recorded. ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shakescene21
5 / 5 (2) Mar 23, 2016
It's time to replace the patchwork of State-level solar subsidies with generous Federal subsidies. By cutting out one or two aircraft carriers (and simultaneously reducing our global commitments) we can subsidize tens of billions in new solar and energy conservation.
Eikka
3 / 5 (4) Mar 24, 2016
we can subsidize tens of billions in new solar and energy conservation.


The industry has already been kickstarted. Now it's time for them to turn self-sustaining.

The money spent has to turn into real profit. There's absolutely no point in endlessly feeding an industry that won't make ends meet without subsidies.

It's a very simple equation: the market values energy at X dollars on average, and it costs Y dollars to make energy with solar power on average. If X is smaller than Y, it means the whole enterprise is net-negative because the market has to spend more energy to generate the amount of money it costs to pay for the solar power.

It doesn't matter what solar power would cost in theory - what matters is what we actually pay for it to the businesses that build it, because turning up with the money involves consuming energy and resources in the society at large. It's simply trading one form of energy or resource into another at a loss.

gkam
2.7 / 5 (7) Mar 24, 2016
Not so fast, Eikka.

Nukes have gotten huge subsidies for over 60 years. Dirty oil and gas, even longer.

It's our turn now.
Lord_jag
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 24, 2016
It's too bad the solar can't get subsidies the same way oil, coal and nukes got:

Okay we'll pay for your plant, infrastructure, network and land. You just have to pay to keep it running with the high price of energy we'll generously give you.

Sure. I'll run a solar array that was bought for me by the government and I'll even keep it running while pocketing all the profits from the energy sales. Of course, just like oil, gas and nukes, if it ever needs a minor repair I'll be back at the government trough looking for a handout.

Too bad this only puts money in the hands of the people instead of the few key ruling class people.
gkam
1 / 5 (4) Mar 24, 2016
" There's absolutely no point in endlessly feeding an industry that won't make ends meet without subsidies."
--------------------------------------------

Look up Hinckley C and Vogtle 3 & 4.
WillieWard
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 24, 2016
solar/wind does not need subsidies: 2¢/kwh, quite profitable according to gskam and his gang.
Lord_jag
5 / 5 (1) Mar 25, 2016
I'll be quite happy with that. 2 cents. What a great day that will be.

And I'll do ALL THE LABOR required by the solar panels and just pocket all the profits.

What a deal! If it works for oil, coal and gas, why not solar?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.