New insights on the safety of GM organisms

January 29, 2016
New insights on the safety of GM organisms

An EU project has undertaken extensive feeding trials to further inform the debate on the safety of mandatory GM animal feeding studies in advance of an expected 2016 EU re-evaluation.

The EU-funded GMO Risk Assessment and Communication of Evidence (GRACE) project was driven by the need to reconsider the value of rat feeding trials for the assessment of genetically modified (GM) plants.

The project also aimed to address the continued controversial debate on the safety of GM plants. To achieve this, it was organised around two primary work streams.

GRACE improved the interpretation of 90-day rat feeding trials, clarifying their added value and exploring alternative approaches to reduce or substitute animal trials with regards to GM plants. An additional one-year feeding trial was also conducted.

To facilitate this, the project team utilised MON810, a genetically modified maize that has been approved for cultivation across the world, including by the EU.

90-day and one-year feeding study results

When presenting their final results for the project, the team reported that they did not find any indication that a routine performance of 90-day feeding studies with whole food / feed would provide additional information on the safety of MON810 when compared to the compositional comparison of the GM variety.

Moreover, the 90-day feeding trials performed did not reveal any scientific trigger for an extension of the feeding period.

Data gathered in the course of an additional one-year feeding trial is in accordance with the conclusions made in the 90-day trials, in essence that feeding the rats MON810 did not lead to any adverse effects.

Additionally, the data collected by GRACE showed that non-targeted feeding studies could lead to randomlygenerated significant differences between animals fed with the GM test material and animals fed with a controlled diet. Such results are not informative for .

As such, GRACE data supports the scientific reasoning that feeding trials with whole food / feed may provide an added scientific value for the risk assessment of GM crops, but only in case a trigger is available from the initial molecular, compositional, phenotypic and / or agronomic analyses.

Thus, feeding trials might be considered, provided that the study design can be tailored to the posed safety concern.

Due to these limitations of rat feeding trials with GM whole food / feed, the project argues a mandatory performance in the course of GMO risk assessment cannot be justified in the light of the European goal to replace and reduce animal tests.

Assessing the overall debate on GM safety assessment

Regarding the project's second objective to address the overall debate on the safety of GM plants, researchers also established new and more comprehensive methods for systematically collecting and assessing existing scientific evidence on environmental, health and socio-economic risks and benefits for GM plants.

When testing these methods for the purpose of GMO risk research and assessment, it was confirmed that conclusions reached in previous assessments on insect resistant GM crops are still valid, with no effects documented on non-target organism populations, such as beetles and butterflies or to soil microorganisms, when compared to natural maize.

These final results from the project are now expected to provide valuable input into ongoing European debates regarding the safety and viability of GM plants and other organisms, particularly as the need for mandatory animal feeding studies in GMO risk assessment is due to be re-evaluated in 2016.

Explore further: GM crop database launched to ensure safety of EU animal feed supply

More information: For more information please see the GRACE project website: cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/124740_en.html

Related Stories

Most EU nations seek to bar GM crops

October 4, 2015

Nineteen of the 28 EU member states have applied to keep genetically modified crops out of all or part of their territory, the bloc's executive arm said Sunday, the deadline for opting out of new European legislation on GM ...

A European-wide network for systematic GMO impact assessment

October 17, 2012

The authors of this paper propose a framework for a European-wide network for systematic GMO impact assessment. This network aims at improving the regulatory system by enhancing and harmonizing the environmental risk assessment ...

Scotland to ban GM crops

August 9, 2015

Scotland is set to ban the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops, officials announced Sunday.

'EU reaches compromise deal on GM crops'

May 28, 2014

After years of fractious talks, EU states have finally reached a compromise to allow cultivation of genetically modified (GM) food crops by giving their opponents an opt out, official sources said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Gene "bookmarking" regulates the fate of stem cells

December 7, 2016

A protein that stays attached on chromosomes during cell division plays a critical role in determining the type of cell that stem cells can become. The discovery, made by EPFL scientists, has significant implications for ...

Some bats develop resistance to devastating fungal disease

December 6, 2016

Bat populations in some places in North America appear to have developed resistance to the deadly fungal disease known as white-nose syndrome. Researchers from UC Santa Cruz analyzed infection data and population trends of ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TogetherinParis
1 / 5 (1) Jan 31, 2016
EU government must be informed by EU science surely? Why this incompetence? GMO's pose no risk whatsoever anywhere to anything. It is a silly idea.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.