The real value of taking your business offshore

February 17, 2016

Over the last two decades, an increasing number of companies have set up subsidiaries in offshore financial centres. So why don't they move the entire business, and establish headquarters there too?

While it seems prestigious—and tax-savvy—to be based in the Cayman Islands or Luxembourg, companies that choose to do so aren't actually worth more, according to a new study published in the Journal of Corporate Finance. It's the companies whose subsidiaries are offshore that are reaping the financial benefits. However, there are hidden costs associated with this too.

"Offshore financial centres, or OFCs, are attractive to companies because of low taxation, flexible regulations and stringent secrecy policies," says Concordia University accountancy professor Michel Magnan, who conducted the study with co-authors Tiemei Li from the University of Ottawa and Art Durnev from the University of Iowa.

"Market icons like Google, Apple and the General Electric Company have already established offshore subsidiaries to take advantage of those benefits. For example, Google's offshore operations helped the reduce its overseas tax rate to 2.4 per cent in 2009, the lowest tax rate compared to the top five US technology companies," says Magnan.

To examine whether migrating offshore or establishing an offshore subsidiary benefits shareholders, the researchers examined thousands of firms with registered headquarters in 19 OFCs, as well as firms from 30 non-OFC countries with subsidiaries offshore.

They found that the value of firms whose headquarters are registered offshore is significantly less than that of onshore firms. On the other hand, firms whose offshore presence is limited to subsidiaries are worth more than strictly onshore firms.

The study shows that, specifically, firms with subsidiaries in OFCs are worth 11 per cent more than purely onshore companies, while firms with headquarters in OFCs are valued 14 per cent lower than their onshore counterparts.

Why is that?

Magnan explains that, although companies with offshore headquarters have much lower corporate tax rates—which average 11.5 per cent, as compared to an average of 36.5 per cent for firms with offshore subsidiaries—"it appears that these tax savings are offset by the costs associated with conflicts of interest between shareholders and management that arise because of offshore disconnect."

In spite of the increase in worth for firms with subsidiaries in OFC's, there are hidden costs that may also off-set that. Magnan hopes government policymakers will pay attention.

"Lax monitoring by tax authorities, loose legal regimes and flexible regulation enforcement of OFCs increase the risk of insider expropriation and decrease investor protection. The confidential policies of offshore financial centres and offshore firms' complex legal structures also create more opacity for investors," he says.

"That lack of transparency negatively affects a firm's worth and, to a large extent offsets benefits, especially for registered offshore. We argue that a company that claims it's legally based in one country can sometimes provide a misleading impression—what looks like a US or Canadian company can be reaping rewards elsewhere without investors' knowledge."

Explore further: Senate probe: Microsoft, HP avoid offshore taxes (Update)

More information: Art Durnev et al. Are Offshore Firms Worth More?, SSRN Electronic Journal (2015). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2167441

Related Stories

Senate probe: Microsoft, HP avoid offshore taxes (Update)

September 20, 2012

(AP)—Microsoft Corp., the Hewlett-Packard Co. and other multinational corporations have avoided billions in U.S. taxes by shifting profits offshore and taking advantage of weak, ambiguous sections of the tax code, Senate ...

Apple, US lawmakers in offshore tax showdown

May 17, 2013

Apple and US lawmakers are gearing up for a showdown over taxes—specifically how to deal with the huge stockpile of cash held by Apple and other multinational firms offshore.

Tech giants defend tax policies at Australian hearing

April 8, 2015

Global technology giants Apple, Google and Microsoft on Wednesday defended their corporate tax structures at an Australian parliamentary hearing, rebuffing claims they were shifting their profits offshore to avoid paying ...

Global pharma firms grilled about tax in Australia

July 1, 2015

The world's top pharmaceutical companies Wednesday told an Australian parliamentary hearing they were compliant with local and international laws, despite claims they are charging higher prices to minimise tax.

US Treasury ramps up war on tax-evading mergers

November 19, 2015

The US Treasury announced new measures Thursday to block "inversion" mergers designed to let companies avoid US taxes, placing a possible obstacle to Pfizer's potential $150 billion mega takeover of Ireland-based Allergan.

High corporate taxes incentivize corporate debt

January 27, 2016

Multinational American companies with significant operations in countries with low corporate taxes take on less debt than companies that face higher taxes, according to a new study from the University of Maryland's Robert ...

Recommended for you

An inflexible diet led to the disappearance of the cave bear

August 23, 2016

Senckenberg scientists have studied the feeding habits of the extinct cave bear. Based on the isotope composition in the collagen of the bears' bones, they were able to show that the large mammals subsisted on a purely vegan ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.