Hypersonic weapon detonated after lift-off: US military

Aug 25, 2014
A rendering of a hypersonic vehicle

The US military had to detonate a hypersonic weapon seconds after lift-off Monday due to a technical problem, cutting short a flight test for the experimental project, officials said.

"Less than four seconds into the lift-off phase, we terminated the flight," Pentagon spokeswoman Maureen Schumann told AFP.

The decision to abort the flight test in Alaska was due to a technological "anomaly," she said, without providing more details.

The launch of the "Advanced Hypersonic Weapon" occurred after 4 am local time at the Kodiak Launch Complex in Alaska, Pentagon officials said.

The weapon is part of the Pentagon's "prompt global strike" program designed to build conventional weapons that could take out targets anywhere on the planet within an hour's notice.

"Due to an anomaly, the test was terminated near the launch pad shortly after lift-off to ensure public safety," the Pentagon said in a statement.

There were no injuries in the incident, it said, adding that officials are conducting an "extensive investigation" to determine what went wrong.

A previous flight test for the weapon was carried out in November 2011.

Explore further: Russia reports successful launch of new rocket

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NKorea launch pad expansion 'nearing completion'

Aug 21, 2014

A U.S. research institute says construction to upgrade North Korea's main rocket launch pad should be completed by fall, allowing Pyongyang (pyuhng-yahng) to conduct a launch by year's end if it decides to do so.

SpaceX rocket explodes during test flight

Aug 23, 2014

A SpaceX rocket exploded in midair during a test flight, though no one was injured, as the company seeks to develop a spacecraft that can return to Earth and be used again.

Recommended for you

Cassini sees sunny seas on Titan

11 hours ago

(Phys.org) —As it soared past Saturn's large moon Titan recently, NASA's Cassini spacecraft caught a glimpse of bright sunlight reflecting off hydrocarbon seas.

Is space tourism safe or do civilians risk health effects?

14 hours ago

Several companies are developing spacecraft designed to take ordinary citizens, not astronauts, on short trips into space. "Space tourism" and short periods of weightlessness appear to be safe for most individuals ...

An unmanned rocket exploded. So what?

17 hours ago

Sputnik was launched more than 50 years ago. Since then we have seen missions launched to Mercury, Mars and to all the planets within the solar system. We have sent a dozen men to the moon and many more to ...

NASA image: Sunrise from the International Space Station

18 hours ago

NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman posted this image of a sunrise, captured from the International Space Station, to social media on Oct. 29, 2014. Wiseman wrote, "Not every day is easy. Yesterday was a tough one. ...

Copernicus operations secured until 2021

18 hours ago

In a landmark agreement for Europe's Copernicus programme, the European Commission and ESA have signed an Agreement of over €3 billion to manage and implement the Copernicus 'space component' between 2014 ...

User comments : 15

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ChangBroot
1 / 5 (6) Aug 25, 2014
Since when US military cared about public interest? I seriously doubt that to be the reason for termination.
Psilly_T
1 / 5 (5) Aug 25, 2014
-technological anomaly- I just wanna jump into the sci-fi world and propose hyperactive killer A.I !!!!!! =p j/p
AZWarrior
4 / 5 (2) Aug 25, 2014
The single question that comes to my mind with this delivery system for conventional weapons is how can the Russians or Chinese tell it apart from the launch and flight of a nuclear armed ICBM? Would seem to me to be a pertinent question that needs to be answered before we start tossing these around.
Grallen
5 / 5 (1) Aug 25, 2014
@AZWarrior: I believe it has a different flight trajectory. Though, I suppose they wouldn't be comfortable still since this could probably also carry a nuke.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (2) Aug 25, 2014
Is the headline intentionally misleading?
One interpretation could be the 'weapon' was live and armed and accidentally detonated instead of the flight vehicle 'weapon' being fully instrumented and controllers terminated the flight due to an anomaly, just as Space X did recently.
orti
3 / 5 (2) Aug 25, 2014
Four seconds is a failure of the launch vehicle, not the test vehicle.
eric_in_chicago
not rated yet Aug 26, 2014
how much did it cost?
VlaKas
5 / 5 (1) Aug 26, 2014
Four seconds is a failure of the launch vehicle, not the test vehicle.

The incident is a failure not only of the launch vehicle but also of the whole test(no launch => no success).
Lex Talonis
Aug 26, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
mrmeangenes
5 / 5 (4) Aug 26, 2014
Ah ! The usual critics sound off !!

The little screed by Lex Talonis restores my faith in the belief that which is foul and nasty will generally float to the top.
Doug_Huffman
1 / 5 (2) Aug 26, 2014
... tell it apart from the launch and flight of a ... ICBM?
ICBM = ... Ballistic. Falcon Project (by any other name) is not a ballistic vehicle.

MOLON LABE applies to so much more than merely arms, as Lex obviously knows.
antialias_physorg
1 / 5 (1) Aug 26, 2014
The single question that comes to my mind with this delivery system for conventional weapons is how can the Russians or Chinese tell it apart from the launch and flight of a nuclear armed ICBM?

The nasty thing is that these suborbital, hypervelocity systems aren't covered (read: limited in numbers) by any treaty.

...not that the current 'limit' on ICBMs prevents massive overkill or anything.
Shootist
1 / 5 (2) Aug 26, 2014
how much did it cost?


Cheaper than free healthcare.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (2) Aug 26, 2014
how can the Russians or Chinese tell it apart from the launch and flight of a nuclear armed ICBM?
@AZWarrior
we normally don't let the press know about our ICBM tactical/strategic launches as it would give away the surprise... so the media surrounding the launch as well as the payload would likely be a dead giveaway

we invite the press to watch science missions/launches

I doubt seriously that the gov't would invite the press to a tactical/strategic strike launch... but given some of the other stupid moments in history, I also cannot be sure that they wouldn't
OZGuy
not rated yet Aug 26, 2014
Meanwhile China has been testing their equivalent weapon for some time now.
http://freebeacon...missile/
garygray
not rated yet Sep 01, 2014
Not one objection to the fact that the US/CHINA/RUSSIA govt's are all committing vast financial reserves to this new weapons race whilst employment, environment and the well being of individuals worldwide is declining or being actively suppressed....Humanity deserves the violent and short-lived end that is obviously coming - after all, who let the psychopaths take charge ? oh yes, you and me....

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.