Jury sides against Cox in 'trailblazing' music piracy case

December 17, 2015 byTali Arbel

A Virginia jury has issued a $25 million verdict against Cox Communications in an online piracy case that could mean more trouble for downloaders of illegal content.

Music company BMG had sued Cox in 2014, saying the cable company wasn't forwarding warnings about illegal downloads to its customers or stopping their behavior, even when the cable company knew about it.

Both sides saw this case as "trailblazing," said Marquette University Law School professor Bruce Boyden, and it makes clear that Internet service providers, or ISPs, are obliged to respond to takedown notices from rights holders.

The jury said Thursday that Cox customers infringed on BMG copyrights by uploading or downloading its songs on file-sharing BitTorrent systems, and that Cox was liable.

Cox spokesman Todd Smith said the Atlanta company is considering its options, including appeal.

Attorney Michael Allan, the lead counsel for BMG, said in an emailed statement that the decision "sends a message to ISPs that they have a responsibility to act upon and limit the massive copyright infringement using their networks that has been brought to their attention by copyright owners."

Boyden said that after this case, customers will be more likely to get forwarded copyright infringement notices from an ISP. These notices can tell customers how to settle with rights holders.

And, assuming that the case is appealed and upheld, he said that "cautious" ISPs would be more likely to consider cutting off service to repeat offenders.

Several major cable and phone companies (but not Cox) were already participating in a voluntary copyright alert system that pinged customers for illegal sharing. Customers who ignored warnings could have their home Internet service temporarily slowed or downgraded.

Explore further: AT&T to start sending copyright warnings

Related Stories

AT&T to start sending copyright warnings

March 26, 2009

(AP) -- AT&T Inc., the nation's largest Internet service provider, will start sending warnings to its subscribers when music labels and movie studios allege that they are trafficking in pirated material, according to an ...

Cox kills Sprint-based cellphone service

November 16, 2011

(AP) -- Cox Communications, the country's third-largest cable company, stopped offering cellphone service Wednesday, saying it's too small to compete with the big phone companies.

Cox plans gigabit Internet speeds in three cities

May 22, 2014

Cable company Cox Communications says it plans to boost Internet download speeds to 1 gigabit per second starting in Phoenix, Las Vegas and Omaha, Nebraska, late this year. That is dozens of times faster than typical broadband ...

British online piracy deal close

May 9, 2014

Entertainment industry bodies and Internet service providers in Britain are on the verge of striking a deal to combat piracy, authorities said on Friday.

Cox agrees to sell wireless spectrum to Verizon

December 16, 2011

(AP) -- Cable company Cox Communications on Friday said that it has agreed to sell some of its airwave licenses to Verizon Wireless for $315 million and will resell Verizon service in its stores.

Recommended for you

Microsoft aims at Apple with high-end PCs, 3D software

October 26, 2016

Microsoft launched a new consumer offensive Wednesday, unveiling a high-end computer that challenges the Apple iMac along with an updated Windows operating system that showcases three-dimensional content and "mixed reality."

Making it easier to collaborate on code

October 26, 2016

Git is an open-source system with a polarizing reputation among programmers. It's a powerful tool to help developers track changes to code, but many view it as prohibitively difficult to use.

Dutch unveil giant vacuum to clean outside air

October 25, 2016

Dutch inventors Tuesday unveiled what they called the world's first giant outside air vacuum cleaner—a large purifying system intended to filter out toxic tiny particles from the atmosphere surrounding the machine.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 17, 2015
They chose not to participate in a voluntary program that has no legal authority, no allowance for fair use and where you are automatically assumed to be guilty. Your only option of fighting the charges are paying to go to an arbitrator who not surprisingly agrees with the giant company that gives them business over the little no name person that just paid their fee to be told, nope you are guilty. If Cox is smart, they will get together with the EFF to figure out how to tackle this horrible ruling.
1 / 5 (2) Dec 17, 2015
Just start pirating things to physical media and go back to the postal service for sharing, like humans did for a hundred years before the Internet. Most of the media so pirated never required the Internet to exist, so doesn't require it to be disseminated. There is an entirely empty world offline with no art, music, or anything really left in the void of the Internet. It could be filled again.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.