Science journal issues expression of concern over chemistry paper

January 22, 2016 by Bob Yirka report
This is a computer graphic of an RNA molecule. Credit: Richard Feldmann/Wikipedia

(Phys.org)—The journal Science has published an "editorial expression of concern" by its editor-in-chief, Marcia McNutt, regarding a research paper the journal published back in 2004. The paper titled "RNA-Mediated Metal-Metal Bond Formation in the Synthesis of Hexagonal Palladium Nanoparticles" by Bruce Eaton and Daniel Feldheim, chemists at North Carolina State University and grad student Lina Gugliotti was partially discredited after a colleague at the same university, Stefan Franzen, filed a complaint with the school challenging the work done by the research trio.

The paper outlined a way to use RNA to grow crystals of metal, which opened the door to the idea that RNA might be involved in processes in nature that resulted in the production of inorganic materials. After it was published in Science, Franzen alerted the university to discrepancies in the work, possibly due to intentional misconduct. After several months, the university conducted an investigation into the allegations made by Feldheim and eventually found that the researchers had failed to properly index their electron microscopy data, contradicting statements in their paper—more negligence than misconduct. Apparently not satisfied with that result, Feldheim contacted officers at the University of Colorado, after Eaton and Felhdeim moved there—the university's research-integrity official looked into the matter and concluded that the issue was more one of a disagreement between colleagues than an example of misconduct.

Several years later, after the paper had been cited over 135 times, the National Science Foundation got involved—the work by the team was looked at in more detail and the result was a report that suggested the trio had overstated their findings and omitted details. A recommendation of was made. The agency did not make such a judgment but did produce a letter reprimanding the researchers and banned them from receiving research funds from the NSF until they take "specific actions to correct publications containing the misleading results," to remedy the errors.

The expression of concern by McNutt is meant to alert other researchers to the possibility of errors in the paper, warning them that it might not be a good idea to use or cite the paper in their own research efforts, and to notify readers that the journal is working with the authors to gain a better understanding of what occurred. Once that happens, the journal intends to either print a retraction or a correction.

Explore further: Research integrity—what it means, why it is important and how we might protect it

More information: M. McNutt. Editorial expression of concern, Science (2016). DOI: 10.1126/science.351.6271.348-a

L. A. Gugliotti. RNA-Mediated Metal-Metal Bond Formation in the Synthesis of Hexagonal Palladium Nanoparticles, Science (2004). DOI: 10.1126/science.1095678

NSF Office of Inspector General, Closeout Memorandum: www.nsf.gov/oig/case-closeout/A06110054.pdf

Related Stories

Scientific misconduct is real, but rare

February 14, 2013

(Phys.org)—Richard Primack, Boston University professor of biology and editor-in-chief of the journal Biological Conservation, observes in the current issue of that publication that while instances of scientific misconduct ...

Feds: Ex-Harvard prof faked data in experiments

September 5, 2012

(AP)—Federal investigators have found that a Harvard University psychology professor who resigned after being accused of scientific misconduct fabricated data and manipulated results in experiments.

Ensuring research integrity

May 9, 2011

Canada needs an agency to investigate research misconduct, states an editorial in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Recommended for you

Diabetes missing link discovered

December 5, 2016

New Zealand researchers have uncovered a new mechanism that controls the release of the hormone insulin in the body, providing hope for those with a genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

indio007
2 / 5 (4) Jan 22, 2016
Wow. A story on scientific fraud illicit no comments.
Scroofinator
3 / 5 (4) Jan 22, 2016
Ya not enough wow factor since such conduct is not unexpected.
jonesdave
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 22, 2016
Wow. A story on scientific fraud illicit no comments.


I'll comment ;)
Imagine if the ramblings of EU were subject to such oversight!
baudrunner
1 / 5 (7) Jan 22, 2016
That's just one they caught. They're still permitting DM and M-theory papers, and they are all pure(?) conjecture. Apparently, naughty math is okay..
indio007
1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2016


Wow. A story on scientific fraud illicit no comments.


I'll comment ;)
Imagine if the ramblings of EU were subject to such oversight!


They weren't busted from oversight. Someone snitched them out. They had to snitch and keep snitching until something was finally done.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.