Do women talk more than men? It depends

July 16, 2014 by Angela Herring
Professor David Lazer’s research is focused on using technology to study social interactions on a large scale. Credit: Brooks Canaday.

We've all heard the stereotype: Women like to talk. We bounce ideas off each other about everything from career moves to dinner plans. We hash out big decisions through our conversations with one another and work through our emotions with discussion.

At least, that's what "they" say. But is any of it actually true? A new study from Northeastern University professor David Lazer's lab says it isn't that simple.

Lazer, who researches social networks and holds joint appointments in the Department of Political Science and the College of Computer and Information Sciences, took a different approach. Using so-called "sociometers" – wearable devices roughly the size of smartphones – the researchers collected real-time data about the user's social interactions. Lazer's team was able to tease out a more accurate picture of the talkative-woman stereotype we're so familiar with—and they found that context plays a large role.

But can we really make such sweeping generalizations about the communication patterns of women versus those of men? The research is surprisingly thin considering the strength of the stereotype: Some studies say yes, women are more talkative than men. Others say there's no pattern at all. Still others say men are even bigger chatterboxes.

Perhaps all this contradiction comes from the difficulty of studying such a phenomenon. Most of these studies rely on either self-​​reported data, in which researchers gather information by asking subjects about their past conversational exploits, or observational data, in which researchers watch the interactions directly. But both of these approaches bring with them some hefty limitations. For one thing, our memories are not nearly as good as we like to think they are. Secondly, researchers can only observe so many people at once, meaning large data sets, which offer the most statistical power to detect differences, are hard to come by. Another challenge with direct observation is that subjects may act in a more affiliative manner in front of a researcher.

The research was published Tuesday in the journal Scientific Reports and represents one of the first academic papers to use sociometers to address this kind of question. The research team includes Jukka-Pekka Onnela, who previously worked in Lazer's lab and is now at the Harvard School of Public Health, as well as researchers at the MIT Media Laboratory and the Harvard Kennedy School.

For their study, Lazer's research team provided a group of men and women with sociometers and split them in two different social settings for a total of 12 hours. In the first setting, master's degree candidates were asked to complete an individual project, about which they were free to converse with one another for the duration of a 12-hour day. In the second setting, employees at a call-center in a major U.S. banking firm wore the sociometers during 12 one-hour lunch breaks with no designated task.

"In the one setting that is more collaborative we see the women choosing to work together, and when you work together you tend to talk more," said Lazer, who is also co-director of the NULab for Texts, Maps, and Networks, Northeastern's research-based center for digital humanities and computational social science. "So it's a very particular scenario that leads to more interactions. The real story here is there's an interplay between the setting and gender which created this difference."

Explore further: How men and women organize their (online) social networks differently

More information: Scientific Reports,

Related Stories

'Trophy wife' stereotype is largely a myth, new study shows

June 17, 2014

Don't be so quick to judge. Most people are familiar with the "trophy wife" stereotype that attractive women marry rich men, placing little importance on their other traits, including physical appearance, and that men look ...

Recommended for you

Biologists trace how human innovation impacts tool evolution

November 24, 2015

Many animals exhibit learned behaviors, but humans are unique in their capacity to build on existing knowledge to make new innovations. Understanding the patterns of how new generations of tools emerged in prehistoric societies, ...

How experienced buyers can mitigate economic bubbles

November 19, 2015

(—Over the last decade, many people got a tough primer on the effects of economic bubbles, as the bursting of the 2007-2008 housing bubble sent shockwaves through most of the major world economies. But property ...

First Londoners were multi-ethnic mix: museum

November 23, 2015

A DNA analysis of four ancient Roman skeletons found in London shows the first inhabitants of the city were a multi-ethnic mix similar to contemporary Londoners, the Museum of London said on Monday.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lex Talonis
2.8 / 5 (6) Jul 16, 2014
Women tend to talk mostly shit though.

Their brains - like their mapping skills, is next to zero.

So while they can focus on one town on one map, they are incapable of grasping the big picture and working with that.

Just because they talk heaps, does not mean they are actually saying anything useful.

That is why they need to be told, "Back in the kitchen bitch - and make me a sammich."
3 / 5 (2) Jul 16, 2014
Yes they do, and some might say, a little too much!!
2 / 5 (1) Jul 16, 2014
Please, women talk about what they like to talk about and men talk about what they like. Men talk more about substance, women talk about anything but. We have less to talk about but are probably just as talkative when we have something to talk about. It's just that there is so much substanceless stuff to talk about that it seems like women talk more, much, much more.
not rated yet Jul 16, 2014
Extremely limited to the point of being ungeneralisable.

Check the length of the average phone conversation...that may be a better measure.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.