Central Appalachia flatter due to mountaintop mining

February 5, 2016
Years of blowing away mountain ridges in search of coal and depositing the excess rock in nearby valleys have dramatically flattened the landscape in parts of Central Appalachia. This animation shows an elevation map of West Virginia's Mud River watershed before and after mountaintop mining became widespread. Credit: Matthew Ross, Duke University.

Forty years of mountaintop coal mining have made parts of Central Appalachia 60 percent flatter than they were before excavation, says new research by Duke University.

The study, which compares pre- and post-mining topographic data in southern West Virginia, is the first to examine the regional impact of mountaintop mines on landscape topography and how the changes might influence water quality.

"There hasn't been a large-scale assessment of just the simple full topographic impact of , which occupies more than 10 percent of the land in the region we studied," said Matthew Ross, an ecology PhD student and lead author on the study.

"[We found] the impact is deep and extensive," Ross said. "It is locally large and more wide-ranging than other forms of mining." The study is published online in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

In mountaintop mining, bedrock is blasted away to uncover coal seams below the surface. Excess rock is deposited in nearby valleys, creating what are called valley fills.

By comparing digitized from West Virginia before mountaintop mining became extensive with elevation data collected by aircraft in 2010, the researchers found that the mines and valley fills could range anywhere from 10 to 200 meters deep. Across the region, the average slope of the land dropped by more than 10 degrees post-mining.

Years of blowing away mountain ridges in search of coal and depositing the excess rock in nearby valleys have dramatically flattened the landscape in parts of Central Appalachia. These maps show the elevation of West Virginia's Mud River watershed before and after mountaintop mining became widespread. Credit: Matthew Ross, Duke University.

As part of the study, Ross collaborated with Duke University's Data+ program to develop a web-based app that allows users to toggle between pre- and post-mining topographic maps in each watershed of the study. The app dramatically visualizes how the landscapes have been flattened by the transfer of rock from mountain peaks to mountain valleys.

"We tend to measure the impact of human activity based on the area it affects on a map, but mountaintop mining is penetrating much more deeply into the earth than other land use in the region like forestry, agriculture or urbanization," said Emily Bernhardt, a professor of biology at Duke and co-author on the study. "The depth of these impacts is changing the way the geology, water, and vegetation interact in fundamental ways that are likely to persist far longer than other forms of land use."

Of particular interest to the team is how the conversion from solid bedrock to porous valley fills changes the way water moves through the area, and whether this increases the likelihood that water will pick up alkaline mine pollutants.

The hillside slope of West Virginia's Headwaters Twentymile Creek watershed pre- and post-mining calculated from elevation maps. Credit: Matthew Ross, Duke University.

"You go from having shallow soil that is between half a meter and two meters deep, to something that is like a soil that is a hundred meters deep. The way the water moves through those two different landscapes is really different," Ross said. "There are valley fills that are the size of an Olympic swimming pool and then there are valley fills that are 10,000 Olympic swimming pools, so there is a huge range in the capacity they have to hold water."

Ross says the data from this study indicates a correlation between the total volume of displaced rock and the concentration of certain pollutants, like selenium, downstream.

"We have data that the impacts can last at least 30 years, but the geomorphology impacts might last thousands of years," said Ross. "Once you have these flat plateaus, it sets up a whole new erosion machine and a whole new way that the landscape will be shaped into the future."

Bernhardt said the findings should also inform planning in the region. "Even if we stopped mountaintop mining tomorrow, what kind of landscape is going to be left behind, and what are the constraints on what the landscape can be used for?"

Explore further: Large numbers of birth defects seen near mountaintop mining operations

More information: Matthew R. V. Ross et al. Deep Impact: Effects of Mountaintop Mining on Surface Topography, Bedrock Structure, and Downstream Waters, Environmental Science & Technology (2016). DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04532

To see the impact on other West Virginia watersheds, visit www.minedwatersheds.com/

Related Stories

New study documents cumulative impact of mountaintop mining

December 12, 2011

Increased salinity and concentrations of trace elements in one West Virginia watershed have been tied directly to multiple surface coal mines upstream by a detailed new survey of stream chemistry. The Duke University team ...

Mountaintop mining pollution has distinct chemical signatures

August 15, 2013

Three elements commonly found at elevated levels in an Appalachian river polluted by runoff from mountaintop coal mining have distinctive chemistries that can be traced back to their source, according to a Duke University-led ...

Recommended for you

Researchers unravel process for the formation of rainstorms

August 29, 2016

Violent thunderstorms can often cause torrential rain, which pose a threat for both humans and the infrastructure. Until now such extreme weather phenomena have been very poorly understood. However, using advanced simulations ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeffhans1
5 / 5 (1) Feb 05, 2016
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't newly exposed rock also behave differently when it comes to soaking up carbon dioxide for the first few years? Wouldn't this massive amount of artificially eroded material cause long term impact to the atmosphere as the surface area is now thousands of times what naturally occurs in the region.
Caliban
5 / 5 (2) Feb 06, 2016
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't newly exposed rock also behave differently when it comes to soaking up carbon dioxide for the first few years? Wouldn't this massive amount of artificially eroded material cause long term impact to the atmosphere as the surface area is now thousands of times what naturally occurs in the region.


To answer your question, Jeffhans 1,

Why , yes --yes it does. Generally, erosion of newly exposed mineral strata does effect the Carbon Balance, and in this case, will contribute mightily to Carbon emissions (in a positive feedback). Ultimately, this effect willl decline, but it won't really matter by then, anyway, right?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.