# How many holes need to be drilled to collapse a wooden cube?

##### February 18, 2016 by Lisa Zyga feature

(Phys.org)—It may sound like a simple riddle, but a team of scientists is intrigued with the answer because it could lead to a better understanding of percolation, the process that occurs when a liquid trickles through small holes in a filter. Percolation models have applications in unexpected areas, such as understanding cancer metastasis and in distributed computing.

The scenario involves a wooden cube with 6-cm sides made of medium-density fiberboard. Each of the six faces is marked with a 6 x 6-cm square lattice for a total of 36 square cells per face. Then round holes (of diameter equal to the length of a square cell) are drilled through random cells all the way through the cube. Holes continue to be randomly drilled until the structure breaks apart into separate pieces.

Through both experiments and simulations, the researchers found that the number of holes that needs to be drilled to collapse this particular cube is always around 13 holes in each of the three directions, or 39 holes total. Their formula shows that, although this critical number changes for different lattice sizes, the critical density of drills is very similar. (Also, the type of wood doesn't matter, since whatever wood is not drilled is considered intact.) But for the scientists, what's more important than a particular number is how the cube reaches its breaking point.

The researchers, a seven-member collaboration representing institutions in Switzerland, the UK, Brazil, the US, China, Portugal, and Germany, have published a paper on the fragmentation properties due to random drilling in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

As the number of drilled holes approaches the critical number, the researchers found that the cube begins to exhibit critical fragmentation properties. Surprisingly, the properties observed here turn out to differ greatly from those observed by researchers 30 years ago using similar models, but before modern simulation technology.

"We find that the statistical properties of drilling are different from the ones of classical percolation—we say in physics of critical phenomena that these two systems fall into different universality classes," coauthor Nuno Araújo, at the University of Lisbon in Portugal, told Phys.org.

Whereas the classical model suggests that random hole-drilling follows random percolation behavior, in the new study the researchers found that the behavior departs from random behavior as the cube approaches its critical breaking point. They found that the cube gradually transitions to this critical point, accompanied by a rich spectrum of critical phenomena. For percolation applications, this finding means that a liquid's transport properties change in a predictable way as the filter it passes through approaches its .

The results could have diverse applications, including helping researchers better understand how enzymes degrade the gel that surrounds and supports organs and tissues. The structural gel, also called the "extracellular matrix," is often modeled as a cube and the enzyme activity is modeled as random cutting. Understanding enzyme gel degradation is vital for understanding many biochemical processes, including tumor metastasis, since the enzyme "drilling" allows tumor cells to move to other organs.

Percolation models are also used to understand networks, in particular to detect communities within networks. The models apply to many different types of networks, from social networks to distributed computing networks, in which multiple computers communicate with one another to solve problems.

In the future, the researchers plan to investigate how drilling might affect the material's physical properties.

"Percolation is all about connectivity," Araújo said. "In this work we mainly focus on the evolution of the largest connected piece. Other properties that are still unexplored for drilling are the conductivity properties—for example, electric conductivity if the material is a conductor."

Explore further: What does turbulence have in common with an epidemic?

More information: K. J. Schrenk, et al. "Critical Fragmentation Properties of Random Drilling: How Many Holes Need to Be Drilled to Collapse a Wooden Cube?" Physical Review Letters. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.055701
Also at arXiv:1601.03534 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

## Related Stories

#### What does turbulence have in common with an epidemic?

February 16, 2016

Fluid flows can take one of two forms: well-ordered "laminar" or highly disordered "turbulent" motion. Although everyday experience shows that laminar motion in simple shear flows as in pipes or channels gives way to turbulence ...

#### Record-seeking pair show off robot solving Rubik's Cube

January 26, 2016

After the first wave of satisfaction in solving a Rubik's Cube puzzle comes recognition that there are higher rungs to reach: not only solving it but solving it quickly. How quickly? That's the stuff of which world contests ...

#### Scientists review worldwide rise of 'network of networks'

December 3, 2014

The interdisciplinary field of network science has attracted enormous attention in the past 10 years, although most results have been obtained by analyzing isolated networks. However many real-world networks interact with ...

#### Researcher devises method to untangle, analyze 'controlled chaos'

July 13, 2015

A researcher at Indiana University has developed a new mathematical framework to more effectively analyze "controlled chaos," or how interactions among highly complex systems affect their operation and vulnerability.

