Searching for Earth-like planets: Newly spotted frozen world orbits in a binary star system

Jul 03, 2014 by Pam Frost Gorder
This artist's rendering shows a newly discovered planet (far right) orbiting one star (right) of a binary star system. The discovery, made by a collaboration of international research teams and led by researchers at The Ohio State University, expands astronomers' notions of where to look for planets in our galaxy. Credit: Cheongho Han, Chungbuk National University, Republic of Korea.

A newly discovered planet in a binary star system located 3,000 light-years from Earth is expanding astronomers' notions of where Earth-like—and even potentially habitable—planets can form, and how to find them.

At twice the mass of Earth, the planet orbits one of the in the binary system at almost exactly the same distance from which Earth orbits the sun. However, because the planet's is much dimmer than the sun, the planet is much colder than the Earth—a little colder, in fact, than Jupiter's icy moon Europa.

Four international research teams, led by professor Andrew Gould of The Ohio State University, published their discovery in the July 4 issue of the journal Science.

The study provides the first evidence that terrestrial planets can form in orbits similar to Earth's, even in a system where the stars are not very far apart. Although this planet itself is too cold to be habitable, the same planet orbiting a sun-like star in such a binary system would be in the so-called "habitable zone" —the region where conditions might be right for life.

"This greatly expands the potential locations to discover habitable planets in the future," said Scott Gaudi, professor of astronomy at Ohio State. "Half the stars in the galaxy are in binary systems. We had no idea if Earth-like planets in Earth-like orbits could even form in these systems. "

Very rarely, the gravity of a star focuses the light from a more distant star and magnifies it like a lens. Even more rarely, the signature of a planet appears within that magnified . The technique astronomers use to find such planets is called gravitational microlensing, and computer modeling of these events is complicated enough when only one star and its planet are acting as the lens, much less two stars.

Searching for planets within binary systems is tricky for most techniques, because the light from the second star complicates the interpretation of the data. "But in gravitational microlensing," Gould explained, "we don't even look at the light from the star-planet system. We just observe how its gravity affects light from a more distant, unrelated, star. This gives us a new tool to search for planets in ."

When the astronomers succeeded in detecting this new planet, they were able to document that it produced two separate signatures—the primary one, which they typically use to detect planets, and a secondary one that had previously been only hypothesized to exist.

The first was a brief dimming of light, as the planet's gravity disrupted one of the magnified images of the source star. But the second effect was an overall distortion of the light signal.

"Even if we hadn't seen the initial signature of the planet, we could still have detected it from the distortion alone," Gould said, pointing to a graph of the light signal. "The effect is not obvious. You can't see it by eye, but the signal is unmistakable in the computer modeling."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
This artist's rendering depicts a newly discovered frozen planet orbiting one star of a binary star system 3,000 light-years from Earth, and shows what the two dim stars in the binary system might look like from the view of the planet. The discovery, made by a collaboration of international research teams and led by researchers at The Ohio State University, expands astronomers' notions of where to look for planets in our galaxy. Credit: Cheongho Han, Chungbuk National University, Republic of Korea.

Gaudi explained the implications.

"Now we know that with gravitational microlensing, it's actually possible to infer the existence of a planet—and to know its mass, and its distance from a star—without directly detecting the dimming due to the planet," he said. "We thought we could do that in principle, but now that we have empirical evidence, we can use this method to find planets in the future."

The nature of these distortions is still somewhat of a mystery, he admitted.

"We don't have an intuitive understanding of why it works. We have some idea, but at this point, I think it would be fair to say that it's at the frontier of our theoretical work."

The planet, called OGLE-2013-BLG-0341LBb, first appeared as a "dip" in the line tracing the brightness data taken by the OGLE (Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment) telescope on April 11, 2013. The planet briefly disrupted one of the images formed by the star it orbits as the system crossed in front of a much more 20,000 light-years away in the constellation Sagittarius.

"Before the dip, this was just another microlensing event," Gould said. It was one of approximately 2,000 discovered every year by OGLE, with its new large-format camera that monitors 100 million stars many times per night searching for such events.

"It's really the new OGLE-IV survey that made this discovery possible," he added. "They got a half dozen measurements of that dip and really nailed it." From the form of the dip, whose "wings" were traced out in MOA (Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics) data, they could see that the source was headed directly toward the central star.

Then, for two weeks, astronomers watched the magnified light continue to brighten from telescopes in Chile, New Zealand, Israel and Australia. The teams included OGLE, MOA, MicroFUN (the Microlensing Follow Up Network), and the Wise Observatory.

Even then, they still didn't know that the planet's host star had another companion—a second star locked into orbit with it. But because they were already paying close attention to the signal, the astronomers noticed when the unexpectedly caused a huge eruption of light called a caustic crossing.

By the time they realized that the lens was not one star, but two, they had captured a considerable amount of data—and made a surprising discovery: the distortion.

Weeks after all signs of the planet had faded, the light from the binary-lens caustic crossing became distorted, as if there were a kind of echo of the original planet signal.

Intensive computer analysis by professor Cheongho Han at Chungbuk National University in Korea revealed that the distortion contained information about the planet—its mass, separation from its star, and orientation—and that information matched perfectly with what astronomers saw during their direct observation of the dip due to the planet. So the same information can be captured from the distortion alone.

