50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet installed at Fermilab

Jul 31, 2014 by Andre Salles
The 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet at rest inside the Fermilab building that will house the experiment. The magnet was moved into the new building on Wednesday, July 30, 2014. The magnet will allow scientists to precisely probe the properties of subatomic particles called muons. Credit: Fermilab.

One year ago, the 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet arrived at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois after traveling 3,200 miles over land and sea from Long Island, New York. This week, the magnet took the final few steps of that journey, moving across the Fermilab site and into the new building that now houses it.

The gigantic electromagnet is the centerpiece of Fermilab's Muon g-2 experiment, which will investigate the properties of an elusive subatomic particle called the muon. Since its arrival at Fermilab on July 26, 2013, the magnet has been biding its time, waiting for the completion of the new building on site that will house the experiment.

That building was finished in April, and in a series of two moves over the past six days, the ring was transported across the Fermilab site and slowly pulled into place on huge metal tracks. A crowd of scientists and enthusiasts were on hand to cheer the magnet on, and applaud the next phase of muon physics at Fermilab.

"We're all very excited to see this device move that last mile and be put in place," said Chris Polly, project manager for the Muon g-2 experiment. "For those of us who have been working on this for years, it's a great moment, and it brings us closer to taking data and having our questions answered."

Muons are heavy cousins of electrons. The experiment will be used to study muons created in Fermilab's particle accelerators. Muons "wobble" when placed in a magnetic field, and based on what we know about the universe, scientists have predicted the ultra-precise value of that wobble. The predecessor experiment using this magnet at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York in the 1990s saw evidence for – though not definitive proof of – a departure from that expected value.

Workers slowly slide the 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet inside the new building on the Fermilab site that will house the experiment. The magnet was moved into the building on Wednesday, July 30, 2014, while a crowd of scientists and onlookers watched. Credit: Fermilab.

Scientists think that this deviation might be due to the presence of heavy, undiscovered particles or hidden subatomic forces.

Fermilab's accelerator complex can generate a more intense and pure beam of muons, so the new experiment should be able to provide a definitive answer. Should the Muon g-2 experiment also see a deviation from the expected value, it could open the door to new mysteries of the universe.

The electromagnet was specifically designed for muon experiments like this one. To build a new one at Fermilab would have cost about $30 million, but transporting the ring from New York cost only $3 million.

"The arrival of the magnet one year ago, and the move to the newly completed building this week, are both testaments to the years of planning and work by the entire collaboration," said David Hertzog, co-spokesperson for the Muon g-2 experiment. "It's an important milestone, and cause for celebration."

Exactly one year to the day after completing a 3,200-mile journey from Long Island, the 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet was moved across the Fermilab site on Saturday, July 26 to the new building that will house the experiment. Credit: Fermilab.

Once the ring is in place, it will take several months to set up the detectors for the experiment. Following that, the magnet will need to be shimmed to ensure the most precise measurement possible, and that process could take upwards of a year. The experiment is expected to start taking data in 2017.

Muon g-2 is the first of two muon experiments planned for Fermilab, both of which will enhance our knowledge about these fundamental particles. Both the Muon g-2 and the Muon-to-Electron (Mu2e) experiments were specifically recommended by the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel in its recent report, a document that serves as a road map for U.S. particle physics for the next 20 years. The P5 report was approved by the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel, which advises both the DOE and the National Science Foundation.

Explore further: Massive 30-ton MicroBooNE particle detector moved into place, will see neutrinos this year

Related Stories

Fermilab experiment weighs in on neutrino mystery

Jun 24, 2011

Scientists of the MINOS experiment at the Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory announced today (June 24) the results from a search for a rare phenomenon, the transformation of muon ...

Recommended for you

European physicist discusses Higgs boson at Brown University

14 hours ago

The head of the European Organization for Nuclear Research says the historic 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson particle and the particle accelerator that detected it are getting scientists closer to understanding the creation ...

Boron-based atomic clusters mimic rare-earth metals

Apr 17, 2015

Rare Earth elements, found in the f-block of the periodic table, have particular magnetic and optical properties that make them valuable commodities. This has been particularly true over the last thirty years ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Aug 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet Aug 02, 2014
PhysOrg needs to do a reality check. Virtually Everyone even remotely interested in this story does not need to be told the magnet's diameter in "feet", they all are conversant in the metric system, & probably feel as I do, that this story was written for American hicks who can only comprehend measurements in ft., in., lbs, miles, ad nauseam. Please do us a favor & insist on using scientific units to report scientific news to mostly scientifically conversant people.
Thanks !
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Aug 02, 2014
that this story was written for American hicks
1- American company
2- likely targeting American public primarily
3- this is a POP-SCI site... not a journal of science. This contains articles and information to get people interested and wanting to be involved with science, not a specific single source news outlet that all scientists use for studies and impact.

Perhaps there are a great number of people here that are not American, and/or actually know the metric system, however the BULK of the readers are likely just normal people passing thru or posting articles which they read only partially anyway while on Facebook.

your righteous indignation is noted, but wrongfully applied. Were this AAAS Science Magazine, then you would have a legitimate gripe, but you are essentially complaining about nothing... very much like an American complaining about British (the Queen's English) spelling in a local London newspaper.

5 / 5 (2) Aug 02, 2014
PhysOrg needs to do a reality check.
I wonder who needs a reality check?... I just think it is fair to fit the convenience of the main readership. https://www.quant...ountries By the way, I am Canadian, we have made the transition to metric over forty years ago, so It is not a partisan position that I am defending.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.