Researchers propose new kind of MOF to clean coal burned in power plants

December 21, 2015 by Bob Yirka report
Nanoporous structure of 1. Credit: Science Advances (2015). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500421

(Phys.org)—A small team of researchers with members from India, Canada, the U.S. and Germany has come up with a new kind of metal-organic framework (MOF) to keep carbon in coal from entering the atmosphere when it is burned in power plants—thus reducing pollution and problems with global warming. In their paper published in the journal Science Advances, the team describes their new technique, and what hurdles need to be overcome for it to be used in commercial plants.

As the researchers note, most of the effort currently put into making coal a cleaner fuel source revolve around capturing the carbon dioxide that is released when coal is burned. They suggest a better alternative might be to separate out the carbon dioxide as part of the burning process, leaving clean hydrogen gas as the actual fuel used to heat water to turn turbines.

The new MOF proposed by the team involves the use of nickel and isonicotinic acid as a sponge to pull the carbon from the coal. It would be part of a process that involves burning the with steam under cycles of high and low pressure. They claim their approach is twice as efficient as other sponge methods and that it is also simpler, faster to make and is not harmed by moisture, making it easy to store and transfer materials.

The big catch with the process is what to do with the carbon dioxide that is separated out—capturing it, holding on to it, transporting it and ultimately storing it would represent a substantial cost outlay for any given utility, which at this point, would appear to be prohibitively high for plants that are attempting to keep electricity costs down in places where locals could not afford higher rates, such as is the case in parts of India, China and many third-world countries.

In speaking with the press, one of the researchers, Ramanathan Vaidhyanathan, suggested that this might be an issue to be brought before an international forum such as the recent Paris Climate Change Conference. He notes that rather than storing the , it might be used in industrial applications, such as oil extraction or for creating new compounds.

Explore further: A milestone for new carbon-dioxide capture/clean coal technology

More information: S. Nandi et al. A single-ligand ultra-microporous MOF for precombustion CO2 capture and hydrogen purification, Science Advances (2015). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500421

Abstract
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) built from a single small ligand typically have high stability, are rigid, and have syntheses that are often simple and easily scalable. However, they are normally ultra-microporous and do not have large surface areas amenable to gas separation applications. We report an ultra-microporous (3.5 and 4.8 Å pores) Ni-(4-pyridylcarboxylate)2 with a cubic framework that exhibits exceptionally high CO2/H2 selectivities (285 for 20:80 and 230 for 40:60 mixtures at 10 bar, 40°C) and working capacities (3.95 mmol/g), making it suitable for hydrogen purification under typical precombustion CO2 capture conditions (1- to 10-bar pressure swing). It exhibits facile CO2 adsorption-desorption cycling and has CO2 self-diffusivities of ~3 × 10−9 m2/s, which is two orders higher than that of zeolite 13X and comparable to other top-performing MOFs for this application. Simulations reveal a high density of binding sites that allow for favorable CO2-CO2 interactions and large cooperative binding energies. Ultra-micropores generated by a small ligand ensures hydrolytic, hydrostatic stabilities, shelf life, and stability toward humid gas streams.

Related Stories

Greenhouse gas-caused warming felt in just months

June 2, 2015

The heat generated by burning a fossil fuel is surpassed within a few months by the warming caused by the release of its carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, according to new work from Carnegie's Xiaochun Zhang and Ken Caldeira ...

Capturing and converting CO2 in a single step

August 11, 2015

Turning carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants into a more valuable chemical would reduce carbon emissions while creating a revenue return. At the University of Pittsburgh, researchers computationally derived a metal-free ...

Britain indicates phase-out of coal power plants

November 18, 2015

Britain is to signal the winding down of polluting coal-fired power plants, indicating they should be replaced with gas and nuclear stations, according to pre-released parts of a Wednesday speech.

Recommended for you

New electrical energy storage material shows its power

August 24, 2016

A powerful new material developed by Northwestern University chemist William Dichtel and his research team could one day speed up the charging process of electric cars and help increase their driving range.

Calcium channel blockers caught in the act at atomic level

August 24, 2016

An atomic level analysis has revealed how two classes of calcium channel blockers, widely prescribed for heart disease patients, produce separate therapeutic effects through their actions at different sites on the calcium ...

Bio-inspired tire design: Where the rubber meets the road

August 24, 2016

The fascination with the ability of geckos to scamper up smooth walls and hang upside down from improbable surfaces has entranced scientists at least as far back as Aristotle, who noted the reptile's remarkable feats in his ...

Selecting the right house plant could improve indoor air

August 24, 2016

Indoor air pollution is an important environmental threat to human health, leading to symptoms of "sick building syndrome." But researchers report that surrounding oneself with certain house plants could combat the potentially ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

hemitite
not rated yet Dec 21, 2015
Why sequester the CO2? Just recycle it back into hydrocarbons using wind and or solar power, and then repeat.
KelDude
3 / 5 (2) Dec 21, 2015
We shouldn't be burning coal at all. The open pit mining on the top of mountains to retrieve the coal is even worse than the CO2 problem. So cleaning up the output smoke of CO2 does nothing for the filthy, polluting and deadly dust creating process of mining coal. Stop now! Coal had its day, time to change. Capturing the CO2 then turning it back into fuel and burning it again isn't a satifactory solution. Capturing and sequestering or capturing and using the carbon to create carbon monoxide (CO) instead as feed stock to a ton of industries would make sense but you're still stuck with the filthy mining side. Its really a no win product.
MR166
1 / 5 (2) Dec 21, 2015
OOps, file this under getting ready for the coming cooling.

http://www.expres...ays-NASA
Vietvet
5 / 5 (4) Dec 21, 2015
@MR166

You must not have read past the misleading headline.

"This means that Earth's climate sensitivity to carbon dioxide—or atmospheric carbon dioxide's capacity to affect temperature change—has been underestimated, according to the study."

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which draws its TCR estimate from earlier research, places the future estimate rise at 1.8°F (1.0°C).

But the new NASA study dovetails with a GISS study published last year that puts the TCR value at 3.0°F (1.7° C).

Mr Schmidt said: "If you've got a systematic underestimate of what the greenhouse gas-driven change would be, then you're systematically underestimating what's going to happen in the future when greenhouse gases are by far the dominant climate driver."
Mike_Massen
1 / 5 (4) Dec 25, 2015
MR166 with his cooling claim yet again
OOps, file this under getting ready for the coming cooling.http://www.expres...ays-NASA
MR166, have been asking you many times just why you ignore radiative heat transfer or find any paper anywhere ever which even touches on a suggestion its wrong - where MR166 wassup ?

ie
Core Physics re heat/statistical mechanics is fact light's emitted/absorbed, known >100yrs !
https://en.wikipe...transfer
which leads to
https://en.wikipe..._forcing
Which shows we are getting increased heat retention & at accelerated rate !

So although you seem to laud over local cooling for obvious superficial reasons, you can't seem to get your head around a minor complexity that once ice melts and its then still cold water it cools the region more than before that ice melted, Eg regions of East Coast US.

MR166 think & observe globe...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.