Congressional rift over environment influences public

Jul 31, 2014

American citizens are increasingly divided over the issue of environmental protection and seem to be taking their cue primarily from Congress, finds new research led by a Michigan State University scholar.

The gap between conservatives who oppose and liberals who support it has risen drastically in the past 20 years, a trend seen among lawmakers, activists and – as the study indicates – the general public as well, said sociologist Aaron M. McCright.

The findings echo a June 12 Pew Research Center poll showing that, in general, Republicans and Democrats are more divided long ideological lines than at any point in the past two decades.

When it comes to the environment, McCright, reporting in the journal Social Science Research, said the "enormous degree" of polarization has serious implications.

"The situation does not bode well for our nation's ability to deal effectively with the wide range of environmental problems – from local toxics to – we currently face," said McCright, associate professor in MSU's Lyman Briggs College and Department of Sociology.

McCright and colleagues examined an annual national survey from 1974 to 2012 that included a question on environmental spending. According to the survey, which included more than 47,000 total respondents, the divide over environmental protection among citizens who consider themselves conservatives and liberals started growing particularly wide in 1992.

That coincides with the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union. Following that historic event, McCright said, the conservative movement replaced the "Red Scare" with the "Green Scare" and became increasingly hostile toward environmental protection.

McCright said the trend has been amplified by the Tea Party pulling the Republican Party even further to the right.

In 1990, the study found, about 75 percent of self-identified Democrats and Republicans alike in the general public believed the United States spent too little on environmental protection. By 2012, a gulf had formed between party followers, with 68 percent of Democrats believing the country spent too little on the environment, contrasted with only 40 percent of Republicans.

The trend roughly follows the environmental-protection voting patterns of Congress.

"This political polarization," McCright said, "is unlikely to reverse course without noticeable convergence in support of environmental protection among policymakers, with prominent conservatives becoming less anti-environmental in their public statements and voting records."

Explore further: Support for fracking drops for third time in a row with Conservatives most in favour

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The politics of climate change

Apr 29, 2013

U.S. residents who believe in the scientific consensus on global warming are more likely to support government action to curb emissions, regardless of whether they are Republican or Democrat, according to a study led by a ...

Are Christians becoming more 'green'?

Jul 24, 2013

Despite the wide-held perception that Christians have become more concerned about the environment, new research finds this so-called "greening of Christianity" is not evident among the religious rank-and-file.

Recommended for you

Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

Dec 18, 2014

Analysis of the results of a large-scale survey reveals the extent of truancy in English secondary schools and sheds light on the mental health of the country's teens.

Fewer lectures, more group work

Dec 18, 2014

Professor Cees van der Vleuten from Maastricht University is a Visiting Professor at Wits University who believes that learning should be student centred.

How to teach all students to think critically

Dec 18, 2014

All first year students at the University of Technology Sydney could soon be required to take a compulsory maths course in an attempt to give them some numerical thinking skills. ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Huffman
1 / 5 (8) Jul 31, 2014
Progressives are credulous, unskeptical and easily led off to unintended consequences.

The political divide is anti-progressive from progressive. Progressivism being the political bowel movement to make-things-better leaving US to suffer the unintended consequences - like the estimated twenty-two-thousand gun-control laws, always room for another.
PsycheOne
2.4 / 5 (7) Jul 31, 2014
Maybe people's opinion about the need to protect the environment hasn't changed. Maybe spending has gone too high and people are saying that enough is enough.
cjn
5 / 5 (3) Jul 31, 2014
FTA:
The gap between conservatives who oppose environmental protection and liberals who support it has risen drastically in the past 20 years, a trend seen among lawmakers, activists and – as the study indicates – the general public as well, said sociologist Aaron M. McCright.


1) Citizens of a district or state elect their congressional representatives. It would make sense that the people they elect share their views on a host of things, to include environmental protection. To suggest that, after election, that congressmembers go back to their constituents and coerce or reinforce their internal opinion on the electorate is just an asinine interpretation of the observations made. Generally, politicians are nothing if not pragmatic on most issues which don't influence their kickbacks, nepotistic proclivities, or absolute core "values."
cjn
2.3 / 5 (6) Jul 31, 2014
2) You can claim that all conservatives oppose "environmental protection", when the vast majority favor regulation of pollutants and toxic materials, are anti-littering, are for responsible mining and logging, and are for the protection of endangered species. But I guess that wouldn't match the author's preconceived notions of any one that doesn't think exactly like him.
TegiriNenashi
1 / 5 (6) Jul 31, 2014
"...said sociologist..." -- you might well stop reading just after that.
kochevnik
2.6 / 5 (5) Jul 31, 2014
Both parties are completely debased from their promoted ideologies. Democrat and Republican are nothing more than brands in a rigged market of ideas and influence peddling

Both parties consistently kowtow to the will of banksters and the British aristocracy. That is their true ideology - assisting British Neocolonialism and restricting property rights to a handful of elites. Everyone else will be a tenant. One simple example is real estate in USA: Only a land patent represents ownership. A title simple conveys whatever rights the government deems appropriate but is in reality is simply a receipt
ryggesogn2
1.8 / 5 (8) Jul 31, 2014
Congress doesn't lead.
Congress is getting its cues from the voters who melt their phone lines when they do something stupid.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.