Dating the sun's prenatal history can help find life on other planets

Aug 11, 2014 by Maria Lugaro & Alexander Heger
How to make a solar system.

Without the sun, there would be no Earth – but amazingly, we don't know the finer details about the prenatal history of our sun, where it was born and if other stars in our galaxy share a similar history.

In a study published last week in Science, we add a couple of pieces to the solar jigsaw and show that two stellar events – a supernova or neutron star merger, plus a dying giant – flung heavy elements into the nursery in which our sun was born, roughly 100 million and 30 million years before the sun's formation.

Research in the prehistory of the sun helps us compare the circumstances of the birth of the sun with those of other stars in our galaxy, setting the existence of the sun, the Earth and humans more firmly within the broader context of the billions of stars and planets (and possibly other lifeforms) that exist in the Milky Way.

It's a matter of time

Recent historical events have been recorded by the writings of historians. Going back further in time, though, we have to rely on other methods to date events.

One of the main tools to achieve this is radioactivity. Radioactive nuclei, by definition, decay as time passes by emitting energetic particles that can be very dangerous to living organisms.

The rate at which they decay is defined by their half-life, which is the time it takes for half of the original nuclei to disappear.

A famous example is carbon-14, which has a half-life of 5,730 years. If the recovered bones of a human contain roughly half the amount of carbon-14 present in the biosphere, that individual must have died 5,730 years ago.

Radioactivity has also allowed us to date the age of the Earth at 4.54 billion years and, via analysis of extra-terrestrial rock samples carried to us via meteoritic falls or space missions, to derive a detailed timing of the events that led to the formation of planets in the .

Using the same techniques, we can also learn something about the major events in the prehistory of the matter in the solar system, such as the period prior to the formation of the sun.

Ingredients for a solar system

Elements in our solar system, except for hydrogen and helium (which were created in the Big Bang), were produced by nuclear reactions in stars.

The material that makes up the solar system was slowly added to by hundreds to thousands of stars as they exploded into supernovas, a process we call "stellar addition".

At some point, this heavier material became isolated inside a star-forming region of the galaxy, where the gas was cooler and denser than the usual galactic gas.

Within this , gas collapsed to form a number of stars, including our sun. By timing the life span of this stellar nursery we can start deducing how massive it was and how many stars were born alongside our sun.

To be able to time the interval that elapsed between the last of the stellar additions and the formation of the sun, we needed to know the how much radioactive nuclei was present at the time of the two events.

Meteoritic analysis provides us these abundances at the formation of the sun. But the abundances in the final stellar addition - and the beginning of the stellar nursery – can only be predicted theoretically by models of nuclear processes in , which aren't well understood.

A long-standing, frustrating problem has been related to the abundances of the iodine-129 and hafnium-182.

Until today, these two nuclei were believed to be produced by the same stellar event, such as a supernova or a neutron star merger, in a process that produces heavy elements including gold and lead.

Trying to date this last stellar addition, though, produced two completely inconsistent timings: roughly 45 or 90 million years using hafnium-182 or iodine-129, respectively.

The main result of our study published today is that these two nuclei were instead produced by two different types of events: iodine-129 was still produced with gold by a supernova or a neutron star merger, but hafnium-182 was instead produced with lead by a dying giant star.

The stellar addition from this last giant star happened at most 30 million years before the formation of the sun.

This dating provides us with an upper limit for the life span of the stellar nursery where the sun was born, which will allow us to know more intimately the parent stellar nursery of our sun – and the 's "siblings" which may harbour solar systems similar to ours.

Explore further: Step closer to birth of the Sun

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Solar System genealogy revealed by meteorites

Aug 29, 2012

(Phys.org)—The stellar environment of our Solar System at its birth is poorly known, as it has accomplished some twenty revolutions around the Galactic centre since its formation 4.5 billion years ago. ...

Young sun's violent history solves meteorite mystery

Jul 01, 2014

(Phys.org) —Astronomers using ESA's Herschel space observatory to probe the turbulent beginnings of a Sun-like star have found evidence of mighty stellar winds that could solve a puzzling meteorite mystery ...

Is our solar system weird?

Jul 18, 2014

Is our Solar System normal? Or is it weird? How does the Solar System fit within the strange star systems we've discovered in the Milky Way so far?

How do you jumpstart a dead star?

Mar 14, 2014

It's a staple of science fiction, restarting our dying star with some kind of atomic superbomb. Why is our sun running out of fuel, and what can we actually do to get it restarted?

Recommended for you

Big black holes can block new stars

44 minutes ago

Massive black holes spewing out radio-frequency-emitting particles at near-light speed can block formation of new stars in aging galaxies, a study has found.

POLARBEAR seeks cosmic answers in microwave polarization

55 minutes ago

An international team of physicists has measured a subtle characteristic in the polarization of the cosmic microwave background radiation that will allow them to map the large-scale structure of the universe, ...

New radio telescope ready to probe

3 hours ago

Whirring back and forth on a turning turret, the white, 40-foot dish evokes the aura of movies such as "Golden Eye" or "Contact," but the University of Arizona team of scientists and engineers that commissioned ...

Exomoons Could Be Abundant Sources Of Habitability

Oct 20, 2014

With about 4,000 planet candidates from the Kepler Space Telescope data to analyze so far, astronomers are busy trying to figure out questions about habitability. What size planet could host life? How far ...

Partial solar eclipse over the U.S. on Thursday, Oct. 23

Oct 17, 2014

People in most of the continental United States will be in the shadow of the Moon on Thursday afternoon, Oct. 23, as a partial solar eclipse sweeps across the Earth. For people looking through sun-safe filters, from Los Angeles, ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
not rated yet Aug 11, 2014
This two stage process bears a resemblance to the element injection models where first a generation of supernova stars seed the "grandparent" cluster (with Fe-60, so Au, Ag, but apparently also I-129) and second generation of massive stars seed the "parent" cluster shell (with Al-26, but apparently also REE and Hf-182).

These models do seem robust to variations of say delay times, due to the uncoupling of the seed stages of elements by the star generations. I.e. the suggested 10 million years delay could very well be 70 millions. [ http://arxiv.org/...79v1.pdf ]