Money talks when it comes to acceptability of 'sin' companies, study reveals

Jul 30, 2014

Companies who make their money in the "sin" industries such as the tobacco, alcohol and gaming industries typically receive less attention from institutional investors and financial analysts.

But new research shows and attitudes towards these types of businesses are subject to compromise when their share price looks to be on the rise. A paper from the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management found that institutional shareholdings and analysts' coverage of sin firms were low when firm performance was low but went up with rising performance expectations.

That suggests that market participants may ignore social norms and standards with the right financial reward.

"This is a way to test the trade-off between people's non-financial and financial incentives. The boundary of people's social norms is not a constant," said researcher Hai Lu, an associate professor of accounting at the Rotman School. Prof. Lu co-wrote the paper with two former Rotman PhD students, McMaster University's Kevin Veenstra and Yanju Liu, now with Singapore Management University.

The paper sheds light on why there can be a disconnect between the investment behaviour of Wall St. and the ethical expectations of ordinary people. It also suggests a worrisome implication that compromising one's ethical values in the face of high financial rewards can become a social norm in itself.

On the brighter side, the also finds that strong social norms still have an influence over people's behaviour. If social norms are strong enough and the price of ignoring them is high, this may act as a disincentive to disregard them in favour of other benefits.

This is the first study to examine whether the social acceptability of sin stocks can vary with financial performance. The researchers compared consumption and attitudinal data with information on sin firm stocks, analysts' coverage and levels of institutional investment.

Explore further: Sell-side analysts lean towards high valuation companies for comparison, study shows

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Religion is good for business, study shows

Dec 20, 2013

Those looking for honest companies to invest in might want to check out businesses based in more religious communities, suggests a new paper from the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.

Recommended for you

Industrial clusters fuel economies, according to study

3 hours ago

Experts have long theorized that having a cluster of firms within a given industry helps a region's economy grow. Now a study co-authored by an MIT professor shows empirically that clusters of almost all ...

Economic output less dependent on road transportation

3 hours ago

For the past 10 years, motorization in the U.S. has been on the decline, due mainly to more telecommuting, greater use of public transit, increased urbanization of the population and changes in the ages of drivers.

Economist outlines work on managing tasks and time

Dec 17, 2014

"When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight," said Samuel Johnson, "it concentrates his mind wonderfully." Most of us, spared such an imperative, carry on in a less-concentrated state, but it holds ...

Companies do not use online HRM effectively

Dec 15, 2014

Professor Tanya Bondarouk of the University of Twente thinks it's embarrassing : many companies and organizations are still not making effective use of e-HRM systems. These online systems can be used for a wide range of HRM-related ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Jul 30, 2014
Companies who make their money in the "sin" industries such as the tobacco, alcohol and gaming industries

Hmmm...first thing that came to my mind would have been the military industrial complex...silly me.
I mean...the first one of the big 10 sins isn't "do not smoke", is it?
kochevnik
1 / 5 (1) Jul 30, 2014
Wonderful example right here on physorg. I point out that BP was created in the aftermath of US/UK collusion employing the CIA in project AJAX. This is documented, historic fact. Yet somehow I'm the loon for reciting world history and the post is deleted after being earmarked by vested interests

Not to single out physorg. Small outlets are simply carried along as kleptocrats unravel the economic tapestry to line their own pockets, and their "perception management" aka propaganda teams include power players

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.