Smart farming the key to China's food problems, study says

Sep 03, 2014
High-yielding rice in demonstration plots. Credit: Fusuo Zhang

Clever farming techniques would provide China with more than enough grain to feed its escalating population in the coming decades while easing stress on its environment, scientists reported on Wednesday.

China faces a double crunch as its population of 1.35 billion rises to an expected peak of 1.47 billion in 2030, which will require more than 650 million tonnes of rice, wheat and corn annually, they said.

The challenge coincides with accelerating climate change, soil degradation, growing competition for water and land from cities and for food that is likely to double by 2050.

Writing in the journal Nature, a team led by Fusuo Zhang at the China Agricultural University in Beijing reported on a three-year experiment on how to improve yields on existing land.

They carried out dozens of field trials in the country's main grain-farming belts, where they grew plots of cereals using four different agricultural techniques.

One technique was to grow the cereals according to the practice of local farmers, and the second was a tweaked, or "improved," version of the same method.

The third was maximisation of yield without regard for the environment, which often entailed dousing fields with nitrogen fertiliser.

The fourth technique used modern crop and nutrient management, harnessing knowledge of the right strains of crops to match local soils and climate, more accurate dates for sowing and a smarter density of sowing, and using inputs efficiently.

The highest yield came from the third option.

It saw average local yields of rice jump from 7.2 tonnes to 8.8 tonnes per hectare (2.9 tonnes to 3.5 tonnes per acre), while the wheat harvest leapt from 7.2 tonnes to 9.2 tonnes, and corn (maize) from 10.5 tonnes to 14.4 tonnes.

This came close to record yields for those grains in intensive farms in the United States and Germany.

But the smart farming technique, called integrated soil-crop system management (ISSM), did extremely well, according to the investigators.

It typically came within 97-99 percent of the maximised yield but at far less cost to the environment.

Yields under ISSM rose to 8.5, 8.9 and 14.2 tonnes per hectare for rice, wheat and corn respectively, without any increase in .

Option No. 2—the "improved" local practice of farming—achieved 88-92 percent of the maximised yields.

Computer simulations suggest that by using ISSM, excessive use of nitrogen and emissions of greenhouse gases "are reduced substantially," the study said.

"If farmers in China could achieve average grain yields equivalent to 80 percent of this treatment by 2030, over the same planting area as in 2012, total production of rice, wheat and maize in China would be more than enough to meet the demand for direct human consumption and a substantially increased demand for animal feed, while decreasing the environmental costs of intensive agriculture," it said.

Explore further: Curbing pesticides will slash wheat yields, study says

More information: Paper -

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study raises concerns about global crop projections

Dec 20, 2013

About 30 percent of the major global cereal crops – rice, wheat and corn – may have reached their maximum possible yields in farmers' fields, according to University of Nebraska-Lincoln research published this week in ...

Changing diets favour meat and milk producers: FAO

Jul 11, 2014

The UN food agency FAO on Friday predicted that global farming will move increasingly towards meat and milk production and away from traditional rice and grain agriculture in line with changing consumer tastes.

Recommended for you

Far more displaced by disasters than conflict

29 minutes ago

Disasters last year displaced three times more people than violent conflicts, showing the urgent need to improve resilience for vulnerable people when fighting climate change, according to a study issued ...

Coral growth rate plummets in 30-year comparison

7 hours ago

A team of researchers working on a Carnegie expedition in Australia's Great Barrier Reef has documented that coral growth rates have plummeted 40% since the mid-1970s. The scientists suggest that ocean acidification ...

Environmentalists and industry duke it out over plastic bags

8 hours ago

Campaigns against disposable plastic shopping bags and their environmental impact recently scored a major win. In August, California lawmakers passed the first statewide ban on the bags, and Governor Jerry Brown is expected ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (6) Sep 03, 2014
Excellent study. Also, a correction to this statement by the author of the news item (not the authors of the study):

The challenge coincides with accelerating climate change...

Climate change (meaning global warming) is not accelerating. It appears to be decelerating lately. There has been no warming since 1998 and the warming period from 1970 to 1998 is comparable to the warming from 1910 to 1940 (followed by 30 years of cooling). For example, see here:


The only place warming seems to be accelerating is in theoretical studies modeled on computers where CO2 drives warming. The climate models apparently overstate the impact of CO2 as measured warming is much less than projected. See this graph from the latest IPCC AR5 comparing computer models to measurements:


5 / 5 (4) Sep 03, 2014
aksdad apparently doesn't believe that the oceans (which have warmed considerably since 1998) are part of our climate system. That is stupid, and so is aksdad.
1 / 5 (2) Sep 03, 2014
Smart farming is the key to feed Zimbabwe.
Smart farming is the key to feed the world.
2 / 5 (4) Sep 03, 2014
Smart farming is having government out of farming.
5 / 5 (3) Sep 03, 2014
aksdad shows narrow reading/research skills with
It appears to be decelerating lately.
Hung up on appearances it seems - try learning some Science ie Specific Heat, Statistical Mechanics, Properties of water especially ~80times heat capacity of melting ice than water !

Melting ice doesn't just soak up massive amounts of heat with NO change in temperature locally, it also lowers the temperature of the accompanying heat source, it is extremely complex to assess given shifting ocean currents & more data is needed...

Please see the evidence & don't bark narrow uneducated propagandist redneck tripe.



Do the Simple math - ratio of specific heats in conjunction with the other dynamic factors:-