Thermoelectric devices turn waste heat into electricity for vehicles and other machines

Aug 11, 2014 by Rob Matheson
This image shows the inside of GMZ Energy's TEG module. When waste heat enters the top of the module, and moves through the semiconductor material (shown here as P and N) to the cooler side, the resulting temperature difference creates a voltage that’s extracted as electricity. Credit: Screenshot from a video by GMZ Energy

It's estimated that more than half of U.S. energy—from vehicles and heavy equipment, for instance—is wasted as heat. Mostly, this waste heat simply escapes into the air. But that's beginning to change, thanks to thermoelectric innovators such as MIT's Gang Chen.

Thermoelectric materials convert temperature differences into electric voltage. About a decade ago, Chen, the Carl Richard Soderberg Professor of Power Engineering and head of MIT's Department of Mechanical Engineering, used nanotechnology to restructure and dramatically boost the efficiency of one such material, paving the way for more cost-effective thermoelectric devices.

Using this method, GMZ Energy, a company co-founded by Chen and collaborator Zhifeng Ren of the University of Houston, has now created a (TEG)—a one-square-inch, quarter-inch-thick module—that turns emitted by vehicles into electricity to lend those vehicles added power.

"Everybody recognizes the great potential of waste , but the challenge has always been that not many think seriously about systems that can turn that heat into power," Chen says. "It's not just waste heat, it's wasted potential to do useful work."

In a TEG, electricity is generated when heat enters the top of the module, and then moves through the semiconductor material—packed into the TEG—to the cooler side. The resulting motion of electrons in the semiconductor under this temperature difference creates a voltage that's extracted as electricity.

However, in many TEGs, atomic vibrations in the material can also leak heat from the hot to the cold side. GMZ's method essentially slows the heat leakage, leading to a 30 to 60 percent increase in performance across many thermoelectric materials.

The company's TEG can withstand temperatures of roughly 600 degrees Celsius on its hot side (top surface), while maintaining a temperature of 100 C on its cold side (bottom surface). With this gradient of 500 C, a module that's 4 centimeters squared can produce 7.2 watts of power. Installed near a car's exhaust pipe, for instance, this converted electricity could power the car's electrical components, essentially reducing the load on the vehicle's alternator, reducing fuel costs and overall emissions.

In June, GMZ successfully generated 200 watts from a larger TEG as part of $1.5 million program supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The goal is to eventually integrate multiple 200-watt TEGs into the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, a U.S. military tank, to produce 1,000 watts, helping save on fuel consumed on the battlefield, which can cost $40 per gallon.

GMZ is also working under another $9 million DOE grant as part of a program to improve fuel economy in passenger vehicles by 25 percent. GMZ has plans to soon apply its TEGs to cars, with aims of improving efficiency by 5 percent.

Decades in the making

The concept of thermoelectrics dates back to 1821. Initially called the Seebeck effect, after its discoverer Thomas Seebeck, it derives from heating one end of a conductive material—a semiconductor, for example—to cause electrons to move to the cooler end, producing an electric current. Applying a current to the material, in turn, carries heat from the hot to the cool end.

Thermoelectric technologies picked up steam in the 1950s, as companies and research labs started funding projects to bring the technology to real-world applications. Although these efforts led to niche applications in refrigeration and sensors, large-scale applications did not materialize, because thermoelectric materials are notoriously inefficient: While these materials conduct electricity well, they also conduct heat well, so they'd equalize temperature quickly, leading to a low efficiency.

The field remained stagnant for decades. Then, in the 1990s, researchers—including Institute Professor Emeritus Mildred Dresselhaus at MIT—began using nanotechnology to restructure for greater efficiency.

Chen arrived at MIT in 2001 after researching thin films and nanowire-based thermoelectrics for four years at the University of California at Los Angeles, including a long-distance collaboration with Dresselhaus. At MIT, he continued his collaboration with Dresselhaus and brought in Ren, a materials expert, to develop new materials.

Then, in 2008, Chen, Ren, and Dresselhaus met another milestone: They realized a 40 percent increase in the efficiency of bismuth antimony telluride—materials used in thermoelectric coolers—using an inexpensive process.

As described in a Science paper that year, Chen and his team crushed the material into a nanoscopic dust and reconstituted it in bulk form—with grains and irregularities that dramatically slowed the passage of phonons through the material. (Phonons, a quantum mode of vibration, are primary means of heat conduction.) This reined in the heat leakage, while allowing for the free flow of electrons.

Using a cost-effective and safe alloy in bulk form meant the material could be applied to a variety of applications. And Chen saw that the method—"now widely used around the world," he says—was ripe for commercialization. "With thermoelectrics, you're always doing research for potential application," he says. "Once the material was good, it was time to move."

The world "needs a device"

To branch out into a startup, Chen found inspiration from MIT's entrepreneurial ecosystem. "You sort of feel it," he says. "You hear and see what other people are doing and you get inspired." (Now, he says, he's become part of that ecosystem, "guiding students who want to start a company.")