#### Researchers discover way to allow 80 percent of sound to pass through walls

June 21, 2013

(Phys.org) —A team of researchers in Korea has discovered a way to allow sound to pass through walls almost as if they were not there at all. As the group describes in their paper published in the journal Physical Review ...

#### How to solve a Rubik's cube in five seconds

November 30, 2015

This week, 14-year-old Lucas Etter set a new world record for solving the classic Rubik's cube in Clarksville, Maryland, in the US, solving the scrambled cube in an astonishing 4.904 seconds.

## Recommended for you

#### Physicists make it possible to 3-D print your own baby universe

October 28, 2016

Researchers have created a 3D printed cosmic microwave background - a map of the oldest light in the universe - and provided the files for download.

#### Novel light sources made of 2-D materials

October 28, 2016

Physicists from the University of Würzburg have designed a light source that emits photon pairs, which are particularly well suited for tap-proof data encryption. The experiment's key ingredients: a semiconductor crystal ...

#### Changing semiconductor properties at room temperature

October 28, 2016

It's a small change that makes a big difference. Researchers have developed a method that uses a one-degree change in temperature to alter the color of light that a semiconductor emits. The method, which uses a thin-film ...

#### Raising temperature changes an element's electronic 'topology'

October 28, 2016

Materials scientists at Caltech have discovered a new way that heat tweaks the physical properties of a material.

#### Bubble nucleus discovered

October 27, 2016

Research conducted at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University has shed new light on the structure of the nucleus, that tiny congregation of protons and neutrons found at the core of ...

#### Shocks in the early universe could be detectable today

October 27, 2016

(Phys.org)—Physicists have discovered a surprising consequence of a widely supported model of the early universe: according to the model, tiny cosmological perturbations produced shocks in the radiation fluid just a fraction ...

##### MR166
not rated yet Feb 18, 2016
I do not see how you need 39 holes, 13 on the x,y and z planes to do the job. 36 holes drilled on just one face should reduce the cube to long thin strips of wood. Am I missing the point here?
##### MR166
not rated yet Feb 18, 2016
Perhaps the article is poorly worded. Should it ask what is the maximum number of holes that can be drilled in a cube before it collapses?
##### snoosebaum
3 / 5 (2) Feb 18, 2016
depends on the size of the hole ,no? ???? odd stuff
##### RealScience
5 / 5 (4) Feb 18, 2016
@MR166 - the goal is not to see how few holes one can fragment the cube with (a line of 6 holes across one face would do that), nor to see how many (a checkerboard of 18 holes could be drilled in each face, for 54 holes, and still not collapse it) .

The goal is to see how many holes can be drilled at RANDOM locations before it collapses.

The number 'e' (2.71828...) arises very often in problems involving randomness, and with 36 holes per face, 36/e is ~13.24, so 13 holes per face makes sense.
##### MR166
5 / 5 (3) Feb 18, 2016
Thanks RS
##### Andragogue
5 / 5 (1) Feb 18, 2016
One really big one with r = L
##### thingumbobesquire
1 / 5 (1) Feb 19, 2016
The doctrine of randomness is junk science: Beethoven and Riemann: Polemicists against Chaos Theory http://thingumbob...sts.html
##### Eikka
5 / 5 (1) Feb 19, 2016
The number 'e' (2.71828...) arises very often in problems involving randomness

That's probably because of scale invariance of the phenomenon when dealing with a random distribution. "e" is a curious number because it can be used in an exponential function that is its own derivate and integral, so you get the same function whether you're looking at the accumulation or the rate of it.

##### ogg_ogg
not rated yet Feb 21, 2016
The number e arises "very often" therefore "it makes sense" ? Last I heard, numerology has been thoroughly debunked, in case you hadn't heard. The number 1 arises even more often (as does the number 2, probably). What should we conclude from that? Ah, I know:E=mc²! First of all, "random" is at best a poorly defined term. Secondly any hole drilled in a corner cell will produce 2 pieces (at least). There are 4 corners on each face so the "random" chance of a hole in a corner starts at 4/36 then 4/35 then 4/34 then 4/33...(if its not selected). Or the P() of not hitting a corner is (32/36)(31/35)(30/34) and by the time you get to 13, P() is ~15% which is about 1-sigma for a normal distribution. That's assuming you keep the 3 faces separate, while in the real world, you'd probably either select a face "randomly" or do them in sequence. Also, it isn't a "riddle", no more than "What do I have in my pocket?" is. Bilbo cheated.