Do we really want to awaken the alien force?

December 9, 2015 by Roy Rivenburg
SETI's Allen Telescope Array searches the stars for extraterrestrial radio signals. Credit: SETI

While politicians quibble over how to deal with illegal immigration, an ominous group of foreigners goes unaddressed: space aliens.

Should humans try to contact creatures from other galaxies? Do we really want that force awakened? For scientists, this isn't some esoteric question. The fate of the planet may be at stake.

In recent years, a fierce debate has erupted over proposals to beam messages toward distant solar systems. Until now, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence – or SETI – has largely been limited to listening for radio signals from other galaxies. Having failed to detect a single peep, some scientists want to turn the tables and begin broadcasting missives from Earth into deep space.

But that creates two dilemmas.

First and foremost is the possibility of connecting with hostile civilizations. Should we risk announcing our location to real-life equivalents of Klingons or Stormtroopers? As physicist Stephen Hawking warned in 2010, "If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn't turn out well for the Native Americans."

The second quandary is how to communicate with creatures from another world.

The traditional assumption is that photos or other visual are a universal language that any advanced life form could understand. In reality, it's extremely unlikely that extraterrestrials would see things as humans do, says Don Hoffman, professor of cognitive sciences at the University of California, Irvine.

"The assumption that what we intend to communicate will be received as we intended it could be devastatingly dangerous," Hoffman says.

Even on our own planet, eyesight varies widely, he notes. Bats perceive the world via radar. Indian pythons see in infrared. And honeybees navigate by detecting polarized light.

Differences in vision also occur within species. For example, nearly one in five women is born with an extra photoreceptor gene and sees colors invisible to everyone else, according to research led by Kimberly Jameson of UCI's Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences.

So it stands to reason that beings from other galaxies would evolve sight systems unlike anything on Earth, Hoffman says. Even if extraterrestrials somehow did develop human-style eyes, they wouldn't interpret images the same way we do, he says.

A few years ago, at a SETI Institute conference on interstellar communication, Hoffman appeared on the bill after a presentation by radio astronomer Frank Drake, who pioneered the search for alien civilizations in 1960. Drake showed the audience dozens of images that had been launched into space aboard NASA's Voyager probes in the 1970s. Each picture was carefully chosen to be clearly and easily understood by other intelligent beings, he told the crowd.

After Drake spoke, Hoffman took the stage and "politely explained how every one of the images would be infinitely ambiguous to extraterrestrials," he recalls.

Evolution and culture shape how a brain processes and interprets visual stimuli, Hoffman says. To someone raised in a remote jungle, for instance, a mushroom cloud would mean something very different than it does to an average American. And even the American's perception isn't an accurate reflection of reality, he says.

Hoffman likens the images our brain "sees" of the world around us to desktop icons on a computer screen, which bear no physical resemblance to the electronics inside. As evidence, his website features optical illusions that demonstrate how the mind can misread and distort external input.

Thus, attempts to communicate visually with space beings are bound to fail, Hoffman says. "Even the simplest of images will be misinterpreted," he concludes in a paper on interstellar messages.

Would sound work better, perhaps along the lines of the synthesizer tones used to communicate with extraterrestrials in "Close Encounters of the Third Kind"?

In 1977, Voyager rocketed into space carrying recordings of animal noises, poetry readings and a library of music, from classical to Chuck Berry. The mission prompted "Saturday Night Live" to joke that aliens had intercepted the craft and transmitted a four-word reply to Earth: "Send more Chuck Berry."

In truth, Voyager's audio cargo would undoubtedly mystify any interplanetary astronauts who stumbled upon it, Hoffman says.

Again, evolutionary differences interfere. "We can't even understand the language of dolphins despite decades of effort," he says. The chance of aliens deciphering our words are similarly remote: "About zero," according to Hoffman.

Explore further: How to Respond When E.T. Says Hello

Related Stories

How to Respond When E.T. Says Hello

April 1, 2010

Scientists are studying the best ways to compose messages meant for alien eyes in case we ever do get the chance to communicate with extraterrestrials.

Talking to aliens

November 17, 2014

What do you say to a space alien? This question might not be the foremost puzzle in your life, but it was the subject of a lively two-day conference at California's SETI Institute this week.

Will SETI's unprecedented new program finally find E.T.?

August 4, 2015

Stephen Hawking, Frank Drake and dozens of journalists gathered at the Royal Society in London last week to hear astronomers announce a ground-breaking new project to search for intelligent extraterrestrial life called "Breakthrough ...

SETI scientists say it's time to send messages to ET

February 14, 2015

Scientists want to contact extraterrestrial civilizations. Some applause the effort. Others say this is not a good plan at all. The idea is for messages encoded in radio signals to be sent repeatedly for hundreds of years ...

Refining the search for what's 'out there'

October 15, 2010

Gregory Benford, his brother James and his nephew Dominic decided to combine their knowledge of astrophysics, space, microwaves and economics to look at the search for extraterrestrial life from a money perspective. They ...

Recommended for you

Scientists investigate unidentified radio sources

September 28, 2016

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers led by Andrea Maselli of the Institute of Space Astrophysics and Cosmic Physics of Palermo, Italy, has conducted an observational campaign of a group of unassociated radio sources with NASA's ...

Research resolves a debate over 'killer electrons' in space

September 28, 2016

New findings by a UCLA-led international team of researchers answer a fundamental question about our space environment and will help scientists develop methods to protect valuable telecommunication and navigation satellites. ...

Kepler watched a Cepheid star boil

September 28, 2016

After four years of continuous monitoring, astronomers detected clear signs of convective cells in a giant pulsating star for the first time using the Kepler space telescope.

The ultraviolet diversity of supernovae

September 28, 2016

Supernovae, the explosive deaths of massive stars, are among the most momentous events in the cosmos because they disburse into space all of the chemical elements that were produced inside their progenitor stars, including ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Modulus64
5 / 5 (1) Dec 09, 2015
Lots of empty planets to colonize.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.