This detailed analysis showed that the planet is twice the mass of Earth, and orbits its star from an Earth-like distance, around 90 million miles. But its star is 400 times dimmer than our sun, so the planet is very cold—around 60 Kelvin (-352 degrees Fahrenheit or -213 Celsius), which makes it a little colder than Jupiter's moon Europa. The second star in the star system is only as far from the first star as Saturn is from our sun. But this binary companion, too, is very dim.

Still, binary star systems composed of dim stars like these are the most common type of in our galaxy, the astronomers said. So this discovery suggests that there may be many more out there—some possibly warmer, and possibly harboring life.

Three other have been discovered in binary systems that have similar separations, but using a different technique. This is the first one close to Earth-like size that follows an Earth-like orbit, and its discovery within a binary system by was by chance.

"Normally, once we see that we have a binary, we stop observing. The only reason we took such intensive observations of this binary is that we already knew there was a planet," Gould said. "In the future we'll change our strategy."

In particular, Gould singled out the work of amateur astronomer and frequent collaborator Ian Porritt of Palmerston North, New Zealand, who watched for gaps in the clouds on the night of April 24 to get the first few critical measurements of the jump in the light signal that revealed that the planet was in a . Six other amateurs from New Zealand and Australia contributed as well.

Explore further: Astronomers discover first self-lensing binary star system

More information: A terrestrial planet in a ~1-AU orbit around one member of a ~15-AU binary," A. Gould et al. Science, 2014. www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/… 1126/science.1251527

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Astronomers discover new planet in Pisces constellation

Jan 09, 2014

A team led by SF State astronomer Stephen Kane has discovered a new giant planet located in a star system within the Pisces constellation. The planet, perhaps twice the mass of Jupiter, could help researchers ...

Recommended for you

Image: Hubble captures the Egg Nebula

8 minutes ago

This colourful image shows a cosmic lighthouse known as the Egg Nebula, which lies around 3000 light-years from Earth. The image, taken with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, has captured a brief but dramatic ...

'Blockbuster' science images

Nov 21, 2014

At this point, the blockbuster movie Interstellar has created such a stir that one would almost have to be inside a black hole not to know about it. And while the science fiction thriller may have taken some ...

Estimating the magnetic field of an exoplanet

Nov 20, 2014

Scientists developed a new method which allows to estimate the magnetic field of a distant exoplanet, i.e., a planet, which is located outside the Solar system and orbits a different star. Moreover, they ...

It's filamentary: How galaxies evolve in the cosmic web

Nov 20, 2014

How do galaxies like our Milky Way form, and just how do they evolve? Are galaxies affected by their surrounding environment? An international team of researchers, led by astronomers at the University of ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

someone11235813
5 / 5 (2) Jul 03, 2014
Seeing as the term 'Earth-like planet' has become common, it's about time that there was a proper recognised definition as to what exactly this nebulous term refers to. It must be incredibly confusing to the lay person who has only a passing interest in science and takes the term in a much more literal sense than is reasonable.

Earth-like, seems to be anything from 'spherical shaped' or 'in the "habitable" zone', to whatever ...
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (4) Jul 03, 2014
Earth-like is Earth-massed (1-4 Earth masses, so not an ice giant neptune) in the habitable zone. Earth analog would be Earth-like around a Sun-like star (G type).

Those are only pointers, akin to how habitable zone definitions filters out potential habitables. I expect a lot of systematization will be done.

On the other hand the term "life" has become common, at least in the last few millenniums I think, and it's about time that there was a proper recognized definition as to what exactly this nebulous term refers to. Alas, ...
Lex Talonis
1.8 / 5 (5) Jul 03, 2014
It's a pointless kind of an article.

In geological terms and considering the technological rarity of our time.... this is like looking for fly shit in 10,000 year old buildings.....

Without any safe, fast way to get there... it's sort of more or less pointless just to sit there racking up sets of data, that at the end of the day - it's just a print out.

It's utterly pointless to say "We have records of 20,000 habital planets - and they are on average - only 1000 light years away...."

Well so what?
JohanVDMeer
1 / 5 (1) Jul 07, 2014
"The study provides the first evidence that terrestrial planets can form in orbits similar to Earth's, even in a binary star system "
I think the researcher should rather use the words "can be found" instead of the indicated "can form" as used in this sentence.
So far it's not been proven to be a fact that planets can form all be themselves from the accretion of dust around a star.
So the best description for the observation is that the planet was discovered or FOUND.

Uncle Ira
not rated yet Jul 07, 2014
"The study provides the first evidence that terrestrial planets can form in orbits similar to Earth's, even in a binary star system "
I think the researcher should rather use the words "can be found" instead of the indicated "can form" as used in this sentence.
So far it's not been proven to be a fact that planets can form all be themselves from the accretion of dust around a star.
So the best description for the observation is that the planet was discovered or FOUND.



Okayeei Skippy, ask and you shall receive. You get your very own silly looking pointy cap to wear at the physorg. On your second day, that might be a record. The Returnering-Skippy had the record before you, he got his silly looking pointy cap on his third day.
JohanVDMeer
not rated yet Jul 08, 2014
Actually Ira, It's sad to say but you're ignoring simple physics. Perhaps you'd like to show some documented, real life observation that shows planets actually forming all by themselves via the accretion process from dust surrounding a star.

Unless and until such observation can be produced, the accretion theory simply a wild hypothesis, and not even a good one at that since it defies plain, simple principles of physics.

You are certainly entitled to follow the irrational crowd who ignore the basics of physics to satisfy their own religious dogma.
Since your knowledge is so much superior, why don't you just ignore the statements you regard as below your lofty intelligent standards and move on?
Don't you have other things to do?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.