Why do challenging tasks make consumers believe drugs wear off faster?

Jul 22, 2014

Imagine that you have a cup of coffee and sit down to read People magazine. How long do you think the energy boost will last before you reach for another cup? Would you need more caffeine if you tried to read War and Peace? A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research finds that consumers wrongly believe that pharmacological products such as coffee and aspirin lose their effectiveness when they engage in more strenuous activities.

"People make assumptions about how long it takes for to wear off. For example, they know that cars burn gasoline more quickly when driving uphill than downhill and difficult workouts burn calories more quickly than easy workouts," write authors Veronika Ilyuk, Lauren Block (both Baruch College, City University of New York), and David Faro (London Business School).

However, when it comes to products like and over-the-counter medications, consumers seem to be inappropriately generalizing about how long it takes for the effects of these products to wear off. Over five studies, the authors studied what they term the "rapid wear-off bias" as it relates to a person's perceived duration of a product's effectiveness.

In one study, participants were assigned a reading task and were asked to consume an energizing jellybean when they believed the effects of the previous one were wearing off. Some participants were given passages in a standard font (easy condition) and others were given passages in a light gray, italicized font, with shadowing in the middle of the page (difficult condition). Participants who read the dificult passage consumed jellybeans more frequently than those reading the easy passage.

Brands marketing pharmacological products can use these results to evaluate the intake instructions on their product packaging and help avoid accidental overdoses and other detrimental health-related outcomes. "Interestingly, we found that task difficulty does not affect a person's perception of how effective a product is in general. Rather, it uniquely affects judgments of consumption frequency," the authors conclude.

Explore further: Making information hard to read can have benefits

More information: Veronika Ilyuk, Lauren Block, and David Faro. "Is It Still Working? Task Difficulty Promotes a Rapid Wear-Off Bias in Judgments of Pharmacological Products." Journal of Consumer Research: October 2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Making information hard to read can have benefits

Nov 12, 2013

(Phys.org) —Making consumers exert more effort to buy something—through midnight releases, for example, or long waits outside the store—has been a successful marketing strategy for companies seeking ...

Double standard? The use of performance-enhancing products

Jun 25, 2014

When professional athletes are found to be using performance-enhancing drugs, many people consider this an unfair advantage and say they are cheating. But when another person uses the same drug to overcome a disease or behavioral ...

Online reviews: When do negative opinions boost sales?

Apr 15, 2014

When purchasing items online, reading customer reviews is a convenient way to get a real-world account of other people's opinions of the product. According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, negative review ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

AJW
not rated yet Jul 22, 2014
frustration => eating
A_Paradox
4 / 5 (1) Jul 23, 2014
It puzzles me that there is no attempt at inferring causation here, or any deeper consideration of the mechanism involved. My guess is that dopamine is involved, ie whatever buzz the test subjects got from the pills or lollies entailed a reward component. I think this would have an outcome of 'needing more for the same buzz'.