Bigfoot hair samples mostly from bears, wolves

Jul 02, 2014 by Richard Ingham
In this undated photo made available by Britain's Channel 4 television of Oxford University genetics professor Bryan Sykes posing with a prepared DNA sample taken from hair from a Himalayan animal. DNA testing is taking a bite out of the Bigfoot legend. After scientists analyzed more than 30 hair samples reportedly left behind by Bigfoot and other related beasts like Yeti and almasty, they found all of them came from more mundane animals like bears, wolves, cows and raccoons. In 2012, researchers at Oxford University and the Lausanne Museum of Zoology issued an open call asking museums, scientists and Bigfoot aficionados to share any samples they thought were from the mythical ape-like creatures. (AP Photo/ Channel 4)

For those who believe in the yeti, the news can only be described as, well, abominable. Science has cast its methodical eye on samples of hair reputed to have been left by the Himalayan snowman of legend... and determined they came from a bear or a goat.

Similarly crushing disappointment lies in wait for those who believe in Big Foot, the yeti's North American counterpart; in the almasty, the elusive man of the Central Asian wastes; and in the orang pendek, a bipedal hominid reputed to roam the mountainous forests of Sumatra.

The evidence, reported in the British journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, comes from DNA testing of hair samples attributed to "anomalous primates," a neutral term for these creatures of legend.

The probe added the firepower of biotechnology to a debate that has been raging for decades.

"On the one hand, numerous reports including eye-witness and footprint evidence, point to the existence of large unidentified primates in many regions of the world," its authors said.

"On the other, no bodies or recent fossils of such creatures have ever been authenticated," they said. "Modern science has largely avoided this field."

Missing humans?

Theories for "sightings" of yeti and co. have ranged from surviving Neanderthals and other minor branches of the human family tree, to a species of giant ape, Gigantopithecus.

The investigators, led by University of Oxford genetics professor Bryan Sykes, sent out a request in May 2012 to museums and individual collectors—including renowned mountaineer Reinhold Messner—with samples of hair that reputedly came from "anomalous primates."

They received 30 hair samples in good enough shape to allow gene sequencing.

Three were said to be from yetis.

One of these was found to have come from a Southeast Asian goat called a serow (Capricornis sumatraensis).

The other two—one from Ladakh in India and the other from Bhutan—threw up an intriguing link in the DNA bank with... Ursus maritimus, or the polar bear.

The hairs likely came from a distant descendant of the polar bear or a local cross with a brown bear, the scientists suggested.

"If these bears are widely distributed in the Himalayas, they may well contribute to the biological foundation of the yeti legend, especially if, as reported by the hunter who shot the Ladakh specimen, they behave more aggressively towards humans than known indigenous bear species."

Eight samples attributed to the almasty came variously from the brown bear (Ursus arctos), or from cows, horses and racoons.

A single sample thought to have come from an orang pendek was traced to a Malaysian tapir (Tapirus indicus).

The 18 "Big Foot" samples were found to have a wide range of real world sources, ranging from the American black bear, raccoon and cow to a porcupine and either a wolf, coyote or dog.

Perhaps the biggest disappointment was a "Big Foot" tuft in Texas which turned out to have come from a hairy human—a European, judging by the genetic match.

The authors throw down the gauntlet to the "cryptozoology community"—those who believe in the existence of fabulous, hidden creatures—to throw up more convincing evidence to back their assertions.

"The techniques described here put an end to decades of ambiguity about species identification of anomalous primate samples and set a rigorous standard against which to judge any future claims."

Explore further: Insect mating behavior has lessons for drones

More information: Genetic analysis of hair samples attributed to yeti, bigfoot and other anomalous primates, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.0161

Related Stories

Project to examine 'Yeti' DNA

May 23, 2012

(Phys.org) -- A new collaboration between Oxford University and the Lausanne Museum of Zoology will use the latest genetic techniques to investigate organic remains that some have claimed belong to the ‘Yeti’ ...

Bigfoot genome sequenced? There are skeptics

Feb 19, 2013

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers led by Melba Ketchum of DNA Diagnostics in Nacogdoches, New Mexico, claims to have succeeded in sequencing the genome of Bigfoot (Sasquatch). The team published their findings ...

Siberian region 'confirms Yeti exists'

Oct 10, 2011

A Russian region in Siberia on Monday confidently proclaimed that its mountains are home to yetis after finding "indisputable proof" of the existence of the hairy beasts in an expedition.

Siberia plans 'institute to study yetis'

Mar 23, 2011

Officials in a Siberian region on Wednesday announced plans to open a scientific institute for researchers to study yetis, despite opposition from academics.

Recommended for you

Insect mating behavior has lessons for drones

23 hours ago

Male moths locate females by navigating along the latter's pheromone (odor) plume, often flying hundreds of meters to do so. Two strategies are involved to accomplish this: males must find the outer envelope ...

Godwits are flexible... when they get the chance

May 29, 2015

Black-tailed godwits are able to cope with unpredictable weather. This was revealed by a thorough analysis of the extraordinary spring of 2013 by ecologist Nathan Senner of the University of Groningen and ...

Do you have the time? Flies sure do

May 28, 2015

Flies might be smarter than you think. According to research reported in the Cell Press journal Current Biology on May 28, fruit flies know what time of day it is. What's more, the insects can learn to con ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Drogo
not rated yet Jul 03, 2014
Did they use Ockham's razor?
Surly
1 / 5 (1) Jul 04, 2014
Phylogenetics is all about parsimony, so I'm going to go with yes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.