LRO finds Apollo 16 booster rocket impact site

December 4, 2015
Credit: NASA/Goddard/Arizona State University

After decades of uncertainty, the Apollo 16 S-IVB impact site on the lunar surface has been identified. S-IVBs were portions of the Saturn V rockets that brought astronauts to the moon. The site was identified in imagery from the high-resolution LROC Narrow Angle Camera aboard NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

Beginning with Apollo 13, the S-IVB rocket stages were deliberately impacted on the after they were used. Seismometers placed on the moon by earlier Apollo astronauts measured the energy of these impacts to shed light on the internal lunar structure. Locations of the craters that the boosters left behind were estimated from tracking data collected just prior to the impacts.

Earlier in the LRO mission, the Apollo 13, 14, 15 and 17 impact sites were successfully identified, but Apollo 16's remained elusive. In the case of Apollo 16, radio contact with the booster was lost before the impact, so the location was only poorly known. Positive identification of the Apollo 16 S-IVB site took more time than the other four because the location ended up differing by about 30 km (about 19 miles) from the Apollo-era tracking estimate. (For comparison, the other four S-IVB craters were all within 7 km—about four miles—of their estimated locations.)

Apollo 16's S-IVB stage is on Mare Insularum, about 160 miles southwest of Copernicus Crater (more precisely: 1.921 degrees north, 335.377 degrees east, minus 1,104 meters elevation).

Explore further: LRO Sees Apollo 14's Rocket Booster Impact Site

Related Stories

LRO Sees Apollo 14's Rocket Booster Impact Site

October 8, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A distinctive crater about 35 meters (115 feet) in diameter was formed when the Apollo 14 Saturn IVB (upper stage) was intentionally impacted into the moon. The energy of the impact created small tremors ...

Watch all six Apollo Moon landings at once

October 23, 2013

So often, when we think of all the Apollo missions to the Moon, we recall the videos of the astronauts walking, jumping and driving around on the Moon. But the actual landing of the Lunar Module was such a key – if not ...

Image: Soaring over Lunar Mt. Hadley

June 19, 2014

(Phys.org) —Apollo mission planners selected an adventurous landing site for Apollo 15 located on a relatively small patch of lava plains, called "mare" on the moon. This site is nestled between the towering Apennine mountains ...

Thousands of photos by Apollo astronauts now on Flickr

October 6, 2015

A cache of more than 8,400 high-resolution photographs taken by Apollo astronauts during trips to the moon is now available for viewing and download. Kipp Teague, who created the massive image repository Project Apollo Archive ...

Recommended for you

Fossilized rivers suggest warm, wet ancient Mars

August 23, 2016

Extensive systems of fossilised riverbeds have been discovered on an ancient region of the Martian surface, supporting the idea that the now cold and dry Red Planet had a warm and wet climate about 4 billion years ago, according ...

Image: Planck's flame-filled view of the Polaris Flare

August 23, 2016

This image from ESA's Planck satellite appears to show something quite ethereal and fantastical: a sprite-like figure emerging from scorching flames and walking towards the left of the frame, its silhouette a blaze of warm-hued ...

What do aliens look like? The clue is in evolution

August 19, 2016

Speculating about what aliens look like has kept children, film producers and scientists amused for decades. If they exist, will extra terrestrials turn out to look similar to us, or might they take a form beyond our wildest ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
5 / 5 (5) Dec 04, 2015
Looks like there's a bit of the stage still in one piece. Would be interesting to take a closer look.
Vietvet
5 / 5 (2) Dec 04, 2015
I down loaded the pic so I could zoom in. To me it appears badly mangled but still in one piece.
It would take a higher resolution pic to be definitive.
Burnerjack
5 / 5 (6) Dec 04, 2015
All those Apollo conspiracy theorists are going to be infuriated by this. Can't wait to see the fallout.
SuperThunder
3.3 / 5 (6) Dec 06, 2015
We've got to build a museum around it for the first moon tourists. Imagine how cool that will be for kids in the 27th century on field trips. I bet aliens would like to see it too if there's ever any interstellar tourism.
barakn
4 / 5 (4) Dec 06, 2015
The impact was at 5800 mph, so any visible pieces are likely only in your imagination.
Eikka
5 / 5 (2) Dec 07, 2015
The impact was at 5800 mph, so any visible pieces are likely only in your imagination.


That depends. The empty stage was basically a hollow thin walled tank with some low-pressure gas inside.

It either acted like an airbag, or, burst into trillion pieces.
barakn
1 / 5 (1) Dec 07, 2015
No. The velocity of shear waves in aluminum is roughly 3200-3300 m/s, longitudinal waves 6400 m/s or 14,000 mph. Even if there was a shock wave traveling faster than the longitudinal speed, the far side of the booster would be essentially unaware that the first side had contacted. It takes very roughly 400,000 J to melt a kg of aluminum but each kg arrived with 6,760,000 J, so that first side would have melted and partially vaporized, along with a large amount of lunar regolith. The trivial amount of gas inside would not have time to escape from the sides, and would instead get compressed and heated. The far side of the tank would almost immediately impact with the same overwhelming energy, leading to an explosion from within a self-made hole in the lunar surface. I'm not sure why you think any part would survive.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.