Don't be alarmed: AI won't leave half the world unemployed

February 18, 2016 by Toby Walsh, Data61, The Conversation
Intelligent machines are good at some jobs that were once done by humans. Credit: Shutterstock/SFC

Recent alarmist headlines this week claim artificial intelligence (AI) will put half of us out of work.

These headlines – and there were severalstem from comments by Rice University's computer scientist Moshe Vardi who at the asked what society would do when, within 30 years, machines become capable of doing almost any job a human can.

As ever, is likely to be far more nuanced than sensational headlines.

The most detailed study in this area came out in September 2013 from the Oxford Martin School. This report predicted that 47% of jobs in the US were under threat of automation. Similar studies have since been performed for other countries, reaching broadly similar conclusions.

Now, there's a lot I would disagree with in the Oxford report. But, for the sake of the discussion here, let's just suppose for a moment that the report is correct.

Even with this assumption, you cannot conclude that half of us will be unemployed in 30 or so years. The Oxford report merely estimated the number of jobs that are potentially automatable over the next few decades. There are many reasons why this will not translate into 47% unemployment.

We still want a human on the job

The report merely estimated the number of jobs that are susceptible to automation. Some of these jobs won't be automated in practice for economical, societal, technical and other reasons.

For example, we can pretty much automate the job of an airline pilot today. Indeed, most of the time, a computer is flying your plane. But society is likely to continue to demand the reassurance of having a pilot on board even if they are just reading their iPad most of the time.

As a second example, the Oxford report gives a 94% chance for bicycle repairer to be automated. But it is likely to be very expensive and difficult to automate this job, and therefore uneconomic to do so.

We also need to consider all the new jobs that technology will create. For example, we don't employ many printers setting type any more. But we do employ many more people in the digital equivalent, making web pages.

Of course, if you are a printer and your job is destroyed, it helps if you're suitably educated so you can re-position yourself in one of these new industries.

Some of these jobs will only be partially automated, and automation will in fact enhance a person's ability to do the job. For example, the Oxford report gives a 98% chance of umpiring or refereeing to be automated. But we are likely to have just as many if not more umpires and referees in the future, even if they use technologies to do their job better.

Automation can create employment

In fact, the US Department of Labor predicts that we will see a 5% increase in umpires and referees over the next decade.

The Oxford give a 63% chance for geoscientists to be automated. But automation is more likely to permit geoscientists to do more geoscience.

Indeed, the US Department of Labor actually predicts the next decade will see a 10% increase in the number of geoscientists as we seek to make more of the planet's diminishing resources.

We also need to consider how the working week will change over the next few decades. Most countries in the developed world have seen the number of hours worked per week decrease significantly since the start of the industrial revolution.

In the US, the average working week has declined from around 60 hours to just 33. Other developed countries are even lower. Germans only 26 hours per week. If these trends continue, we will need to create more to replace these lost hours.

In my view, it's hard to predict with any certainty how many of us will really be unemployed in a few decades time but I am very sceptical that it will be half of us. Society would break down well before we get to 50% unemployment.

My guess is it will be at most half of this prediction, 25% at most. This is nevertheless an immense change, and one that we need to start planning for and mitigating against today.

Explore further: Opinion: The threat of robots and automation taking jobs is being overstated

Related Stories

When machines can do any job, what will humans do?

February 13, 2016

Rice University computer scientist Moshe Vardi expects that within 30 years, machines will be capable of doing almost any job that a human can. In anticipation, he is asking his colleagues to consider the societal implications. ...

Robot revolution will change world of work

March 24, 2015

Robots will fundamentally change the shape of the workforce in the next decade but many industries will still need a human touch, a QUT Future of Work Conference has heard.

Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

February 14, 2016

Advances in artificial intelligence will soon lead to robots that are capable of nearly everything humans do, threatening tens of millions of jobs in the coming 30 years, experts warned Saturday.

Who does most of the housework in multicultural Britain?

February 9, 2016

The first ever nationally representative study has looked at how housework is organised by couples across different ethnic groups in Britain. It finds that Black Caribbean men have the least traditional attitudes to gender ...

Recommended for you

Microsoft aims at Apple with high-end PCs, 3D software

October 26, 2016

Microsoft launched a new consumer offensive Wednesday, unveiling a high-end computer that challenges the Apple iMac along with an updated Windows operating system that showcases three-dimensional content and "mixed reality."

Making it easier to collaborate on code

October 26, 2016

Git is an open-source system with a polarizing reputation among programmers. It's a powerful tool to help developers track changes to code, but many view it as prohibitively difficult to use.

Dutch unveil giant vacuum to clean outside air

October 25, 2016

Dutch inventors Tuesday unveiled what they called the world's first giant outside air vacuum cleaner—a large purifying system intended to filter out toxic tiny particles from the atmosphere surrounding the machine.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Feb 18, 2016
If these trends continue, we will need to create more jobs to replace these lost hours.

That's easier said than done, since the number of working hours are declining due to unemployment and people dropping on benefits. There are several welfare and tax traps that dis-incentivise having people on full time, and things like unreasonably tight laws and union rules on sacking people mean that companies simply hire temps through work agencies to be able to get rid of them.
1 / 5 (2) Feb 18, 2016
As the minimum wage is increased there is more and more incentive to automate. For instance, ordering fast food with a phone app will displace a lot of unskilled workers.
not rated yet Feb 18, 2016
We need an EXTENDABLE OPEN SOURCE AI extending what each person can do.
One NOT designed by accountants to drag you into their chosen cul-de-sac.
One that can be TAUGHT not take you to Bing search engine if you say "Ring Frank".
One that is MODULAR whether your target interest is medicine or 1970 rock music riffs.
One that definitely doesn't advertise, and is equally suited to either being confined to knowing your laptop media collection or extended to 11 dimensions looking for a credible new GUT on physics websites, depending on your mood and choice or home or workplace.
5 / 5 (1) Feb 18, 2016
This reads like a off-the-cuff blog entry without any serious thought. First, "employment" does not imply, in ANY way, a living wage. Neither does it imply full-time work nor whether worker is dramatically underemployed. Second, the author argues that reducing the work-week creates jobs. This is profoundly wrong: the reduced work-week is a RESULT of increased productivity, including automation replacing workers' labor since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The author says we have to "" to address this. We've been experiencing & adjusting to this for over a century, although AI will accelerate the process. Welfare programs are one result of this. If the report he is talking about didn't examine the cost of implementing a AI solution to a particular job, then it is practically useless- it fails on the most fundamental level to address what most jobs are in a free market economy.
not rated yet Feb 21, 2016
First, read Asimov's "Robots and Empire". Those three laws wont save you from what the robots will do to you. Second, realize that productivity will continue to increase as it has with automation in the past 100 years, and that not all typesetter type jobs will have web designer equivalencies. Third, better get sorted out how the least educated will take care of themselves (prostitution, domestic servitude, etc) until robots replace them too.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.