Study suggests ocean was cooler than others have suggested during time life began on Earth

February 29, 2016 by Bob Yirka report
Study suggests ocean was cooler than others have suggested during time life began on Earth
Map of South Africa. The Barberton greenstone belt shown in red. Credit: Wikipedia

A pair of researchers, one with Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University in South Africa and the other with the University of Bergen in Norway, has conducted a study of rocks in South Africa, and has concluded that the ocean was not as cold as other studies have shown during the time period when life is believed to have first appeared on Earth. In their paper published in the journal Sciences Advances, Maarten de Wit and Harald Furnes describe their research results and why they now believe that our planet may have existed in the Goldilocks Zone for the entire time that life has existed on our planet.

Prior studies have been done on some particular rocks found in South Africa, important because they have been dated back approximately 3.5 billion years—back to approximately the same time period that scientists believe life first got its start on planet Earth. Those earlier studies have shown that the rocks actually resided at the bottom of the ocean during that time period, and that the ocean was approximately 55 to 85 degrees Celsius. In this new study, the research pair suggest that estimate was in error because it did not take into account the possibility that the rocks were near , where the water is always warmer than the rest of the ocean.

To get a better idea of the true early water temperature, the researchers studied other nearby rocks of the same age that had been formed from ocean sediments, which meant they could not have resided near a vent. Those rocks, the team reports, contained gypsum, which in modern times grows only in cold deep sea water. Also, they noted that tiny grains of iron present in the rock at the time of its formation revealed that it had come about at low latitudes, very near the equator. Taken together, the evidence suggests, the researchers claim, that it was likely both the oceans and atmosphere were similar to conditions today, and that suggests that our planet may have resided in the Goldilocks zone (not too hot or too cold to support life) for the entire duration of the existence of life on Earth. They further suggest that their findings will lay to rest the common assumption that the only possibility of life coming to exist on Earth occurred during a time when the oceans were much warmer than today.

Explore further: Curiosity finds rocks that might point to a continental crust on Mars

More information: M. J. de Wit et al, 3.5-Ga hydrothermal fields and diamictites in the Barberton Greenstone Belt—Paleoarchean crust in cold environments, Science Advances (2016). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500368

Related Stories

Super-Earths have long-lasting oceans

January 5, 2015

For life as we know it to develop on other planets, those planets would need liquid water, or oceans. Geologic evidence suggests that Earth's oceans have existed for nearly the entire history of our world. But would that ...

Ocean toxicity hampered the rapid evolution of complex life

December 4, 2015

By examining rocks at the bottom of ancient oceans, an international group of researchers have revealed that arsenic concentrations in the oceans have varied greatly over time. But also that in the very early oceans, arsenic ...

Recommended for you

Scientists examine bacterium found 1,000 feet underground

December 8, 2016

Pioneering work being carried out in a cave in New Mexico by researchers at McMaster University and The University of Akron, Ohio, is changing the understanding of how antibiotic resistance may have emerged and how doctors ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

hemitite
5 / 5 (2) Feb 29, 2016
"...has concluded that the ocean was not as cold as other studies have shown during the time period when life is believed to have first appeared on Earth."

The headline is correct; the above quote from the article has it backwards.
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
5 / 5 (3) Feb 29, 2016
The work is a nice catch, but is very hard to recognize it from the article here, so I recommend reading the OA paper directly.

The paper starts off with the more recognizable description of ocean temperature estimates @ 3.5 Ga as 26 - 85 degC; I can right off remember the ~ 40 degC value from a work on cherts there they could rid of the hydrothermal signature, as well as a unique ~ 40 degC estimate from a 3.1 Ga water inclusion in a salt crystal.

The main observation is of putative glacial [!] conditions, likely locally at that.

[tbctd]
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
5 / 5 (3) Feb 29, 2016
[ctd]

And the paper never discuss emergence of life conditions, so either it is Yirka's speculation or sourced from an interview. (Citing sources would be nice!)

It is true that early estimates were a hot (> 70 degC) ocean. But while phylogenies of lineages and heat chock proteins point to early thermophily, it can often be seen as possibly tied to hydrothermal vents being either the emergence environment or a productive environment life bottlenecked through at the putative late bombardment. (Productive as in lots of abiotic hydrogen and hydrocarbon production as the biosphere expanded in volume and capability of alternate nutrient sources.)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.