New research debunks the family myth as primary reason for gender gap in politics

Aug 06, 2014

Female candidates for elected office do as well as male candidates in terms of raising money and winning votes, so why do women only occupy 19 percent of congressional seats and approximately 25 percent of statewide offices and hold fewer governorships and mayorships? The traditional wisdom has been family obligations and responsibilities prevent women from running for office.

"But in none of the where scholars attempt to establish a link between roles and political ambition did traditional family arrangements prevent women from eventually running for office," says American University's professor of government and director of the Women & Politics Institute Jennifer Lawless. In her new Brookings Institution report, It's the Family, Stupid? Not Quite. . . How Traditional Gender Roles Do Not Affect Women's Political Ambition, Lawless debunks the widely touted myth that traditional family structures and roles contribute to women's lower political ambition.

Impediments for Women Running for Office

Lawless found in her research that the significant impediments women face are a lack of political recruitment and lower self-perceptions of their qualifications. With Richard Fox (Loyola Marymount University), she conducted a national survey of a random sample of nearly 4,000 equally credentialed men and women who are well positioned to serve as future candidates for all elected office.

The results revealed that women are:

  • less likely than similarly situated men to consider running for elected office,
  • less likely to actually run for office,
  • less likely to receive encouragement to run for office, and
  • less likely to believe they are qualified to seek elective office.

The data revealed a 17 percentage point gender gap in political ambition. "In other words, men are 40 percent more likely than women ever to have considered running for office," says Lawless. "The ambition gap is all the more striking," says Lawless, "given that the women and men in the sample are similarly situated professionally and have comparable educational credentials, incomes, and levels of political interest."

But Lawless' research revealed that women and mothers are no less likely than single women or those without children to have considered running for office. Therefore, childcare, household tasks and other domestic burdens do not serve as the linchpins on whether to run for elected office. What are the key factors preventing women from running for elected office?

Political Gatekeepers

Lawless found political recruitment to be a significant factor. Party leaders, elected officials, and non-elected political activists are far more likely to tap men to run as opposed to women. More specifically, 49 percent of men receive the suggestion to run for office from electoral gatekeepers versus 39 percent of women.

Self-Perception

Self-perception also plays a critical determining factor. Men in the sample were 60 percent more likely than women to consider themselves "very qualified" to seek elected office. Women on the other hand were twice as likely as men to say they are not at all qualified to run for office.

Women Who Run for Office, Manage Work and Family Responsibilities

Women who have bridged the gender gap in winning political office acknowledge the balancing act between career, family, and political ambition. Lawless' national surveys show that, among potential candidates, women are roughly six times more likely than men to bear responsibility for the majority of household tasks and about 10 times more likely than men to be the primary child care provider. "The work-life balance has become such a regular part of their daily routine that women's family dynamics do not discourage them from thinking about or embarking on a political career."

The struggle to balance family roles with professional responsibility has become part of the bargain says Lawless. "Women have substantial professional demands that they must balance with family considerations, but they have become accustomed to doing so."

Further research needs to be done on why women are not more actively recruited to run for political office in addition to what can be done to correct the negative perceptions women have of their qualifications to run for office. Lawless says, "Putting the family myth to bed is an important step to correcting the real reasons for the imbalance in representation of in politics."

Explore further: Men develop breast cancer, too

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Young women do not want to run for office

Mar 26, 2013

Despite some very high-profile female candidates and elected officials, and what looks like a changing landscape of U.S. politics, a new study conducted by American University professor and director of its ...

Women more likely to recruit other women for political office

Aug 08, 2011

The gender composition of those responsible for candidate recruitment plays a crucial role in either encouraging or discouraging women candidates to run for office, according to a recent study in Political Research Quarterly (PRQ) ...

Are women voters more likely to vote for female candidates?

Mar 31, 2008

The research, conducted by University of Wisconsin’s Kathleen Dolan, examined the National Election Study (NES) data, which provided information about voters’ reactions to female candidates and whether gender affinity ...

Men develop breast cancer, too

Jul 08, 2014

(HealthDay)—While rare, breast cancer does occur in men and is often diagnosed at a later age and stage than in women, experts say.

Minority political candidates just need a chance

Feb 11, 2014

It's not necessarily voters who should be blamed for the lack of minorities in state legislatures, but instead the two major political parties for not recruiting enough candidates, indicates new research ...

Recommended for you

Study identifies why re-educating torturers may not work

12 hours ago

Many human rights educators assume – incorrectly, as it turns out – that police and military officers in India who support the torture of suspects do so because they are either immoral or ignorant. This ...

Research helps raise awareness of human trafficking

12 hours ago

Human trafficking –– or the control, ownership and sale of another human being for monetary gain –– was a common occurrence centuries ago, but many believe it doesn't exist in this day and age and not in this country.

