Researcher gauges species' evolutionary lag time in face of an altered climate

Jul 15, 2014 by Brendan M. Lynch

Either change or disappear. A great many of Earth's creatures already have come to this crossroads, or soon will, driven by a rapidly shifting natural environment tied to global climate change. But how quickly can species evolve to cope with dire threats such as new pathogens, competing species and harsher climactic conditions?

A recent $150,000 grant from the National Science Foundation will enable scientists at the University of Kansas to better answer this question in hopes of guiding conservation efforts and shedding light on how organisms evolve.

"We would be interested in these questions no matter how we think the future climate might change," said Maria Orive, associate professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at KU. "We know that climate and are always changing, and so adapting to change is always something that need to do. But many of the current climate models predict very rapid change, and that's especially interesting, because evolution and adaptation take time, and so the faster the environment changes, the faster a needs to adapt."

Scientists already know that a key for rapid adaptation to the environment is generation time—the period it takes for an organism to go from one generation to the next.

"Generation times vary a great deal," Orive said. "A human generation time is about 20 years, the generation time for a fruit fly is about 10 days, and for a bacterial species, the generation time can be about 20 minutes. For the types of plants and we are focusing on in this study, a generation time can be as long as 10 to 100 years. The longer the generation time, the slower the evolutionary rate."

But other factors influence the period it takes for species to adapt to the rigors of : "A few important ones include the size of the population, the amount of genetic variability in the population, and the degree of environmental variability," Orive said.

When species can't develop new traits to keep pace with the demands of their environment, they suffer from "evolutionary lag," according to the KU researcher.

"'Evolutionary lag' most commonly refers to the difference between the optimum for a trait—the best possible version of that trait in a particular environment—and the average for that trait in the current population. It is a measure of how far from the optimum the population currently finds itself."

When an organism's physical or biochemical traits are ill suited to its environment the species is said to show "maladaptation"—a reduced ability to survive or reproduce, or both.

In addition to evolving in response to a changing environment, organisms with identical genetic codes could possess different sets of traits that emerge under different environmental conditions, a phenomenon dubbed "phenotypic plasticity."

"You might imagine two plants that have the same genetic makeup, so they have no genetic differences, but that are raised in two different environments, maybe low levels of light and high levels of light," said Orive. "If their final phenotype is different—the final height of the plant, or the distance between sets of leaves—the plants are showing phenotypic plasticity. This can be important, because it gives a population another way to respond to a changing environment."

Another way organisms might adjust to rapidly changing climactic conditions is by dispersal, or moving to a new location.

"You can imagine the dispersal of seeds from a plant, so that the offspring of the plant are found at some distance from the parent," Orive said. "If the population is able to disperse far enough so that the organisms are in a new environment, they can escape an environment that has changed for the worse in this way, rather than adapting to the changed environment."

Orive is especially interested in determining how sexual and asexual reproduction and "clonal lineages"—genetically identical organisms descended from one common ancestor—play a part in the speed of species' evolutionary speed.

"The types of organisms that my theoretical models are considering include some very ecologically important organisms, such as reef-building corals, many important marine invertebrates, and many important plant species, including tree species," said Orive. "All of these organisms show both sexual and clonal reproduction, yet we have very little understanding of how clonal reproduction may affect their ability to deal with changing environments."

Using mathematics, statistics and computer science in her research, Orive hopes to develop models that deepen our insight into the workings of evolution and extinction. Also, the work will educate graduate and undergraduate students at the boundary of biology and math, and involve traditionally underrepresented groups in these disciplines. Moreover, Orive will develop a video on the interface of biology and mathematics aimed at students.

Explore further: Mathematically modeling species dispersal

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mathematically modeling species dispersal

Jul 03, 2014

Dispersal is an ecological process involving the movement of an organism or multiple organisms away from their birth site to another location or population where they settle and reproduce. An important topic in ecology and ...

Birds outpace climate change to avoid extinction

Jul 09, 2013

A new study has shed light on the potential of birds to survive in the face of climate change. In the analysis, based on more than fifty years' detailed study of a population of great tits near Oxford, UK, a team of scientists ...

Genetic mix could benefit colonising plants and animals

May 01, 2014

(Phys.org) —Recently evaluated evidence suggests that organisms bred from different genetic lines have evolutionary advantages over more closely related members of the same species when colonising new environments.

Rapid evolution aids spread of exotic plant species

May 23, 2014

A team of Belgian biologists led by researchers at KU Leuven has provided the first genetic evidence that rapid evolution can help non-native plant species spread in new environments. Using samples of centuries-old ...

Evolutionary benefits of sex in difficult places

Jun 14, 2012

(Phys.org) -- University of Auckland scientists have provided the first experimental explanation of how sexual reproduction helps species adapt in challenging real-world environments, solving a classic conundrum in evolutionary ...

Recommended for you

Invasive lionfish likely safe to eat after all

7 hours ago

Scientists have learned that recent fears of invasive lionfish causing fish poisoning may be unfounded. If so, current efforts to control lionfish by fishing derbies and targeted fisheries may remain the ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JVK
1 / 5 (1) Jul 15, 2014
Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations: from atoms to ecosystems

"...a biophysically constrained, nutrient-dependent, epigenetically-effected, receptor-mediated recognizable organized pattern of emergence can be viewed in the context of ecological variations and ecological adaptations."

http://figshare.c...s/994281

Cell type differentiation in all individuals of all species is nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled. It is not possible to accurately model biologically-based cause and effect using mathematics, statistics and computer science. Models that deepen our insight into the workings of ecological adaptations vs extinction must include what's known about physics, chemistry, and conserved molecular mechanisms. They cannot be based on evolutionary theories.
JVK
1 / 5 (1) Jul 15, 2014
Altered climate is the ecological variation that leads to ecological adaptations, not to mutation-initiated natural selection. "Chemical ecology drives adaptive evolution via 1) ecological niche construction, 2) social niche construction, 3) neurogenic niche construction, and 4) socio-cognitive niche construction (Kohl, 2012). Nutrients are metabolized to pheromones that condition effects on hormones that affect behavior in the same way that food odors condition behavior associated with food preferences. For example: glucose (Roland and Moenter, 2011) and pheromones alter the secretion of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Across species comparisons of epigenetic effects on genetically predisposed nutrient-dependent and hormone-driven invertebrate and vertebrate social and sexual behavior indicate that human pheromones alter the development of the brain and behavior via the same molecular mechanisms..." http://youtu.be/DbH_Rj9U524