Brain circuit differences reflect divisions in social status

Sep 02, 2014
Barbary macaques. Credit: Wikipedia/Flickr/Karyn Sig

Life at opposite ends of primate social hierarchies is linked to specific brain networks, a new Oxford University study has shown.

The importance of is something we all learn at an early age. In non-human primates, social dominance influences access to food and mates. In humans, social hierarchies influence our performance everywhere from school to the workplace and have a direct influence on our well-being and mental health. Life on the lowest rung can be stressful, but life at the top also requires careful acts of balancing and coalition forming. However, we know very little about the relationship between these social ranks and brain function.

The new research, conducted at the University of Oxford, reveals differences between individual primate's brains which depend on the their social status. The more dominant you are, the bigger some are. If your is more subordinate, other brain regions are bigger. Additionally, the way the brain regions interact with each other is also associated with social status. The pattern of results suggests that successful behaviour at each end of the social scale makes specialised demands of the brain.

The research, led by Dr MaryAnn Noonan of the Decision and Action Laboratory at the University of Oxford, determined the position of 25 macaque monkeys in their social hierarchy and then analysed non-invasive scans of their brains that had been collected as part of other ongoing University research programs. The findings, publishing September 2 in the open access journal PLOS Biology, show that brain regions in one neural circuit are larger in more dominant animals. The regions composing this circuit are the amygdala, raphe nucleus and hypothalamus. Previous research has shown that the amygdala is involved in learning, and processing social and emotional information. The raphe nucleus and hypothalamus are involved in controlling neurotransmitters and neurohormones, such as serotonin and oxytocin. The MRI scans also revealed that another circuit of brain regions, which collectively can be called the striatum, were found to be larger in more subordinate animals. The striatum is known to play a complex but important role in learning the value of our choices and actions.

The study also reports that the brain's activity, not just its structure, varies with position in the . The researchers found that the strength with which activity in some of these areas was coupled together was also related to social status. Collectively, these results mean that social status is not only reflected in the brain's hardware, it is also related to differences in the brain's software, or communication patterns.

Finally, the size of another set of brain regions correlated not only with social status but also with the size of the animal's social group. The macaque groups ranged in size between one and seven. The research showed that grey matter in regions involved in social cognition, such as the mid-superior temporal sulcus and rostral prefrontal cortex, correlated with both group size and social status. Previous research has shown that these regions are important for a variety of social behaviours, such as interpreting facial expressions or physical gestures, understanding the intentions of others and predicting their behaviour.

"This finding may reflect the fact that social status in macaques depends not only on the outcome of competitive social interactions but on social bonds formed that promote coalitions," says Matthew Rushworth, the head of the Decision and Action Laboratory in Oxford. "The correlation with social group size and suggests this set of brain regions may coordinate behaviour that bridges these two social variables".

The results suggest that just as animals assign value to environmental stimuli they may also assign values to themselves – 'self-values'. Social rank is likely to be an important determinant of such self-values. We already know that some of the brain regions identified in the current study track the value of objects in our environment and so may also play a key role in monitoring longer-term values associated with an individual's status.

The reasons behind the identified brain differences remain unclear, particularly whether they are present at birth or result from social differences. Dr Noonan said: "One possibility is that the demands of a life in a particular social position use certain brain regions more frequently and as a result those areas expand to step up to the task. Alternatively, it is possible that people born with brains organised in a particular way tend towards certain social positions. In all likelihood, both of these mechanisms will work together to produce behaviour appropriate for the social context".

Social status also changes over time and in different contexts. Dr Noonan added: "While we might be top-dog in one circle of friends, at work we might be more of a social climber. The fluidity of our social position and how our brains adapt our behavior to succeed in each context is the next exciting direction for this area of research."

Explore further: Team studies the social origins of intelligence in the brain

More information: The paper, A neural circuit covarying with social hierarchy in macaques, is due to be published in the journal PLOS Biology on September 2, 2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New links between social status and brain activity

Nov 13, 2013

New studies released today reveal links between social status and specific brain structures and activity, particularly in the context of social stress. The findings were presented at Neuroscience 2013, the annual meeting ...

Monkeys with larger friend networks have more gray matter

Nov 04, 2011

New research in the UK on rhesus macaque monkeys has found for the first time that if they live in larger groups they develop more gray matter in parts of the brain involved in processing information on social ...

Our own status affects the way our brains respond to others

Apr 28, 2011

Our own social status influences the way our brains respond to others of higher or lower rank, according to a new study reported online on April 28 in Current Biology. People of higher subjective socioeconomic status show g ...

Recommended for you

A vegetarian carnivorous plant

Dec 19, 2014

Carnivorous plants catch and digest tiny animals in order and derive benefits for their nutrition. Interestingly the trend towards vegetarianism seems to overcome carnivorous plants as well. The aquatic carnivorous bladderwort, ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

thingumbobesquire
3 / 5 (2) Sep 03, 2014
So Prince Charles has one of the biggest brains in the world? Then why does he talk to plants?
JVK
1 / 5 (4) Sep 03, 2014
"...brain regions in one neural circuit are larger in more dominant animals. The regions composing this circuit are the amygdala, raphe nucleus and hypothalamus. Previous research has shown that the amygdala is involved in learning, and processing social and emotional information. The raphe nucleus and hypothalamus are involved in controlling neurotransmitters and neurohormones, such as serotonin and oxytocin."

Does anyone else recognize that the epigenetic link to cell type differentiation in these brain cells is nutrient-dependent and controlled by nutrient stress and social stress via their effects on the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal system, which links the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of DNA in the organized genomes of all mammals?

Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model. http://www.ncbi.n...24693353

JVK
1 / 5 (4) Sep 07, 2014
Discussion of this topic continues at: https://www.faceb...f_t=like

See also:
http://bfg.oxford...050.long

Excerpt from my most recent comment: The nutrient-dependent epigenetic effects of olfactory/pheromonal input are manifested in the morphological and behavioral phenotypes of the honeybee model organisms, which links epigenetic cause and effect to hormones that alter hormone-organized and hormone-activated human behavior. How can people like Dean Whittington continue to participate here, when they know nothing about neuroscience?

Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (2) Sep 08, 2014
Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model
this causes mutations but you also say
Mutations cause diseases and disorders via perturbed protein folding
SO, when you said that YOUR MODEL CAUSES MUTATIONS, per your own words previously,
then you are saying YOUR MODEL ONLY CAUSES DISEASES AND DISORDERS?

that is the ONLY way you can take this, by the way...
after all, YOU have already claimed,
in YOUR OWN WORDS,
that your model causes mutations,

so by saying that mutations ONLY cause diseases and disorders, your are saying that your own model is only good for causing DISEASES and DISORDERS...

YOUR WORDS
NOT MINE

so, you NOT know what you are saying, and you are considered a PSEUDOSCIENCE CRACKPOT

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.