User comments : 12

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tadchem
4 / 5 (2) Aug 06, 2014
Genetics has led males to be suited to competition/confrontation. In the reproductive process, once fertilization has occurred they are expendable.
Females are needed for care of dependent offspring. This is even observable in birds, where females are more well camoflaged than males, and less prone to risky behaviors such as baiting possible predators out of concealment near feeding/watering grounds.
cjn
4 / 5 (4) Aug 06, 2014
FTA:
The data revealed a 17 percentage point gender gap in political ambition. "In other words, men are 40 percent more likely than women ever to have considered running for office," says Lawless. "The ambition gap is all the more striking," says Lawless, "given that the women and men in the sample are similarly situated professionally and have comparable educational credentials, incomes, and levels of political interest."

By using "ambition" as the discriminator, this statement assumes that being a politician is something to which we should all aspire; that it is a transcendent occupation. Maybe, it is merely just another occupation to which there are natural social and biological tendencies -like vehicle mechanics or hairdressers.
rockwolf1000
1 / 5 (1) Aug 06, 2014
"Women on the other hand were twice as likely as men to say they are not at all qualified to run for office."

There's your answer right there. If a women doesn't feel she is qualified, why would anyone else?

"10 times more likely than men to be the primary child care provider."

Just as nature intended. Why do you think women have mammary glands?
antigoracle
1 / 5 (3) Aug 07, 2014
Wow. What a "brilliant" response by the Turd Rock from the cesspool.
Hey rockturd, men have mammary glands, but full development is suppressed, very much like what happened to your brain.
Modernmystic
not rated yet Aug 07, 2014
"Women on the other hand were twice as likely as men to say they are not at all qualified to run for office."

There's your answer right there. If a women doesn't feel she is qualified, why would anyone else?

"10 times more likely than men to be the primary child care provider."

Just as nature intended. Why do you think women have mammary glands?


The next time you have a conversation with nature about her intentions please let her know I'm very interested in meeting her. She's as elusive as Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, Unicorns, and Jehovah.

Thanks!
Modernmystic
not rated yet Aug 07, 2014
"Women on the other hand were twice as likely as men to say they are not at all qualified to run for office."

There's your answer right there. If a women doesn't feel she is qualified, why would anyone else?

"10 times more likely than men to be the primary child care provider."

Just as nature intended. Why do you think women have mammary glands?


The next time you have a conversation with nature about her intentions please let her know I'm very interested in meeting her. She's as elusive as Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, Unicorns, and Jehovah.

Thanks!
rockwolf1000
1 / 5 (1) Aug 07, 2014
Wow. What a "brilliant" response by the Turd Rock from the cesspool.
Hey rockturd, men have mammary glands, but full development is suppressed, very much like what happened to your brain.


Not much of a gland if it's non functional is it? Kinda like your brain eh? Non functional.
rockwolf1000
1 / 5 (1) Aug 07, 2014
"Women on the other hand were twice as likely as men to say they are not at all qualified to run for office."

There's your answer right there. If a women doesn't feel she is qualified, why would anyone else?

"10 times more likely than men to be the primary child care provider."

Just as nature intended. Why do you think women have mammary glands?


The next time you have a conversation with nature about her intentions please let her know I'm very interested in meeting her. She's as elusive as Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, Unicorns, and Jehovah.

Thanks!


Why would anyone introduce an idiot like you to anyone else? Talk about embarrassing.

"Hey, you want to meet this total idiot I know? His name is Modernmystic and he thinks the earth can support 20 trillion people with the use of magical technology that hasn't been invented yet."

Double post much?
antigoracle
1 / 5 (2) Aug 07, 2014
Wow. What a "brilliant" response by the Turd Rock from the cesspool.
Hey rockturd, men have mammary glands, but full development is suppressed, very much like what happened to your brain.


Not much of a gland if it's non functional is it? Kinda like your brain eh? Non functional.

Oh, mummy's little turd tried to make a funny, but his tardy brain wouldn't cooperate.
Modernmystic
not rated yet Aug 07, 2014


Why would anyone introduce an idiot like you to anyone else?


This from someone who pretends to visit the intentions of nonexistent entities? Mkay.
rockwolf1000
1 / 5 (1) Aug 07, 2014


Why would anyone introduce an idiot like you to anyone else?


This from someone who pretends to visit the intentions of nonexistent entities? Mkay.


The way Nature intended" is a common figure of speech used quite frequently. That you don't understand that demonstrates your lack of understanding and intelligence.

So how would the earth support 20 trillion people? Do tell.
Modernmystic
not rated yet Aug 08, 2014
The way Nature intended" is a common figure of speech used quite frequently. That you don't understand that demonstrates your lack of understanding and intelligence.


No you weren't using it that way. You were using it in the typically cowardly way to avoid an actual discussion of your values and pretend your values are the correct ones because "nature" agrees with you. Nope you don't get off that easy. You were attempting to dodge using a fictional set of values that agree with your own an pretending that settles everything....which is exactly what religious people do all the time.

I called you on it, you got angry (in your typical immature way). Tough :)

If you MEANT to say the way YOU intend people to behave then SAY it. Nature doesn't INTEND anything....

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.