After their discovery, Chen and Ren launched GMZ out of a garage in Waltham, Mass., with the broad goal of developing and commercializing their materials.

"But we were a little naive," Chen says. "It turns out that because the thermoelectric market is small, there's no big buyer. We realized the materials world wasn't just about materials. It needs a device."

Three years later, they had tangible products to pitch to investors: a device that could draw electricity from solar hot-water collectors and an early version of the current TEG module. They managed to raise $7 million in their first funding round and $18 million a few months later.

But challenges persisted. Because there was no similar product on the market, they went through years of trial and error; deciding on materials, for example, is challenging, because in thermoelectric applications there are many types of materials to use and a variety of heat sources. "The [efficiency] of a material depends on temperature you're facing," Chen explains. "So you have to look at what's the heat source temperature, and what material matches that temperature range."

For their commercial TEG modules, which the company started producing around 2011, GMZ settled on half-Heusler materials, an alloy with a strong crystal structure that allows great stability at high temperatures. But the company has future plans for other materials: bismuth telluride, lead telluride, the mineral skutterudites, and silicon germanium.

Apart from giving the company a boost, the development of TEGs was a means of helping the whole market evolve, Chen says: "Thermoelectrics isn't something you can see. It's not as recognized as a battery or photovoltaic cell. The whole field needs successful products on the market to sustain, inspire, and stimulate innovation. That's really a mission for people working on this."

Ultimately, Chen sees GMZ as a big step toward his goal of helping create a more energy-efficient world. "Most of my research at MIT is about energy," he says. "The motivation for me is really taking this basic research into the real world. I take great pride in that."

Explore further: Solving a mystery of thermoelectrics

More information: gmzenergy.com/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Solving a mystery of thermoelectrics

Apr 29, 2014

Materials that can be used for thermoelectric devices—those that turn a temperature difference into an electric voltage—have been known for decades. But until now there has been no good explanation for ...

Thermoelectric materials can be much more efficient

Mar 25, 2014

Researchers from the University of Twente's MESA+ research institute have managed to significantly improve the efficiency of a thermoelectric material. Because of their unique qualities, these materials can ...

New materials for future green tech devices

Jul 15, 2014

From your hot car to your warm laptop, every machine and device in your life wastes a lot of energy through the loss of heat. But thermoelectric devices, which convert heat to electricity and vice versa, ...

Recommended for you

Preparing for a zero-emission urban bus system

2 hours ago

In order to create a competitive and sustainable transport system, the EU must look to alternative fuels to replace or complement petrol and diesel. Not only will this reduce transport emissions but it will ...

Exploring the value of 'Energy Star' homes

2 hours ago

The numbers in neat columns tell—column by column, page by page—a story spread out across Carmen Carrión-Flores' desk at Binghamton University. It's a great story, she says; she just doesn't know how ...

Toward a networked energy future

Oct 29, 2014

February 1, 2050, is a good day for German electricity consumers. The breeze off the north coast is blowing so strongly that offshore wind farms and the wind turbines on land are running non-stop. Since it's ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

krundoloss
3 / 5 (2) Aug 11, 2014
"Installed near a car's exhaust pipe, for instance, this converted electricity could power the car's electrical components, essentially reducing the load on the vehicle's alternator, reducing fuel costs and overall emissions."

Or we could just replace the Entire Cooling System of the vehicle with Thermoelectrics and capture larger amounts of electricity. If the engine were covered with this stuff, some basic calculations suggest that around 25000 watts could be produced. (surface area = 16000 cm, 1.8 watts per square cm per the article). Would it be more efficient than using a sterling engine to do the same thing? There are obvious applications to Hybrid vehicles to achieve the most benefit.
james_pusateri
5 / 5 (1) Aug 11, 2014
I suspect that coating the block with such a material could have some benefits, but I would think the efficiency loss due to reduced heat dissipation would greatly reduce the life of the motor. As much as that seems like waste, there are some places where the heat would probably just have to be allowed to flow as before.

Perhaps coating the interior of the engine bay rather than the engine itself would be better. Definitely the coolant lines and the entire length of the exhaust system.

I'd like to see it used in building materials as well, completely passive and could reduce heating and cooling needs at the same time.
EyeNStein
5 / 5 (1) Aug 11, 2014
Like the world needs a 1kw more efficient battlefield tank which pushes 60 tons by a 1000kW engine. Its inefficient by design.
Soon to be followed by an M1 Abrams hybrid with solar panels on top.
Mike_Massen
not rated yet Aug 12, 2014
Cost benefit calculation would be essential, if at least to compare using engine waste heat in a Stirling type cycle which feeds an appropriately sized efficient high frequency alternator...
PPihkala
not rated yet Aug 13, 2014
In vehicles one has always the added weight to consider. Second thing is the payback time. So light and inexpensive might work, but not heavy or expensive.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.