Without soil data, crop insurance pricing is a bust

March 16, 2016 by Matt Hayes

Farmers depend on insurance to cope with the enormous risk and cost it takes to coax crops from the ground. Unpredictable weather and rampaging pests all figure into the insurance rates farmers pay for economic protection, but there's one crucial aspect that insurance doesn't account for: the quality of the soil farmers depend on for almost everything they do.

First authorized by Congress in the 1930s to protect farmers ravaged by the Dust Bowl and Great Depression, Federal Crop Insurance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is today the cornerstone program to combat agricultural risk, says Joshua Woodard, assistant professor in the Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management in Cornell's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and founder of Ag-Analytics.Org.

But, Woodard says, by not integrating data into the calculations that determine premium costs, the federal agency's rates are rife with errors that lead to inefficiencies.

Farm-level insurance analyses conducted by Woodard determined that soil type has a significant impact on crop yield risk not reflected in the ratings the USDA uses to determine premiums. By not capturing soil quality, the government's actuarial models are imprecise and inefficient, he argues in a series of papers facilitated under the AGree Initiative.

"We developed the needed models to integrate this information and found that the pricing differentials caused by the government's failure to handle soil information leads to large errors," he says. "This is quite a glaring gap for the U.S. government agency charged with administering an otherwise very useful and critical policy. The soil data we used could easily and feasibly be scaled nationally."

Priced, regulated and administered by the USDA, the program is of utmost importance to domestic agricultural policy, Woodard says. But he argues the USDA's lumbering rating system has not kept pace with technological innovations.

The effective deployment of big data could make more efficient if the government used extant soil information in pricing, Woodard argues. Since 2009, the USDA's Risk Management Agency has collected field boundaries associated with each policy. By matching that insurance information with precise soil data, he says actuaries could develop precise soil-specific rates associated with the land under each policy. The agency has demurred in sharing that information with researchers partly out of privacy concerns, he says. But researchers cannot put forward operational program modification proposals without having access to those data.

"The big data revolution has led to an increased interest in exploring opportunities to employ high-resolution data in large-scale policy applications to improve sustainability of the agricultural system, which previously were impractical or impossible," he says.

The ability to condition rates on soil information potentially would lead to greater program efficiencies, predictable underwriting returns, taxpayer savings and better environmental outcomes, according to Woodard.

"Federal Crop Insurance as a policy has made many inroads into helping farmers manage risk, and it is well-accepted that such markets would likely not exist in the absence of government support due to systemic risk; however, the government arguably should not be in charge of actually setting premiums for the program," he says.

Explore further: Amid drought, US opens up land for grazing, haying

Related Stories

Amid drought, US opens up land for grazing, haying

July 23, 2012

The Obama administration opened up protected US land to help farmers and ranchers hit by severe drought Monday, and encouraged crop insurance companies to forgo charging interest for a month.

Covering the bases with cover crops

September 30, 2015

Most of us think that farmers grow and harvest crops for food. That's true for many crops: they either feed humans or farm animals. However, there's another category of crop that has a vital function in agricultural systems.

New models better predict field working days

January 29, 2016

Farmers and crop insurers depend on seasonal predictions of weather and soil workability to select appropriate cultivars, make decisions about planting and harvest dates, forecast yield, and determine risk. However, climate ...

Ecologist's warning on Earth's imperiled soils

February 1, 2016

Neglect of the soil beneath our feet could have far-reaching consequences for future generations in the UK and the rest of the world, an ecologist from The University of Manchester has warned.

Recommended for you

Thunderstorms spread mercury pollution

August 31, 2016

In the southern United States, an afternoon thunderstorm is part of a regular summer day. But new research shows those storms might be doing more than bringing some scary thunder and lightning.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.